Delta Airlines needs to remedy this.

[Canceled.2014.1]

It means it was "addressed", as stated.

What resolution would satisfy WB, the mighty internet avenger of injustice?

Should Delta be compelled by corporate shame to divulge the results of their internal review and any policy changes they have implemented?

"an internal review is under way to determine what occurred so that appropriate action can be taken."




http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/15/delta-apologizes-for-treatment-of-wounded-marine/#ixzz2rWhVV8Oq

[/QUOTE]

In a previous post you said the issue had been resolved. An apology from a corporate PR dept is not resolving anything. And the more pressure Delta feels, the more likely they are to make sure this never happens again.

This is how the free market works. I have the ability to press for changes by both how I spend money and by contacting the companies I deal with.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

So until I pointed it out, you failed to notice that this occurred and was addressed last year, as I suspected?

The year is only 26 days old. Many relevant news stories originated last year.

 

[Big Money]

I have the ability to press for changes by both how I spend money and by contacting the companies I deal with.

LOL, are you a frequent Delta flier?

A stockholder?

Perhaps you can explain how you are entitled to the results of an internal review.

Or perhaps not...

 

[Truth Detector]

The fact that Delta employs many people with good paying jobs does not excuse bad treatment of a disabled veteran. And I am not trying to tear down anything. I simply believe that a young man who lost his legs in the service of his country deserves better treatment. And given the statement of a retired Army Lt Col, I think the treatment was pitiful. When our veterans are treated badly, I think it is our duty to speak up and demand better. But apparently some people here like to wave a flag around and claim to support veterans, but when it comes down to actually doing it, they hide behind weak excuses.

So I am just making excuses?

 

[Big Money]

The year is only 26 days old. Many relevant news stories originated last year.

So you didn't know about the apology and internal review when you started this thread...sweet.

 

[Truth Detector]

To hold this incident up to the light of day to make sure that it does not happen again. According to BigM, an apology given by the PR dept means the incident has been resolved. I want to make sure that this sort of crap does not happen again.

Do you really think that this cannot happen again if you post this year old story on a political blog? Fascinating.

 

[Big Money]

Because he's just another troll.

Only people who have no defense for their obnoxious and meaningless actions and statements resort to calling others trolls.

.

insults and vulgarity are the last refuge of the weak-minded.

 

[Truth Detector]

So an apology from the PR dept means the issue is "resolved"? lol

I thought it means that they acknowledged they made a mistake and are working to ensure it would not happen again; what do you think it meant?

 

[Big Money]

Do you really think that this cannot happen again if you post this year old story on a political blog? Fascinating.

His powers are immense, aren't they?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

LOL, are you a frequent Delta flier?

A stockholder?

Perhaps you can explain how you are entitled to the results of an internal review.

Or perhaps not...

Did I say I was entitled to the results of the internal investigation?

 

[Truth Detector]

To make sure delta knows that people are outraged. This will be one more bit of encouragement to make sure this incident is not repeated.

Do you think Delta will read your thread?

 

[Big Money]

Did I say I was entitled to the results of the internal investigation?

Could that be because you aren't, and this is your way of admitting it?

 

[Big Money]

Do you think Delta will read your thread?

Yeah, all 40 or so of the regular posters at JPP are major influencers...

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Do you really think that this cannot happen again if you post this year old story on a political blog? Fascinating.

The story is not a year old. It is less than 2 months old.

You fell victim to BM playing flast and loose with the "last year" nonsense.

I think that I can provide motivation for change. Do you think the story should just be forgotten?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

So you didn't know about the apology and internal review when you started this thread...sweet.

Is that what I said?

 

[Big Money]

This is how the free market works. I have the ability to press for changes by both how I spend money and by contacting the companies I deal with.

How many Delta flights do you take per month, on average?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

I thought it means that they acknowledged they made a mistake and are working to ensure it would not happen again; what do you think it meant?

I am not judging whether or not it was an actual call for changes or a quick coverup. I am trying to make sure that Delta knows that people will not stand for such behavior.

I am curious, why do you not want me to keep this in the light and push for better treatment of disabled veterans? From the testimony and the apology, the attendants did not treat the young man well at all. Why is that ok?

 

[Big Money]

You fell victim to BM playing flast and loose with the "last year" nonsense.

It happened in 2012, which was last year.

You didn't know that when you puffed up your chest with poutrage, did you?

You seem flustered, as evidenced by your spelling error. Are you angry at the way this thread turned out?

Are you going to break Rule 12 again?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Do you think Delta will read your thread?

Someone will read the email I sent them.

 

[Truth Detector]

The story is not a year old. It is less than 2 months old.

You fell victim to BM playing flast and loose with the "last year" nonsense.

I think that I can provide motivation for change. Do you think the story should just be forgotten?

My mistake, I didn't look at the dates closely; but no, I am not saying the story should be forgotten, but that it should be up understood in context of the industry as a whole and the difficulties trying to accommodate dimwitted regulations trying to accommodate everyone in a society.

What I am trying to discern is the real agenda behind this facade of caring more than anyone else.