One Percenter Convicted Of Raping Infant Child Dodges Jail

Y

Yoda

New member
One Percenter Convicted Of Raping Infant Child Dodges Jail Because He 'Will Not Fare Well

Wouldnt fare well ? this piece of shit raped his own 3 yr old daughter and BOUGHT his way out of jail and if you believe people didnt get paid lots of cash for this decision youre a dumbass.



A Delaware man convicted of raping his three-year-old daughter only faced probation after a state Superior Court judge ruled he "will not fare well" in prison.

In her decision, Judge Jan Jurden suggested Robert H. Richards IV would benefit more from treatment. Richards, who was charged with fourth-degree rape in 2009, is an unemployed heir living off his trust fund. The light sentence has only became public as the result of a subsequent lawsuit filed by his ex-wife, which charges that he penetrated his daughter with his fingers while masturbating, and subsequently assaulted his son as well.

Richards is the great grandson of du Pont family patriarch Irenee du Pont, a chemical baron.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/30/robert-richards-rape_n_5060386.html
 
Is this another Epstein private-island-of-sex slaves frequented by Bill Clinton thread?

Who's next? Soros?

Oh, those wacky one percenters. :rolleyes:
 
Yoda said:
One Percenter Convicted Of Raping Infant Child Dodges Jail Because He 'Will Not Fare Well

Wouldnt fare well ? this piece of shit raped his own 3 yr old daughter and BOUGHT his way out of jail and if you believe people didnt get paid lots of cash for this decision youre a dumbass.



A Delaware man convicted of raping his three-year-old daughter only faced probation after a state Superior Court judge ruled he "will not fare well" in prison.

In her decision, Judge Jan Jurden suggested Robert H. Richards IV would benefit more from treatment. Richards, who was charged with fourth-degree rape in 2009, is an unemployed heir living off his trust fund. The light sentence has only became public as the result of a subsequent lawsuit filed by his ex-wife, which charges that he penetrated his daughter with his fingers while masturbating, and subsequently assaulted his son as well.

Richards is the great grandson of du Pont family patriarch Irenee du Pont, a chemical baron.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/30/robert-richards-rape_n_5060386.html
Click to expand...

I just finished reading this story. Who fares well in prison? I guess black guys. We can put them in prison for years for smoking weed. But this sick bastard can't go to prison. This is really amazing. This judge should be in prison in the cell next to the pedophile rapist.
 
Darla said:
I just finished reading this story. Who fares well in prison? I guess black guys. We can put them in prison for years for smoking weed. But this sick bastard can't go to prison. This is really amazing. This judge should be in prison in the cell next to the pedophile rapist.
Click to expand...

No one but the rich could get a pass for RAPING HIS 3 YR OLD DAUGHTER. Darla could you please explain to Taft that his weaksauce attempt to deflect this to clinton wont work, just because he doesnt have any answer that makes sense
 
unfortunately it seems to be less and less uncommon for the judicial system to excuse this behavior as a sickness to be treated rather than punished....no he would not be treated well in prison, he would be the prey, hunted and victimized....kinda sounds like an appropriate justice....maybe this is part of something larger happening in society as we seem inclined to embrace and normalize sexual deviance....
 
Money Talks, out system is so corrupt that these people and people with "affuenza" don't have to go to jail.

The poor guy from the other side of town smokes a joint within 1000 feet of a church... well, make him face a minimum mandatory jail sentence of 20 years.
 
Darla said:
I just finished reading this story. Who fares well in prison? I guess black guys. We can put them in prison for years for smoking weed. But this sick bastard can't go to prison. This is really amazing. This judge should be in prison in the cell next to the pedophile rapist.
Click to expand...

Agreed... they should both be strapped naked to their beds face down, cell door open with a sign saying 'backdoor open, enter at will'
 
Taft2016 said:
Is this another Epstein private-island-of-sex slaves frequented by Bill Clinton thread?

Who's next? Soros?

Oh, those wacky one percenters. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

In the US, the rich can do what they choose. That's plutocracy for you, as the slave-owning founding fathers intended.
 
iolo said:
In the US, the rich can do what they choose. That's plutocracy for you, as the slave-owning founding fathers intended.
Click to expand...

if you are stating that the rule of law should be applied equally to all, then i and i think everyone would agree....will you apply this principle to obama and his administration.....
 
grumpyone said:
if you are stating that the rule of law should be applied equally to all, then i and i think everyone would agree....will you apply this principle to obama and his administration.....
Click to expand...

Why should I not? But I don't think you know much about equality over there, alas!
 
