Mexico's government 'strongly rejects' upcoming execution in Texas of Mexican citizen

You are surprised that Yurt continues to defend Bush?

What we can never be surprised about is the amazing level of stupidity you bring to every thread you engage in.

Yes Rune, you really are THAT stupid and THAT repugnant. See a professional about this "yurt" issue you are having. It is already getting very old.

Here’s my suggestion; ask a moderator if I have ever posted as anyone else on this forum. I will be happy to allow them to answer that question honestly so you can stop spamming threads with your childish nonsense.

Now do grow up; or at least try?

Dunce.
 
Must still blame Bush... somehow...

Dear forum owner; could you please confirm for the brain damaged Rune that I have never had any other forum name so that he can stop his childish prattle and stupid thread spamming?

Thank you in advance.
 
If a statement is made about "wish we had a leader with balls", pointing out the fact that both Obama AND Bush did the same thing is a far cry from trying to still blame Bush.

That's a fascinating claim; but it doesn't make any more sense the second time you spouted it off.
 
So you admit then, that you are uninformed about this and instead, went on an ideological tirade about Bush; got it. ;)

So my comments were a rant? How so? Do you know what a rant is? How did my comments fit that definition?

Just in case there is any doubt:

rant [rant] verb (used without object)

1. to speak or declaim extravagantly or violently; talk in a wild or vehement way; rave: The demagogue ranted for hours.

verb (used with object)

2. to utter or declaim in a ranting manner.

noun

3. ranting, extravagant, or violent declamation.


4. a ranting utterance.


Again, Bush is no longer President so what he has done in the past is not relevant to what is happening now. I know simple concepts are difficult for the Bush angst you carry, but get over it. He hasn't been President for five years. Claiming that one needs to point to every leader in the past that has been spineless in order to call the current leader spineless; well, that's just incredibly stupid.

Why do stupid?

If you are going to object to my calling your post a "rant", calling my mentioning that Bush did the same thing is hardly a "tirade".

Look, you hate Obama and I get that. I'm not a fan of him either. But the bullshit you posted deserved to be challenged.
 
If you are going to object to my calling your post a "rant", calling my mentioning that Bush did the same thing is hardly a "tirade".

Then what would you call it; a desperate deflection, or an opportunistic obfuscation?

LMAO

Look, you hate Obama and I get that. I'm not a fan of him either. But the bullshit you posted deserved to be challenged.

I don’t “hate” Obama. Where do you get this “hate” shit from; because you say so?

How was it bullshit? Hell, you didn’t even know what the hell you were talking about when you responded.

Let’s be honest here; you are all butt hurt I called your guy out for the spineless buffoon that he is and then desperately tried to deflect it onto Bush whom you still appear to have so much built up angst about.

Bush was ten times, no, one hundred times the leader Obama can only desperately pretend to be.

I don’t “hate” Obama; I point him out for the inept, inexperienced, arrogant, partisan economic dunce that he is. Nothing more, nothing less; if it is not factual, please point it out and we can have that debate.
 
Sorry Yurt I doubt Damo can save you this time, since you both live in the same area (you and yurt).

You really are embarrassing yourself with this stupidity. But alas, you're an idiot, idiots can't help but remove any doubt they are dunces.

Carry on dimwitted one. ;)
 
Wow, do you understand that Simplefreak's analogy was invalid or not?

I understand that the common reason for hydrophobia is not cured as you claimed. Your claim was sufficiently invalid that whatever Superfreak had to say couldn't possibly have been worse.
 
I understand that the common reason for hydrophobia is not cured as you claimed. Your claim was sufficiently invalid that whatever Superfreak had to say couldn't possibly have been worse.
When humans are exposed to rabies they are treated, not put down like dogs.
 
When humans are exposed to rabies they are treated, not put down like dogs.

Dogs are almost invariably pretreated for rabies. When people exhibit symptoms of rabies they are not treated, other than end of life treatment because they will die, in pain and hallucinating.
 
I guess the argument is which is more humane...

1) Putting the guy in a cage for the rest of his life
2) Ending his life

We put rabid dogs down and say it is the humane thing to do. Yet some object to doing so with humans.

Dogs aren't reasoning beings and two wrongs don't make a right.
 
Back
Top