James Lovelock: environmentalism has become a religion

cancel2 2022

Canceled
Once considered almost a god by the environmental movement, James Lovelock has seen the light and spoken out. I am more than a little surprised that the Guardian published this though.

b4ed55b2-ecd2-4aa7-b690-4361014f656e-460x276.jpeg


Environmentalism has "become a religion" and does not pay enough attention to facts, according to James Lovelock.

The 94 year-old scientist, famous for his Gaia hypothesis that Earth is a self-regulating, single organism, also said that he had been too certain about the rate of global warming in his past book, that "it’s just as silly to be a [climate] denier as it is to be a believer” and that fracking and nuclear power should power the UK, not renewable sources such as windfarms.

Speaking to the Guardian for an interview ahead of a landmark UN climate science report on Monday on the impacts of climate change, Lovelock said of the warnings of climate catastrophe in his 2006 book, Revenge of Gaia: "I was a little too certain in that book. You just can’t tell what’s going to happen."

“It [the impact from climate change] could be terrible within a few years, though that’s very unlikely, or it could be hundreds of years before the climate becomes unbearable," he said.

Lovelock's comments appear to be at odds with dire forecasts from a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on Monday, which leaked versions show will warn that even small temperature rises will bring "abrupt and irreversible changes" to natural systems, including Arctic sea ice and coral reefs.

Asked if his remarks would give ammunition to climate change sceptics, he said: "It’s just as silly to be a denier as it is to be a believer. You can’t be certain."
Talking about the environmental movement, Lovelock says: "It’s become a religion, and religions don’t worry too much about facts." The retired scientist, who worked at the Medical Research Council, describes himself as an "old-fashioned green."

Lovelock reiterated his support for fracking for shale gas, which has been strongly backed by David Cameron and the government but vigorously opposed by anti-fracking activists and local people at sites from Salford to Balcombe in West Sussex.

“The government is too frightened to use nuclear, renewables won’t work –because we don’t have enough sun – and we can’t go on burning coal because it produces so much CO2, so that leaves fracking. It produces only a fraction of the amount of CO2 that coal does, and will make Britain secure in energy for quite a few years. We don’t have much choice," he said.

Craig Bennett, director of policy and campaigns at Friends of the Earth, said: "I think every year it becomes harder to generalise about environmentalism. These days it ranges from people like green activists of the 1970s who Lovelock perhaps has in mind through to chief executives who say this is one of the most pressing concerns we have to address."
"The environmental community is no longer a minority but a majority of people who are concerned about the planet. That makes it much harder than ever to pigeonhole who the environmental community is."

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/mar/30/james-lovelock-environmentalism-religion
 
James Lovelock can suck my Johnson. He flat flucking doesn't know what he's talking about and is either divorced from reality or simply ignorant of it. My guess that since he's an academic it's probably the later.
 
James Lovelock can suck my Johnson. He flat flucking doesn't know what he's talking about and is either divorced from reality or simply ignorant of it. My guess that since he's an academic it's probably the later.

Nice to see a considered analysis of his views, wouldn't want it to descend into a diatribe or even a rant! He was right about CFCs long before anybody else, he is right now as well. The climate alarmists are no different to Scientologists, they even use the same methods.

Statements from 2012 portray Lovelock as continuing his concern over global warming while at the same time criticizing extremism and suggesting alternatives to oil, coal and the green solutions he does not support.[SUP][32][/SUP]

In an April 2012 interview, aired on MSNBC, Lovelock stated that he had been "alarmist", using the words “All right, I made a mistake,” about the timing of climate change and noted the documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the book The Weather Makers as examples of the same kind of alarmism. Lovelock still believes the climate to be warming although the rate of change is not as he once thought, he admitted that he had been “extrapolating too far." He believes that climate change is still happening, but it will be felt farther in the future.[SUP][32][/SUP] Of the claims “the science is settled” on global warming he states:[SUP][33]

.
[/SUP]
"One thing that being a scientist has taught me is that you can never be certain about anything. You never know the truth. You can only approach it and hope to get a bit nearer to it each time. You iterate towards the truth. You don’t know it."[SUP][33][/SUP]
.
He criticizes environmentalists for treating global warming like a religion.[SUP][33]

.
[/SUP]
“It just so happens that the green religion is now taking over from the Christian religion,” Lovelock observed
“I don’t think people have noticed that, but it’s got all the sort of terms that religions use … The greens use guilt. That just shows how religious greens are. You can’t win people round by saying they are guilty for putting (carbon dioxide) in the air.”[SUP][33][/SUP]
.
In the MSNBC article Lovelock is quoted as proclaiming:[SUP][32]

.
[/SUP]
"The problem is we don't know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn’t happened;" he continues
.
"The climate is doing its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now," he said
The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time ... it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising - carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that", he added.[SUP][32][/SUP]
.
In a follow up interview Lovelock stated his support for natural gas; he now favors fracking as a low-polluting alternative to coal.[SUP][13][/SUP][SUP][33][/SUP] He opposes the concept of "sustainable development", where modern economies might be powered by wind turbines, calling it meaningless drivel.[SUP][33][/SUP][SUP][34][/SUP] He keeps a poster of a wind turbine to remind himself how much he detests them.[SUP][13][/SUP]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lovelock
 
Last edited:
James Lovelock can suck my Johnson. He flat flucking doesn't know what he's talking about and is either divorced from reality or simply ignorant of it. My guess that since he's an academic it's probably the later.
He's finally pulled his head out of his ass. You should follow his example.
 
James Lovelock can suck my Johnson. He flat flucking doesn't know what he's talking about and is either divorced from reality or simply ignorant of it. My guess that since he's an academic it's probably the later.

LMAO; there you have it from the brain dead leftist point of view: "don't confuse me with reality or the facts. I believe, I believe!!!!"

You morons are a hoot.
 
Back
Top