Yoda said:
One Percenter Convicted Of Raping Infant Child Dodges Jail Because He 'Will Not Fare Well

Wouldnt fare well ? this piece of shit raped his own 3 yr old daughter and BOUGHT his way out of jail and if you believe people didnt get paid lots of cash for this decision youre a dumbass.



A Delaware man convicted of raping his three-year-old daughter only faced probation after a state Superior Court judge ruled he "will not fare well" in prison.

In her decision, Judge Jan Jurden suggested Robert H. Richards IV would benefit more from treatment. Richards, who was charged with fourth-degree rape in 2009, is an unemployed heir living off his trust fund. The light sentence has only became public as the result of a subsequent lawsuit filed by his ex-wife, which charges that he penetrated his daughter with his fingers while masturbating, and subsequently assaulted his son as well.

Richards is the great grandson of du Pont family patriarch Irenee du Pont, a chemical baron.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/30/robert-richards-rape_n_5060386.html
Click to expand...


Another case of affluenza.

The rich feel they don't have to obey the laws that the average American does...this proves it.
 
grumpyone said:
please son, clarify this nonsense, does this mean anything at all.....
Click to expand...

Yes - you spend all your time licking the arses of the rich, who buy your parties and your law, as is obvious from all we read and hear. Is it against your religion to tell the truth? That seems to be par for the course, doesn't it?
 
I was on a just on a jury that convicted a fake 1 percenter of aggrevated incest of a minor.
He'll get jail
Who's suppose to fair well in prison.
The judge prob has a new home in the Virgin Islands.
 
iolo said:
Yes - you spend all your time licking the arses of the rich, who buy your parties and your law, as is obvious from all we read and hear. Is it against your religion to tell the truth? That seems to be par for the course, doesn't it?
Click to expand...

son, your head us so far up your own ass your own ass is the ass you lick at least that is obvious from what we all read and hear....moron....no insult to morons intended....
 
http://www.delawareonline.com/story...t-heir-finish-treatment-records-show/7475045/

A du Pont heir who raped his daughter was supposed to complete an intensive treatment program at an inpatient psychiatric clinic in Massachusetts as a condition of a sentence that allowed him to avoid prison time.

But he never did, court records show.

Superior Court Judge Jan R. Jurden ordered probation for Robert H. Richards IV in February 2009, on the condition that he be accepted for treatment at the expensive McLean Hospital near Boston, according to a transcript of the sentencing. Jurden agreed to probation only after the prosecutor argued the state typically would demand prison time in such child abuse cases, but was willing to accept probation because of the therapy Richards would receive at the out-of-state clinic.

"If the court is not inclined to send him to the Massachusetts program, then the state would be asking for some period of jail that the court would feel would be appropriate under the circumstances," prosecutor Renee Hrivnak said during the Feb. 6, 2009 hearing.

Moments after sentencing Richards to probation on the condition that he complete treatment in Massachusetts, Jurden expressed reservations about her decision to spare him prison time, referred to as Level V sentencing.

"I have concerns about this, because arguably you should be in Level V for what you did, and I hope you understand the gravity of what you did,'' Jurden told Richards.

Richards never went to McLean Hospital, Eugene J. Maurer Jr., his attorney at the time, said Tuesday. Richards instead remained in Delaware because of issues transferring his probation there and the fact that McLean did not have required security for an inmate such as Richards, Maurer said. Richards got care in Delaware under the supervision of probation officers.

Jurden has come under fire for sentencing Richards to probation and not prison, and for her notation that he "will not fare well" behind bars, one of the factors listed as a mitigating factor in her sentencing order. During the hearing, Jurden said she was willing to order probation for Richards because he planned to seek treatment at the Boston psychiatric program and had family support, two other mitigating factors also noted in her sentencing order.
 
Well, I guess in a society where you can kill your babies, it's not such a big deal if you rape them. I mean, it's just sex, right?
 
A DuPont heir goes free in a heinous child rape case, and it makes headlines on JPP, yet hundreds of thousands of Black men get sentences that are far longer than their white counterparts in this country and it barely even receives notice. That's because unlike this case it's not a rarity and the privileged class of white people who post here could care less about that, many of whom will call me a reverse racist for even mentioning it. The sooner judges are held to some kind of strict scrutiny the better. All this case shows to me is more white privilege within the judicial system. And the basic assumptions that underlie and support white privilege also underlie the notion of a privileged plutocracy. The sheep have to stop bleating and start rebelling, right now the plutocracy has the whole show sewn up!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top