I have to laugh at the irony of an idiot like you who rails about using Wikipedia as a credible source then uses a leftist partisan blog as a source. You can't get much dumber and gullible than that shit-for-brains; got irony? Got hypocrisy?
GOP success?
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
I have to laugh at the irony of an idiot like you who rails about using Wikipedia as a credible source then uses a leftist partisan blog as a source. You can't get much dumber and gullible than that shit-for-brains; got irony? Got hypocrisy?
LMAO; two years is a nano second to hyper partisan dunces on the left. You just can't make this level of gullible stupidity up. They passed the trillion dollar pork laden "stimulus plan" without a singe Republican vote. They passed the multi trillion dollar ACA act without a single Republican vote.
Yet here they are whining that poor Obama, the most inept, inexperienced economic dunce to ever inhabit the White House, could not get anything done because of those big bad Republicans.
You can't fabricate the level of stupidity and glaring ignorance of the left these days. It never occurs to these fools that the reason Republicans dominate the House was because that was why the voters (remember them?)put them there; to stop the insanity. Insanity that expanded the national debt, Americans must pay, by $5 trillion in four short years. The fastest ramp up of national debt in the history of this nation of which, the "stimulus" and ACA will be the largest contributors.
But alas, to hyper partisan hypocrite dunces on the left, it is only good and patriotic to obstruct a Republican President; NOT dear leader.
You leftist hypocrites really are the most stupid people on the planet.
jet57
New member
I've already pointed out that the Cairo incident was little of nothing: demonstrations like that happen everyday all over the worls and flags are burned in those intances as well, so you're saying anything that is worth a grain of salt.
And still; every time I read what you say I see thats tupid looking cartoon. If that's how you want others to view you and your opinions then keep us laughing.
No...what you pointed out was that it happened in 2011...and breaking into a US embassy and burning the US flag might not matter
to you, but it is never a little thing to patriots.
Have you looked closely at your stupid cartoon?
Mine has a message.
you continue to miss the point. Its PRIOR actions/inactions that empower action of others. Putin knew there was a line he could not cross then. No such line exists jow.
Billy the Great Khan
Uwaa OmO
Why does Putin have a line? And what is our "line"?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
for your education:
Blue Dog Coalition
http://bluedogdems.ngpvanhost.com/
The DixieCrats
http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/dixiecrats.html
Those who switched...some have died just recently. And as one poster pointed out, let's not forget Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich!
As for Lamb and Benghazi, here's what the right wing bullhorn conveniently leaves out:
The requests were denied, but they were largely focused on extending the tours of security guards at the American Embassy in Tripoli — not at the diplomatic compound in Benghazi, 400 miles away. And State Department officials testified this week during a hearing by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that extending the tour of additional guards — a 16-member military security team — through mid-September would not have changed the bloody outcome because they were based in Tripoli, not Benghazi.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/13/w...e-focused-on-tripoli.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
As for Congressional Records:
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2014_rpt/benghazi.pdf
Note that they're talking about the EMBASSY in Tripoli, NOT Benghazi CONSULATE....and the Repubs were bitching about budget increase for that!
I'll dumb it down for you, the man who was killed had himself stated that extra security wasn't needed prior to the attack. Look it up, because I'm damned tired of doing your homework for you.
Also, remember that the 3 sites you mentioned refer to the SOURCE with ALL the information, and NOT a pundit or hack with partial information and a lot of supposition and conjecture.
Once again, Nova demonstrates the sheer proud ignorance and stupidity that permeates the neocon/teabagger mindset.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
LMAO; another dunce who thinks there is a difference between Communist Dictators and Fascist dictators.
Toddle on down to your local junior high and ask the history teacher there why Hitler and Mussolini hated and persecuted and KILLED communists. My God man, your proud ignorance is staggering!
You really are a gullible fool of epic proportions. It never occurs to idiots like you that Obama is the one unwilling to compromise with his political opponents and even announced his intent to usurp the Constitution and implement his agenda by circumventing Congress. Then the idiots on the Democrat side cheered; it doesn't get more pathetic and stupid than that.
Again, another revisionist bullhorn by a parrot: History tells a different story, as all one has to do is google, "Obama willing to compromise".
But alas, I'm trying to have a coherent debate with a hyper partisan idiot stuck on stupid; silly me. In your Fascist bitter small mind, you think that the opposition should just bend over and kowtow to "the one" because he cares more than none else on the planet; but it was patriotic to insult and obstruct Bush because he was....wait for it ... It's coming ... A REPUBLICAN.
Moron.
More blathering from this fool who doesn't even know the history or WWII. Willful ignorance and denial are TD's watchwords....a dumb deer chewing his cud, unable to fully understand what he's watching, as his cartoon represents.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Wikipedia allows buffoons like you to "edit" without proper documentation to back up a statement. Think Progress can and does produce links to "the horses mouth", so to speak.
Laugh, clown, laugh.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Everything that doesn't correspond to your beliefs is "irrelevant"....such is the mindset of the willfully ignorant.
