He stood his ground?!! (Not?!!)

French 75 said:
It's because he doesn't actually know, and he knows he doesn't know.
Click to expand...

Oh I know enough.

For instance; I know enough to NOT attempt to engage you in civil discourse when it comes to how to stop irresponsible gun owners from killing those they love.

I know not to do this because in the past whenever I tried to discuss the issue with you, no matter how sincere my inquiry or comment was, it was met with nothing but more derision and evasion...just like you're doing right now.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Oh I know enough.
Click to expand...

Wrong shit-for-brains; you don’t know much of anything and constantly prove it with every dumbass post.

ZappasGuitar said:
For instance; I know enough to NOT attempt to engage you in civil discourse when it comes to how to stop irresponsible gun owners from killing those they love.
Click to expand...

This is a perfect example of what a pathetic, repugnant dishonest dunce you are and how you spam this forum with your dimwitted strawmen in an effort to prove what a dunce you really are.

Stop irresponsible gun owners from killing those they love? Where do you come up with this bullshit?

ZappasGuitar said:
I know not to do this because in the past whenever I tried to discuss the issue with you, no matter how sincere my inquiry or comment was
Click to expand...

Really shit-for-brains? So the above bullshit about stopping irresponsible gun owners from killing those they love was your version of honest dialogue?

Not only are you a crap flooding thread troll, but an incredibly dishonest whiney effeminate dunce as well.

ZappasGuitar said:
it was met with nothing but more derision and evasion...just like you're doing right now.
Click to expand...

This is my favorite effeminate whine from dishonest partisan assholes like you; the notion that you never insult those who disagree with the dimwitted dishonest pabulum you spam here.

Yeah, you care so much you’re just trying to stop those mean irresponsible gun owners from killing those they love.
You crack me up; and are painfully stupid and dishonest.

Let's try some honesty from you; how did existing gun laws or more gun laws prevent Sandy Hook from happening?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Oh...

Oh my heavens...

Oh...if only I gave a shit what a pathetic partisan turd like Defective Truth thinks of my responses.

Oh how WILL I go on?!?
Click to expand...

But you do care dumbass; you respond each and every time. That's because you really are THAT stupid and THAT dishonest.

;)
 
Truth Detector said:
Wrong shit-for-brains; you don’t know much of anything and constantly prove it with every dumbass post.



This is a perfect example of what a pathetic, repugnant dishonest dunce you are and how you spam this forum with your dimwitted strawmen in an effort to prove what a dunce you really are.

Stop irresponsible gun owners from killing those they love? Where do you come up with this bullshit?



Really shit-for-brains? So the above bullshit about stopping irresponsible gun owners from killing those they love was your version of honest dialogue?

Not only are you a crap flooding thread troll, but an incredibly dishonest whiney effeminate dunce as well.



This is my favorite effeminate whine from dishonest partisan assholes like you; the notion that you never insult those who disagree with the dimwitted dishonest pabulum you spam here.

Yeah, you care so much you’re just trying to stop those mean irresponsible gun owners from killing those they love.
You crack me up; and are painfully stupid and dishonest.

Let's try some honesty from you; how did existing gun laws or more gun laws prevent Sandy Hook from happening?
Click to expand...


Astounding!

No, really!

You berate me over and over, you hurl one derisive attack after another, and yet you think I will actually answer the question in your final sentence?

GFY!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Astounding!

No, really!

You berate me over and over, you hurl one derisive attack after another, and yet you think I will actually answer the question in your final sentence?

GFY!
Click to expand...

LOL He has got to be the least self-aware poster we've ever had here, and that is not a easy field to compete in here! He is funny though...long streams of vulgar invective followed by whiny complaints that he's being treated so mean mommy by the bad liberals.
 
Truth Detector said:
But you do care dumbass; you respond each and every time. That's because you really are THAT stupid and THAT dishonest.

;)
Click to expand...


I respond because it's fun to poke you with a stick and watch the venom just erupt from you in all directions!

