Subject of "All Up In My Snatch" thinks The Hildebeast is swell

I believe that the primary process for my party will result in a candidate that shares my political philosophy and has the qualifications necessary for the position. I am far from apathetic about politics. I put my money where my mouth is and give generously to campaigns and PACS that share my philosophy.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and yet he had no qualifications such as being an effective senator the first time, nor any qualifications like personnel management for the second? and you still maintain that HRC has qualifications?
Click to expand...

You're a Constitutional scholar. What quals does the Constitution require for a President?
 
NOVA said:
For Petraeus its payback time.....he didn't get to be the director of the CIA for his good looks....

Alas...seems like only yesterday just about every Democrat in the country was calling him General Betrayus.....
Click to expand...

I never called him that... and he got to be DCI by being a wicked smart man.... why wouldn't you value the opinion of a wicked smart career military man like him?
 
maineman said:
I believe that the primary process for my party will result in a candidate that shares my political philosophy and has the qualifications necessary for the position. I am far from apathetic about politics. I put my money where my mouth is and give generously to campaigns and PACS that share my philosophy.
Click to expand...

in other words, you'll follow the lead of millions of other apathetic voters and mark a check for a letter. got it.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you've read how many of my posts here and STILL believe that I would vote for the GOP nominee?????? are you qualified to vote?
Click to expand...

are you saying that Hillary is more simpatico with you than the GOP field of candidates? really?

Oh... I know... you'll cast a symbolic vote of protest for some loser third party guy without a snowball's chance in hell of winning. It was 5000 greenies in New Hampshire that felt that way and voted for Nader that gave us bumbling Dubya.... but you go right ahead... take your vote and run away from the playground. Your call.
 
NOVA said:
Incompetence ?.....the dead bodies in Benghazi proves the first, and the truth proves the other.
Click to expand...

in my claims of incompetence, I was referring to mainemans approval of Obama and his qualifications of incompetence like not being aware of ATF gunrunning to mexico and IRS targeting of TEA party groups.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you are obfuscating the issue, naturally. if the only thing that matters to you is the basic requirements according to the constitution, then why bother extolling upon the merits of any candidate?
Click to expand...
to rally the faithful, of course. Everyone's got a favorite candidate... everyone wants their candidate to win. Everyone thinks their candidate is better than all the other candidates... come on... this can't come as a surprise to you!
 
maineman said:
are you saying that Hillary is more simpatico with you than the GOP field of candidates? really?
Click to expand...
we are not talking about who is more 'simpatico' with me, we are talking about what you consider qualifications for president.

maineman said:
Oh... I know... you'll cast a symbolic vote of protest for some loser third party guy without a snowball's chance in hell of winning. It was 5000 greenies in New Hampshire that felt that way and voted for Nader that gave us bumbling Dubya.... but you go right ahead... take your vote and run away from the playground. Your call.
Click to expand...

I'd rather be a real man and American who stands on principle than be a wishy washy and apathetic idiot more afraid of what the other side can do if they win, so you'll vote for the lesser of two evils.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you are obfuscating the issue, naturally. if the only thing that matters to you is the basic requirements according to the constitution, then why bother extolling upon the merits of any candidate?
Click to expand...

Because I see too much of cons picking and choosing requirements when it comes to presidential candidates. Example, cons are still calling Obama a "community organizer" who had no qualifications for office, yet the same cons are touting Rand Paul the eye doctor who has no qualifications either, if we go by that standard.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
in my claims of incompetence, I was referring to mainemans approval of Obama and his qualifications of incompetence like not being aware of ATF gunrunning to mexico and IRS targeting of TEA party groups.
Click to expand...

every president makes mistakes.... no president can ever know what the hell is going on throughout the gigantic executive branch of government. I just want them to try to keep their eye on the BIG things.... like "OBL determined to attacked within the US" instead of the golf ball on the tee.
 
maineman said:
to rally the faithful, of course. Everyone's got a favorite candidate... everyone wants their candidate to win. Everyone thinks their candidate is better than all the other candidates... come on... this can't come as a surprise to you!
Click to expand...

surprise? no. I'd be happier watching all of you extoll your apathy by a party preference than to someone who actually has the best interests of our country at heart.
 
christiefan915 said:
Because I see too much of cons picking and choosing requirements when it comes to presidential candidates. Example, cons are still calling Obama a "community organizer" who had no qualifications for office, yet the same cons are touting Rand Paul the eye doctor who has no qualifications either, if we go by that standard.
Click to expand...

see that? we can at least agree on something, as trivial as it is.
 
maineman said:
every president makes mistakes.... no president can ever know what the hell is going on throughout the gigantic executive branch of government. I just want them to try to keep their eye on the BIG things.... like "OBL determined to attacked within the US" instead of the golf ball on the tee.
Click to expand...

so as an apathetic american, you'll overlook violations of the laws that an executive is tasked with enforcing as long as you feel safe? wouldn't that make you a Bush supporter then? wouldn't accountability by the executive firing and charging his underlings who violate those laws be a good qualification?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top