It's called comprehensive reading, you twit. But that very concept is lost on you. Carry on. http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?61382-GOP-success&p=1458541#post1458541
I'll put my knowledge of history against your dimwitted version any time dumbass.
And "think progress" allows buffoons like you to parrot repugnant and stupid leftist talking points. Yay you!
Dumbass.
Lets dumb it down even more for you.....short and to the point.
In a stream of diplomatic cables,embassy security officers warned their superiors at the State Department of a worsening threat from Islamic extremists, and requested that the teams of military personnel and State Department security guards who were already on duty be kept in service.
The requests WERE DENIED.....true, it was the EMBASSY in Tripoli, NOT Benghazi CONSULATE...and THAT IS THE POINT where incompetence comes to light...
Its the State Dept.'s responsibility to allocate security where its obviously needed, and because of their incompetence, they ignored the Consulate AND cut security at the Embassy...which also came under attack.
State gets a budget and its their responsibility allocate funds where THEY see fit....Republicans had nothing to say about where each dollar was spent....
and as I posted before, they spent a lot of their budget on bullshit art, dinnerware, and charging stations for elect. cars....
THE BOTTOM LINE REMAINS:
Under oath, Ms. Lamb testified that budget considerations played no part in considering additional security.
Incidently, putting the blame on the dead, don't help your cause.
Last edited:
And to clarify....
In their debate, Mr. Biden responded to Mr. Ryan’s attacks by accusing him and his fellow Republicans of cutting the administration’s request for embassy security and construction. House Republicans this year voted to cut back the administration’s request, but still approved more than was spent last year.
State can move assets to any place they see fit to spend more money....its their call, not the Congress and certainly not the Republicans.
In their debate, Mr. Biden responded to Mr. Ryan’s attacks by accusing him and his fellow Republicans of cutting the administration’s request for embassy security and construction. House Republicans this year voted to cut back the administration’s request, but still approved more than was spent last year.
State can move assets to any place they see fit to spend more money....its their call, not the Congress and certainly not the Republicans.
Hitler's justification the occupation of the Sudetenland:
"Our foreign policy is not determined by weltanschaaung (a way of life). Our aim is the preservation of the German people. We are not interested in the suppression of other people, nor to having other people among us. Let them be happy in their way and let us be happy in ours. This limits our foreign policy; but the aims of foreign policy are neither unlimited nor erratic. "They are not dependent on chance. We have decided to preserve the German people. We shall protect it and save it. "
Putins justification occupation of the Crimea:
"Russia retains the right to protect its interests and the Russian-speaking population,"
Sound similar?
Ukraine mobilizes army after Putin's 'declaration of war'
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...s-declaration-of-war/articleshow/31324256.cms
"Our foreign policy is not determined by weltanschaaung (a way of life). Our aim is the preservation of the German people. We are not interested in the suppression of other people, nor to having other people among us. Let them be happy in their way and let us be happy in ours. This limits our foreign policy; but the aims of foreign policy are neither unlimited nor erratic. "They are not dependent on chance. We have decided to preserve the German people. We shall protect it and save it. "
Putins justification occupation of the Crimea:
"Russia retains the right to protect its interests and the Russian-speaking population,"
Sound similar?
Ukraine mobilizes army after Putin's 'declaration of war'
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...s-declaration-of-war/articleshow/31324256.cms
jet57
New member
My cartoon was done by a very famous award winning car designer and artist. Your cartoon sasy nothing and just makes you look stupid. Like I say; if that;s what you want, great - it's working.
Now how about trying to prove that something horrendous came from that 4 year old incident that is all but forgotten: a flag got burned; big deal. The place was not overrun and nobody died. Under old cut and Ronald Regan however it was a quite different wasn't it. Under GW Bush 5800 Americans died for nothing didn't they. Sorry but your weak bullshit won't wash.
THEN A MORON COMES ALONG WITH THIS POST.....thats you.
The embassy was attacked in 2012, junior....
if you still think that was 4 years ago, you need some remedial math...
So you're still the same idiot as you were when you made the initial stupid claim.....
and nothing came of it...Obama is in charge...but later that same say, the Benghazi Consulate was attacked and Americans murdered...and nothing came of that either.
jet57
New member
Oh shit!! I missed it by one number. So, what came of it?
Anti-Party
Tea Is The New Kool-Aid
Hitler's justification the occupation of the Sudetenland:
"Our foreign policy is not determined by weltanschaaung (a way of life). Our aim is the preservation of the German people. We are not interested in the suppression of other people, nor to having other people among us. Let them be happy in their way and let us be happy in ours. This limits our foreign policy; but the aims of foreign policy are neither unlimited nor erratic. "They are not dependent on chance. We have decided to preserve the German people. We shall protect it and save it. "
Putins justification occupation of the Crimea:
"Russia retains the right to protect its interests and the Russian-speaking population,"
Sound similar?
Ukraine mobilizes army after Putin's 'declaration of war'
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...s-declaration-of-war/articleshow/31324256.cms
I never read this before, thank you.
No really, thank you. (hoping that idiot has EVERYTHING in common with a Nazi.)