the pope or the pompous, who do you believe.....

grumpyone

Banned
his holiness and his pompous barack have somewhat differing accounts of their discussion, this according to the washington times....his pompous aka barack stated ; “We actually didn’t talk a whole lot about social schisms in my conversations with His Holiness,” Mr. Obama said at a press conference in Rome. “In fact, that really was not a topic of conversation.” his holiness that would be the pope for dems, libs, socialists, communists, fascists and those just stuck on stupid....anyway, his holiness take on the conversation is this; The Vatican, however, issued a statement after the meeting saying the president’s discussions with Francis and two other top Vatican officials focused “on questions of particular relevance for the [Catholic] Church in [the United States], such as the exercise of the rights to religious freedom, life and conscientious objection” — issues that have fueled divisions between Mr. Obama and the church. is the pope, his holiness confused or is barack, the pompous lying yet again....this really is diagnosable don't ya think....
 
The old white dude in a dress!

Once again we see how usually untouchable racial minorities instantly become the target of liberal ridicule once they embrace a traditional ideology and/or faith...

... and the vehicle used to ridicule these minorities is again the usually untouchable image of sexual perversion.
 
Well Obama has lied in the past. I don't know of any lies the Pope has told. There is that.

Obama isn't a Christian. There is that

I m going with the Pope's version of events
 
his holiness and his pompous barack have somewhat differing accounts of their discussion, this according to the washington times....his pompous aka barack stated ; “We actually didn’t talk a whole lot about social schisms in my conversations with His Holiness,” Mr. Obama said at a press conference in Rome. “In fact, that really was not a topic of conversation.” his holiness that would be the pope for dems, libs, socialists, communists, fascists and those just stuck on stupid....anyway, his holiness take on the conversation is this; The Vatican, however, issued a statement after the meeting saying the president’s discussions with Francis and two other top Vatican officials focused “on questions of particular relevance for the [Catholic] Church in [the United States], such as the exercise of the rights to religious freedom, life and conscientious objection” — issues that have fueled divisions between Mr. Obama and the church. is the pope, his holiness confused or is barack, the pompous lying yet again....this really is diagnosable don't ya think....

Stop the presses!

Permanently Prohibited Poster Pretends Perceptiveness re: Pope and Pomposity !


Thursday, March 27, 2014

THE POPE RECEIVES PRESIDENT OBAMA: RESPECT FOR HUMANITARIAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN AREAS OF CONFLICT

Vatican City, 27 March 2014 (VIS) – This morning Barack H. Obama, president of the United States of America, was received in audience by Pope Francis, after which he met with Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin and Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, secretary for Relations with States.

During the cordial meeting, views were exchanged on some current international themes and hope was expressed that, in areas of conflict, there would be respect for humanitarian and international law and a negotiated solution between the parties involved.

In the context of bilateral relations and cooperation between Church and State, the Parties discussed questions of particular relevance for the Church, such as the exercise of the rights to religious freedom, life and conscientious objection, as well as the issue of immigration reform. Finally, the Parties stated their common commitment to the eradication of human trafficking throughout the world.

Rightie rag plants gossip item that "...a subtle competition to set the agenda played out after the meeting, which went well beyond its scheduled half-hour", but is forced to admit "only God knows for sure." Brain-dead hacks lap it up nevertheless.




 
maybe not for you, but 51% of the nation might disagree if only they knew what an abacus was....
Everyone now knows BO lies. Most know he lies frequently and quite a lot know hes a pathological liar. BO was foolishly hoping to get a little positive pr visiting the wildly popular pope. Considering the pope has been very vocal and recently so about the very things BO would have us believe he would talk about them not at all is just stupid.
 
Everyone now knows BO lies. Most know he lies frequently and quite a lot know hes a pathological liar. BO was foolishly hoping to get a little positive pr visiting the wildly popular pope. Considering the pope has been very vocal and recently so about the very things BO would have us believe he would talk about them not at all is just stupid.

Below is from the White House. Post #7 is from the Vatican. Explain the lies to me by comparing both, and please don't reference the Washington Times augur whose interpretation of the visit seemed to come from observing bird flights.

