Thursday at 9 on MSNBC the truth will be told

[Cancel 2020.1]

Odd reference given that Inigo Montoya was still trying to win and in the end killed the seven fingered man... whom you feel like... hmmm...

I guess that is what you get for killing his father... prepare to die!

\

Stop saying that!

The 'rewatchability factor' of that movie is off the charts. I never get tired of it...

 

[maineman]

He had to be removed, just ask Bill Clinton or his wife or most top democrats from that time.

Bullshit. Saddam was doing three things in 2003 better than we could do them and it would have been well worth our while to let him continue to do those things and free our resources for defeating Islamic extremist terrorism.
1. He kept sunnis and shi'ites from slaughtering one another.
2. He kept Al Qaeda from using Iraq as a staging ground and a recruiting goldmine
3. He kept the Iranians and their aspirations of regional hegemony in check.

 

[Belieber]

Bullshit. Saddam was doing three things in 2003 better than we could do them and it would have been well worth our while to let him continue to do those things and free our resources for defeating Islamic extremist terrorism.
1. He kept sunnis and shi'ites from slaughtering one another.
2. He kept Al Qaeda from using Iraq as a staging ground and a recruiting goldmine
3. He kept the Iranians and their aspirations of regional hegemony in check.

Bulltrue. Both Clinton's said it and so did numerous democrats, especially high ranking ones. You can deny this all day long, but it won't make it not true.

Let me guess, you're a truthmatters type democrat.

 

[maineman]

Bulltrue. Both Clinton's said it and so did numerous democrats, especially high ranking ones. You can deny this all day long, but it won't make it not true.

Let me guess, you're a truthmatters type democrat.

the fact that democrats ran scared after 9/11 and let the GOP cow them into supporting a senseless war with Iraq by questioning their patriotism is something I will always be ashamed of. In the days prior to 9/11, talk of removing Saddam may have been a good sabre-rattlng stump speech line, but after 9/11, it was nowhere near important enough to waste a minute of our time, a dime of our treasure, or a drop of our blood, imho. Our real enemy was clear, and it was not some pan-arab ba'athist secular tinhorn dictator.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Stop saying that!

The 'rewatchability factor' of that movie is off the charts. I never get tired of it...

Had it on VHS, dvd, now blu ray... one of the best movies because of what you mention... you can watch it over and over again and it is still funny. Never gets old.

Just go along for the ride and have fun storming the castle.

 

[Belieber]

the fact that democrats ran scared after 9/11 and let the GOP cow them into supporting a senseless war with Iraq by questioning their patriotism is something I will always be ashamed of. In the days prior to 9/11, talk of removing Saddam may have been a good sabre-rattlng stump speech line, but after 9/11, it was nowhere near important enough to waste a minute of our time, a dime of our treasure, or a drop of our blood, imho. Our real enemy was clear, and it was not some pan-arab ba'athist secular tinhorn dictator.

You are pathetic. Blaming republicans for forcing the pussy democrats to support the Iraq war. Liberals rarely take personal responsibility. Glad you admit you were wrong when you said bullshit earlier.

 

[Truth Detector]

and Bush didn't need to go to Outer Mongollia to find someone who doubted the certainty of Saddam's stockpiles of WMD's.... he didn't even have to get up out of his chair behind the desk in the oval office.... all he had to do was open up the NIE and see the pages of caveats and qualifiers which clearly delineated the less than certain nature of the intelligence surrounding Saddam's stockpiles. There was doubt sitting right on top of his desk... to then say "THERE IS NO DOUBT" was a lie. Again... if he and his lackeys had all said "I have no doubt", then their opinions would have been wrong, but saying them wouldn't have been lying.

LMAO @ the Outer Mongolia meme; and you wonder why people call you a dishonest dunce? Yeah shit-for-brains; Britain, Spain and Italy are in Outer Mongolia you moron.

This is your brain on Liberal (stupid); don't do Liberal (stupid).

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

You are pathetic. Blaming republicans for forcing the pussy democrats to support the Iraq war. Liberals rarely take personal responsibility. Glad you admit you were wrong when you said bullshit earlier.

The truth is the truth. You'll find very few lefties who forgive the Democrats for that - they were cowards.

But, without doubt, the Bush admin framed that entire vote around patriotism, and showing a "united front" to Saddam (to supposedly force his hand on inspections, but it was all wink, wink, we know it will be war, really). Democrats who opposed it were basically branded as traitors and terrorist sympathizers.