I respond to you so I can get my RDA of laughter!

You are without a doubt the FUNNIEST pathetic asswipe on these forums...the level of pomposity you bring to each and every post is just hysterical and your inability to respond with anything other than the same tired, juvenile put downs highlights just what a total buffoon you really are!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
You berate me over and over, you hurl one derisive attack after another, and yet you think I will actually answer the question in your final sentence?

GFY!
Click to expand...

I berate you because you are a repugnant dishonest hyper partisan asshole of epic proportions. AND, it's fun to watch you whine like an effeminate vagina man when your bullshit gets called out.

Carry on dunce.
 
Darla said:
LOL He has got to be the least self-aware poster we've ever had here, and that is not a easy field to compete in here! He is funny though...long streams of vulgar invective followed by whiny complaints that he's being treated so mean mommy by the bad liberals.
Click to expand...

I am amused that you think you have some kind of self-awareness given the incredibly stupid provocative spam you’re given to posting here.

Are you aware that other than the little harem of dunces that act as your lap dogs on the forum; few here like you? As a matter of fact, most enjoyed it when you were gone. We didn't have to suffer the prolific level of ignorant dishonest flame baiting spam you post here that you mistake for substance.

Now run along and clean that strap-on you just used on Zappastard; we can hear his effeminate whine all the way to the West Coast.

;)
 
cawacko said:
Zap, what specifics would you envision in written and firing tests?
Click to expand...


I would envision sitting down with experts in the field of mental health and designing a written exam that would identify those with anger management and impulse control issues.

Anyone with anger management or impulse control issues would not be allowed to own a weapon until such time as they complete the proper psychiatric treatment program.

A firing test might consist of having the weapon in front of the person being tested and requiring him/her to reassemble the gun before firing.

Those tested must demonstrate the proper proficiency to reassemble the weapon before being allowed to own one.

Happy?

Now...let the petty derisive attacks begin!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I would envision sitting down with experts in the field of mental health and designing a written exam that would identify those with anger management and impulse control issues.

Anyone with anger management or impulse control issues would not be allowed to own a weapon until such time as they complete the proper psychiatric treatment program.

A firing test might consist of having the weapon in front of the person being tested and requiring him/her to reassemble the gun before firing.

Those tested must demonstrate the proper proficiency to reassemble the weapon before being allowed to own one.

Happy?

Now...let the petty derisive attacks begin!
Click to expand...

I would envision sitting down with experts in the field of mental health and designing a written exam that would identify those with anger management and impulse control issues.

Anyone with anger management or impulse control issues would not be allowed to VOTE until such time as they complete the proper psychiatric treatment program.

Those tested must demonstrate the proper proficiency regarding our system of Government, laws and the Constitution before being allowed to VOTE.
 
This man needs to be put away for the rest of his life.

That said, the SYG laws are essentially sound. The fact that this retired cop shot someone does not change that.
 
Right said:
Here we have it, a clear statement that shows this woman despises the Constitution.
Click to expand...


Well I sure am sorry to hear that ma'am...maybe in time you'll come to respect the Constitution like I do.

Next time however, how about you NOT refer to yourself in the third person.

It makes you sound sort of pompous and it's a bit confusing.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Well I sure am sorry to hear that ma'am...maybe in time you'll come to respect the Constitution like I do.

Next time however, how about you NOT refer to yourself in the third person.

It makes you sound sort of pompous and it's a bit confusing.
Click to expand...

Per usual, when you are exposed with your indefensible position, you become obtuse.

So tell me again, woman, how our rights came from "wealthy land owners" and not God, and EXACTLY how that equates for RESPECT for the Constitution.
 
Right said:
Per usual, when you are exposed with your indefensible position, you become obtuse.

So tell me again, woman, how our rights came from "wealthy land owners" and not God, and EXACTLY how that equates for RESPECT for the Constitution.
Click to expand...


I'm sorry, who is this "woman" you keep talking to?


Let me know when you're done talking to her and we can go back to discussing your ridiculous double standard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top