"I would say that the largest bulk of the time was discussing two central concerns of his," said the President. "One is the issues of the poor, the marginalized, those without opportunity, and growing inequality. ... And then we spent a lot of time talking about the challenges of conflict and how elusive peace is around the world."
I think the theme that stitched our conversation together was a belief that in politics and in life, the quality of empathy, the ability to stand in somebody else’s shoes and to care for someone even if they don't look like you or talk like you or share your philosophy -- that that's critical. It’s the lack of empathy that makes it very easy for us to plunge into wars. It's the lack of empathy that allows us to ignore the homeless on the streets. And obviously central to my Christian faith is a belief in treating others as I’d have them treat me. And what’s I think created so much love and excitement for His Holiness has been that he seems to live this, and shows that joy continuously.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/03/27/day-4-president-travels-italy-meets-pope
 
Stop the presses!

Permanently Prohibited Poster Pretends Perceptiveness re: Pope and Pomposity !


Thursday, March 27, 2014

THE POPE RECEIVES PRESIDENT OBAMA: RESPECT FOR HUMANITARIAN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN AREAS OF CONFLICT

Vatican City, 27 March 2014 (VIS) – This morning Barack H. Obama, president of the United States of America, was received in audience by Pope Francis, after which he met with Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin and Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, secretary for Relations with States.

During the cordial meeting, views were exchanged on some current international themes and hope was expressed that, in areas of conflict, there would be respect for humanitarian and international law and a negotiated solution between the parties involved.

In the context of bilateral relations and cooperation between Church and State, the Parties discussed questions of particular relevance for the Church, such as the exercise of the rights to religious freedom, life and conscientious objection, as well as the issue of immigration reform. Finally, the Parties stated their common commitment to the eradication of human trafficking throughout the world.

Rightie rag plants gossip item that "...a subtle competition to set the agenda played out after the meeting, which went well beyond its scheduled half-hour", but is forced to admit "only God knows for sure." Brain-dead hacks lap it up nevertheless.





What's that you say?

Desperate partisan hack Righties are once again trying to gin up some controversy?
 
If one of them is lying it doesnt take an abacus to figure out who it is.

I have come away from meetings having a different perspective than others that have attended the same meeting, so it doesn't have to be that one of them is lying, it's different perspectives.
 
Below is from the White House. Post #7 is from the Vatican. Explain the lies to me by comparing both, and please don't reference the Washington Times augur whose interpretation of the visit seemed to come from observing bird flights.

"I would say that the largest bulk of the time was discussing two central concerns of his," said the President. "One is the issues of the poor, the marginalized, those without opportunity, and growing inequality. ... And then we spent a lot of time talking about the challenges of conflict and how elusive peace is around the world."
I think the theme that stitched our conversation together was a belief that in politics and in life, the quality of empathy, the ability to stand in somebody else’s shoes and to care for someone even if they don't look like you or talk like you or share your philosophy -- that that's critical. It’s the lack of empathy that makes it very easy for us to plunge into wars. It's the lack of empathy that allows us to ignore the homeless on the streets. And obviously central to my Christian faith is a belief in treating others as I’d have them treat me. And what’s I think created so much love and excitement for His Holiness has been that he seems to live this, and shows that joy continuously.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/03/27/day-4-president-travels-italy-meets-pope

Try looking at what BO said himself as opposed to what the west wingers had to construct. BO is the liar, his staff simply do not say whay they dont want you to know. Remember they were very unhappy with 'if you like your doctor...'.
 
Everyone now knows BO lies. Most know he lies frequently and quite a lot know hes a pathological liar. BO was foolishly hoping to get a little positive pr visiting the wildly popular pope. Considering the pope has been very vocal and recently so about the very things BO would have us believe he would talk about them not at all is just stupid.

Everyone knows you are a Whiney little bitch
 
Try looking at what BO said himself as opposed to what the west wingers had to construct. BO is the liar, his staff simply do not say whay they dont want you to know. Remember they were very unhappy with 'if you like your doctor...'.

Paraphrasing Obama: Mostly we discussed the poor, the challenges of conflict and the elusiveness of peace.

Paraphrasing the WH: The overriding theme was quality of empathy and the lack of which causes the plunge into war, ignoring the poor, and following the golden rule.

How are the two interpretations diametrically opposed? Again, where is the lie?
 
Paraphrasing Obama: Mostly we discussed the poor, the challenges of conflict and the elusiveness of peace.

Paraphrasing the WH: The overriding theme was quality of empathy and the lack of which causes the plunge into war, ignoring the poor, and following the golden rule.

How are the two interpretations diametrically opposed? Again, where is the lie?

no darling, the overriding theme of the white house is they lie and then they lie about their lies and lie again.......
 
Back
Top