 

[Truth Detector]

Sane people don't rush nations into an unnecessary war.

Bush should have never been President.

Another Liberal dunce stuck on stupid claiming that there was a "rush" to war. So in the uninformed make believe world of Liberals, ten years of deliberate obfuscation from Saddam and refusal to allow the inspectors into the country and the 443 day run-up to invasion after the Joint Authorization constitutes a rush to war. Seriously, you people are too stupid for prime time.

10-Year Iraq War Timeline

Oct. 2, 2002 Congress Authorizes Iraq War
March 19, 2003 Combat Begins

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/10-year-iraq-war-timeline/story?id=18758663#2

 

[Truth Detector]

no, cunt...they were never located......they were inventoried in 93 and Iraq was ordered to destroy them.....apparently they were so incompetent they had no records they did so and until the war was completed everyone believed they were hiding them somewhere....Saddam played games instead of coming forward with the facts and he ended up dead because of it.......sucks to be Saddam....

BINGO; but do not expect the truth or facts change the minds of hyper partisan dunces stuck permanently on stupid.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Another Liberal dunce stuck on stupid claiming that there was a "rush" to war. So in the uninformed make believe world of Liberals, ten years of deliberate obfuscation from Saddam and refusal to allow the inspectors into the country and the 443 day run-up to invasion after the Joint Authorization constitutes a rush to war. Seriously, you people are too stupid for prime time.

10-Year Iraq War Timeline

Oct. 2, 2002 Congress Authorizes Iraq War
March 19, 2003 Combat Begins

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/10-year-iraq-war-timeline/story?id=18758663#2

Iraq was an unnecessary war. We now know that it would have been unnecessary on ANY timeline.

How can you defend it, or claim it wasn't a "rush"? We didn't NEED TO GO.

I'll save you the time on a response: "you so stupid! you liberals is so stupid!"

 

[Truth Detector]

sucks to be the fools that flushed a trillion dollars down the shitter invading a country to disarm them when they didn't have any arms to begin with, pimp.

and it must really suck to be YOU- still sucking on Bush's rectum this many years after the fact....

But it makes perfect sense after the fact to flush the lives of those who gave the ultimate sacrifice down the toilet of political correctness and running away from Iraq and Afghanistan leaving to their own devices to once more become Islamic dictatorships right shit-for-brains?

 

[Truth Detector]

Bullshit. Saddam was doing three things in 2003 better than we could do them and it would have been well worth our while to let him continue to do those things and free our resources for defeating Islamic extremist terrorism.
1. He kept sunnis and shi'ites from slaughtering one another.
2. He kept Al Qaeda from using Iraq as a staging ground and a recruiting goldmine
3. He kept the Iranians and their aspirations of regional hegemony in check.

LMAO; you left off gassing his own people, murdering people at whim, starving his people while he lived in palaces and invading two neighboring nations murdering thousands in the process.

Dumbass.

 

[Truth Detector]

You are pathetic. Blaming republicans for forcing the pussy democrats to support the Iraq war. Liberals rarely take personal responsibility. Glad you admit you were wrong when you said bullshit earlier.

BINGO and bravo for hitting that proverbial nail on the head. Do not expect your comments to get through the empty heads of leftist hyper partisans dunceds stuck permanently on stupid like Mainetard.

 

[Truth Detector]

The truth is the truth. You'll find very few lefties who forgive the Democrats for that - they were cowards.

But, without doubt, the Bush admin framed that entire vote around patriotism, and showing a "united front" to Saddam (to supposedly force his hand on inspections, but it was all wink, wink, we know it will be war, really). Democrats who opposed it were basically branded as traitors and terrorist sympathizers.

 

[maineman]

You are pathetic. Blaming republicans for forcing the pussy democrats to support the Iraq war. Liberals rarely take personal responsibility. Glad you admit you were wrong when you said bullshit earlier.

fuck you. I never would have voted for the war... and I have never voted for a democrat who DID vote for the war who did not, at some point, apologize for the mistake he or she made in casting it.

 

[Truth Detector]

Iraq was an unnecessary war. We now know that it would have been unnecessary on ANY timeline.

Because you say so; but alas, no one elected you as “decider” dumbass.

How can you defend it, or claim it wasn't a "rush"? We didn't NEED TO GO.

