Hands off, Argies! These'll soon be the richest islands on Earth

cancel2 2022

Canceled
  • Two oil companies are exploring the water off the Falklands
  • Around 350 million barrels could be below the northern sea bed
  • It is estimated that there could be ten times as much to the south
  • That much oil could make the Falkland islands billions, and leaves residents facing an unprecedented period of change
  • The islanders remain fervently British and willing to fight to stay so
article-2560864-120A566A000005DC-265_634x409.jpg



Attack: Pictured during the last invasion, Royal Marines go ashore at Port San Carlos to liberate the islands
 
Says the island nation with no navy.

From the article.

But as senior personnel at Mount Pleasant (the Falklands’ extensive military base) were at pains to tell me, for Mrs Kirchner even to attempt an invasion would require a miracle. Our defence cuts have prompted retired generals in Britain to question publicly whether we could hope to re-take the islands as Margaret Thatcher’s task force did. Their successors at the sharp end at Mount Pleasant say it would never come to that, because there is, in their view, no hope of an invasion succeeding. The Argentinian air force is based on the same aircraft that lost the last war. They do not have the range to attack the islands, because Argentina no longer has an aircraft carrier or airborne refuelling capability. The four state-of-the-art Typhoons at Mount Pleasant would make mincemeat of them.

Thanks to cuts, Argentina’s navy has no amphibious capability, so it could not put soldiers ashore in the way it did in 1982. Such ships as it has are obsolete: a picture of a troopship sinking last year while in harbour in Argentina because it had simply rotted away greatly amused Falklanders. If its fleet started to move south from ports in Argentina, Britain could reinforce the islands via Ascension Island in the Atlantic (fighter planes or troop planes refuelling there could get to the Falkland Islands within a day), and — crucially — using the main runway at Mount Pleasant (which did not exist in 1982) before any ships could arrive at the islands. ‘The best Argentina could hope for is a landing by special forces,’ a senior officer told me. ‘But even then, they have got to get here undetected — and whether by sea or air, our radar would pick them up the moment they set out.’

This week I saw for myself the reassuring array of firepower the Army could bring to bear to repel and attack. The Mount Pleasant complex is the main military base and the civil airport, covering several thousand acres 35 miles south-west of Stanley. It is home to around 1,000 military personnel from all services, mainly the Army, and 1,000 support staff. The main strike weapons against an aggressor are the fearsome Typhoon fighter bombers. There is also a Rapier missile battery and other permanently staffed anti-aircraft emplacements around the islands. HMS Clyde — which boasts a helicopter deck, troop accommodation, a 30mm gun and surveillance radar — patrols the waters along with two smaller vessels.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...fight-old-enemy-gets-ideas.html#ixzz2tZxo2Gf7
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
4 Typhoons will not stop a determined attack, regardless of the age of the Argentinian force. And once occupied, you would be unable to dislodge them. The loaner carrier France would be giving you certainly wouldn't be allowed to go down there.


I suggest that you read the article in more detail.

The Argentinian air force is based on the same aircraft that lost the last war. They do not have the range to attack the islands, because Argentina no longer has an aircraft carrier or airborne refuelling capability. The four state-of-the-art Typhoons at Mount Pleasant would make mincemeat of them.

Thanks to cuts, Argentina’s navy has no amphibious capability, so it could not put soldiers ashore in the way it did in 1982. Such ships as it has are obsolete: a picture of a troopship sinking last year while in harbour in Argentina because it had simply rotted away greatly amused Falklanders. If its fleet started to move south from ports in Argentina, Britain could reinforce the islands via Ascension Island in the Atlantic (fighter planes or troop planes refuelling there could get to the Falkland Islands within a day), and — crucially — using the main runway at Mount Pleasant (which did not exist in 1982) before any ships could arrive at the islands. ‘The best Argentina could hope for is a landing by special forces,’ a senior officer told me. ‘But even then, they have got to get here undetected — and whether by sea or air, our radar would pick them up the moment they set out.’
 
Last edited:

I didn't say it was or it wasn't but it seems to be your definitive reference. Just trying to show you that there were no indigenous people on the Falklands before the Europeans came. Unlike the US where vast numbers of people live on former indigenous peoples' land. You might like to know that I have edited quite a few Wiki articles in the past. I did a couple only last week.
 
Last edited:
I didn't say it was or it wasn't but it seems to be your definite reference. Just trying to show you that there were no indigenous people on the Falklands before the Europeans came. Unlike the US where vast numbers of people live on former indigenous peoples' land.

Right Tom, there were no indigenous peoples in Europe, right? Furthermore, wasn't it Europeans who killed vast numbers of indigenous people in the New World?
 
dude are you aware of the demographics in cali?

The Indigenous peoples of California are the indigenous inhabitants who have lived or currently live in the geographic area within the current boundaries of California before and after the arrival of Europeans. With over one hundred federally recognized tribes,[SUP][1][/SUP] California has the largest Native American population and largest number of distinct tribes of any US state. Californian tribes are characterized by linguistic and cultural diversity.

The Population of Native California was reduced by 90% during the 19th century—from over 200,000 in the early 19th century to approximate 15,000 at the end of the century.[SUP][7][/SUP] Epidemics swept through California Indian Country, such as the 1833 malaria epidemic.[SUP][12][/SUP]
In 1834 the Spanish missions shifted to Mexican control and were secularized, but lands under their control were not reverted to tribes. Many landless Indians found wage labor on ranches. The United States took control of California in 1848 with the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, that did not honor aboriginal land title.[SUP][12][/SUP]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_California
 
  • Two oil companies are exploring the water off the Falklands
  • Around 350 million barrels could be below the northern sea bed
  • It is estimated that there could be ten times as much to the south
  • That much oil could make the Falkland islands billions, and leaves residents facing an unprecedented period of change
  • The islanders remain fervently British and willing to fight to stay so
article-2560864-120A566A000005DC-265_634x409.jpg



Attack: Pictured during the last invasion, Royal Marines go ashore at Port San Carlos to liberate the islands
That would make it an imperative for the US to implement the Monroe Doctrine. The US won't tolerate that sort of British presence in the western hemisphere. Sorry old chap.
 
Back
Top