Crimea.

USFREEDOM911 said:
Did you know that he left his first wife and apparently purchased his current one?
Click to expand...

So he's an irrational critic of black slavery yet an eager participant in white slavery?

And an anti-Semite to boot?

And an international criminal?

:awesome:
 
Last edited:
Abraxas said:
Didn't bother the US when they invaded Iraq illegally.
Click to expand...

We didn't invade Iraq illegally; unless of course you think that tyrants who violate international laws and invade neighboring member states do not have to comply with their agreements and there should never be any consequences for such breaches.

But let's not drag this thread into another moronic off topic debate about Iraq.
 
Jarod said:
Russia was very unhappy when the US invaded Iraq and set up a Government that would be to our liking.
Click to expand...

Who cared if Russia preferred to continue supporting a thug dictator that caused instability in the region?

A Government to our liking? What kind of dimwitted statement is that? You don't think a representative Democratically elected Government is better than a megalomaniacal dictatorship? Why? How is a Democracy not to the Iraqi and Afghani peoples liking? You think they prefer a murderous dictator who robs the nations treasury for thee own benefit?

I can't imagine a more dimwitted statement.
 
Taft2016 said:
He's just pissed off we stopped Saddam from handing out those $25,000 bounties to surviving family members of suicide bombers in Israel.
Click to expand...

The Comrade Commander hates AmeriKa which is probably why he left to live in a 3rd world nation more to his liking. ;)
 
maineman said:
and I knew full well the legal issues that confronted my bringing a weapon into Mexico. I had to get from point A to point B... the road between them was fraught with danger. I made a decision to take steps to protect my family... I know it was illegal and have never said or implied otherwise.... and I'd do it again if I ever had to drive through Tamaulipas.
Click to expand...

So you did break the laws of another nation and lied. All those times you spent denying it, was a lie.

This should put the claim that you never lie, which was again a lie, to rest.
 
Taft2016 said:
To the contrary, the cease fire agreement, particularly the unfettered access for weapons inspections and the no-fly zones, *WERE* international law, as President Bush reminded the United Nations.

Allowing them to be violated at will virtually negated any notion of international law.
Click to expand...

They were UN resolutions and as such it was not up to the US to act without the mandate of the United Nations.
 
Abraxas said:
The trouble is that every time the U.S. decides that international law doesn't apply, it sends a message to other countries like Russia that they can do likewise. It was an illegal war against Iraq and it violated the UN Charter. Only self-defence or if it is approved by as security council resolution can a nation legally use force. A resolution was never even brought forward because they knew France and Russia would veto it and probably China would have abstained.

General Wesley Clark, the former Supreme NATO Allied Commander and Joint Chiefs of Staff Director of Strategy and Policy, describes in his 2003 book, Winning Modern Wars, his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: "As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan."
Click to expand...

I could have sworn that this thread is about an illegal bold attempt by the former Soviet Union to annex he Crimea illegally; an act that hasnt occurred since WWII?

The war in Iraq wasn't illegal no matter how many times you moronically claim it was. If you read and comprehended UN resolutions and the Joint Resolution, and understood the t the UN can't enforce anything without US leadership and power, you wouldn't make such dimwitted claims.
 
jet57 said:
A BIG thing for Russia is the Black Sea Port as a naval ship point at Sevastopol. The Crimea is really no different than when Putin took Georgia: GW Bush of course did nothing. Yeah, I think this whole thing pretty much boils down to the port.
Click to expand...

So that makes Russia's illegal annexation okay in the minds of history dunces?
 
Putin sends in non insignia troops, with face masks , thugs over the border (so called Russian tourists), then claims Uk Russians have to be protected.


So much has been said, not going to re-hash it all.

Nuland trekking around Independence Square with cupcakes, during the demonstrations taints the revolution.
or this: by the same ( intercepted call)
think Yats is the guy that, who's got the economic experience, the governing experience... What he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok on the outside”
Click to expand...


nuland112way_sq-ffc0e59bde6f9c994304b4e2b9e38e640557d0b5.jpg
 
Taft2016 said:
To the contrary, the cease fire agreement, particularly the unfettered access for weapons inspections and the no-fly zones, *WERE* international law, as President Bush reminded the United Nations.

Allowing them to be violated at will virtually negated any notion of international law.
Click to expand...

I guess we need to keep in mind that Leftist AmeriKa haters will never let facts get in the way of their dimwitted dogma.
 
christiefan915 said:
You cons are just jiffy quick with getting and disseminating the RW talking points. I'm embarrassed for you, not a single original thought among you.

"...Republicans have broadened the assault whenever possible. Shamefully but effectively, many of them made Obama, not Vladimir Putin, the prime culprit in Putin’s invasion of Crimea, hanging the word “weak” around the president’s neck. Democrats thought the killing of Osama bin Laden would forever guard Obama from comparisons with Jimmy Carter. They did not reckon with the GOP’s determination to Carterize and McGovernize any Democrat who comes along."
Click to expand...

Not as fast as you leftists dunces erupt with yours.
 
jet57 said:
So, what did GW do when Putin invaded Georgia?
Click to expand...

What does George Bush have to do with the illegal annexation of Crimea? Let me help you with this...NOTHING.

But let me assure you, I am not criticizing Obama for his lack of action here; Russia is the one laughing at him. I am pointing out that when you are a naive inexperienced inept buffoon like Obama who goes around the world telling everyone you think AmeriKa is the problem and desperately avoid conflict and declare you're no longer going to be the worlds Democracy leader and defender, don't expect anyone, particularly the enemies of freedom and Democracy, to give a shit what you say and the dimwitted threats that hold no water with anyone.
 
they talk backing America and SCREAM to the world about how fucked we and our president is.

fuck you fair weather fans
 
I backed Bush when he went into Afganistan.


You people HATE the first black president MORE than you love your country and it fucking shows
 
Abraxas said:
They were UN resolutions and as such it was not up to the US to act without the mandate of the United Nations.
Click to expand...

Apparently you have never read those resolutions. Try reading them before making yourself look naive and stupid. They give member states the authorization to enforce them; there is no "mandate" requirement except in the minds of AmeriKa hating, Saddam loving dunces.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top