Easily; because unlike you, I don’t live in a fantasyland of hindsight and second guessing. I am honest and believe in sticking to the facts and I believed just as strongly then, as I do now, that acting was better than simply continuing doing absolutely NOTHING.

It doesn’t matter what you think; you’re a hate filled dishonest hyper partisan dunce stuck permanently on stupid making stupid claims like “rush to war” because you’re a brain dead partisan dunce who parrots the idiot talking points you have been fed without doing ANY fact checking; as illustrated above.

I'll save you the time on a response: "you so stupid! you liberals is so stupid!"

Yes, you really are THAT stupid, THAT dishonest, THAT partisan and THAT uninformed.

How can one call the glaring ignorance that erupts from your keyboard anything else?

Carry on dumbass.

 

[Truth Detector]

fuck you.

NO; fuck you asshole.

I never would have voted for the war...

No one gives a shit what a loser nobody like you would have done; this isn’t about what YOU would have done dumbass.

and I have never voted for a democrat who DID vote for the war who did not, at some point, apologize for the mistake he or she made in casting it.

LMAO; there you have it from the lunatic leftist. One can VOTE to go to war as long as they apologize for voting for it after the fact. After all, John Kerry was FOR the war before he was AGAINST the war. ::wink wink::

You’re really too stupid for prime time you know that shit-for-brains?

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Because you say so; but alas, no one elected you as “decider” dumbass.



Easily; because unlike you, I don’t live in a fantasyland of hindsight and second guessing. I am honest and believe in sticking to the facts and I believed just as strongly then, as I do now, that acting was better than simply continuing doing absolutely NOTHING.

It doesn’t matter what you think; you’re a hate filled dishonest hyper partisan dunce stuck permanently on stupid making stupid claims like “rush to war” because you’re a brain dead partisan dunce who parrots the idiot talking points you have been fed without doing ANY fact checking; as illustrated above.



Yes, you really are THAT stupid, THAT dishonest, THAT partisan and THAT uninformed.

How can one call the glaring ignorance that erupts from your keyboard anything else?

Carry on dumbass.

I've never seen a talking point in my life.

I was against the Iraq War from the day that Bush even mentioned the word "Iraq." I was against it when the resolution was voted on, and against every Democrat who voted for it. I was against it before invasion, and after invasion. And I was called a traitor & terrorist sympathizer for my position.

But, it turns out that I was right, and you & yours were wrong. Do you know how I know I was right? Because you & yours have gone from arguing that Dems were on the "wrong side of history" to tripping over yourselves trying to give Dems "credit" and distancing Bush as much as you can from accountability.

I wish it felt better being right; this is one case where it doesn't.

 

[NOVA]

You are wrong. "I have no doubt" is a statement of opinion and "there is no doubt" is a statement of fact, and even though you would rewrite every English composition textbook ever written if you could just to change that fact, the two statements are different. One means one thing and one means another. And when the president of the united states speaks, he speaks for his administration... he is the voice of our government. He lied to us. He said that doubt did not exist, even though it was sitting there on his desk in the NIE folder. There WAS doubt.... the intelligence was old, single sourced, based upon subjective photo analysis.... it was NOT a slam dunk. Nonetheless, Team Bush sold it that way... and they scared us with lies about Saddam and Al Qaeda being in cahoots even before 9/11. They scared us with stories of mushroom clouds over American cities. They led with fear. They will all rot in hell, if MY prayers are answered. So will you. Landlubber. Wog. Coward. Liar.

====================================

Maineman' s lies,
Team Bush....they scared us with lies about Saddam and Al Qaeda being in cahoots even before 9/11.

During President Clinton’s eight years in office, there were at least two official pronouncements of an alarming alliance between Baghdad and al Qaeda. One came from William S. Cohen, Mr. Clinton’s defense secretary. He cited an al Qaeda-Baghdad link to justify the bombing of a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan.
The other pronouncement is contained in a Justice Department indictment on Nov. 4, 1998, charging bin Laden with murder in the bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa.

The indictment disclosed a close relationship between al Qaeda and Saddam’s regime, which included specialists on chemical weapons and all types of bombs, including truck bombs, a favorite weapon of terrorists.

The 1998 indictment said: “Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States. In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq.”
http://tinyurl.com/ke5tecu

And Hillary Clinton still going strong in 2002, explaining her YES vote to go to war with Iraq.
She said of Saddam:
"He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members.

Maineman's lie should be put to rest, but somehow, I doubt it.