More bald faced hypocrisy from another Conservative

Truth Detector said:
How amusing that the dullard Liberal class on JPP thinks these lunches are "free."

Dunces.
Click to expand...

Even more amusing in a sad way is that the excruciatingly stupid conservative class on JPP wants to punish needy kids.

Where's Dickens when you need him?

"Please sir, may I have more?"

200px-Dickens_oliver_twist.gif
 
christiefan915 said:
Even more amusing in a sad way is that the excruciatingly stupid conservative class on JPP wants to punish needy kids.
Click to expand...

Do elaborate on how Conservatives on this forum can punish children; should be good for a chuckle.

But the ones making these children suffer are the irresponsible parents who had the children too young, had them out of wedlock and had them when they could not afford to have children.

Fascinating that a dunce like you blames everyone BUT the parent who created the child; why is that?

And why is it everyone else’s responsibility but not that of the parents?

And why do Liberals call it “free?”

christiefan915 said:
Where's Dickens when you need him?
Click to expand...

Where’s common sense when debating the dullard class?
 
Truth Detector said:
Do elaborate on how Conservatives on this forum can punish children; should be good for a chuckle.

But the ones making these children suffer are the irresponsible parents who had the children too young, had them out of wedlock and had them when they could not afford to have children.

Fascinating that a dunce like you blames everyone BUT the parent who created the child; why is that?

And why is it everyone else’s responsibility but not that of the parents?

And why do Liberals call it “free?”

Where’s common sense when debating the dullard class?
Click to expand...

Who said the parents shouldn't be blamed for their failures? Certainly not me. See post #3.

Carry on, loser.
 
The children are starving..squawk....the children are starving...squawk......the conservatives don't care....squawk.....The children are starving....squawk.....
 
Remember when that idiot Democrat Congresswoman actually thought Rush Limbaugh wanted his grandmother to eat cat food?
 
Rana said:
No, I missed that one, don't listen to Rush, what was the Congress person's name?
Click to expand...

Yeah, because Rush Limbaugh saying if they didn't earn enough money in their lives let them eat catfood, is like Damo saying USFreedom will have to apologize and then not making him ever do it. That is, when Rush Limbaugh says "let them eat cat food" he is just being metaphorical and cat food is really a metaphor for filet mignon! All true!
 
Dantès said:
Yeah, because Rush Limbaugh saying if they didn't earn enough money in their lives let them eat catfood, is like Damo saying USFreedom will have to apologize and then not making him ever do it. That is, when Rush Limbaugh says "let them eat cat food" he is just being metaphorical and cat food is really a metaphor for filet mignon! All true!
Click to expand...

It's funny how Rush plays you idiots. We can tell when he's playing you all, but there's always some idiot congress person or talking head who doesn't get it and reveals their ignorance.
 
Ishmael Pequod said:
It's funny how Rush plays you idiots. We can tell when he's playing you all, but there's always some idiot congress person or talking head who doesn't get it and reveals their ignorance.
Click to expand...

We know Rush is an entertainer and I don't find him entertaining so I don't listen to him.

There is a segment if the population that follows him and thinks his entertainment is news and forget it is opinion.
 
Dantès said:
Yeah, because Rush Limbaugh saying if they didn't earn enough money in their lives let them eat catfood, is like Damo saying USFreedom will have to apologize and then not making him ever do it. That is, when Rush Limbaugh says "let them eat cat food" he is just being metaphorical and cat food is really a metaphor for filet mignon! All true!
Click to expand...

LOL. Seriously, you're so far gone into your world that you have no idea what the man actually said. Context is everything, people on the left who get their news from leftwing sources are the only ones who believe this, and it is because they are fed what they want to hear. It's just blathering nonsense based on what you want to believe about others and has no basis in reality.
 
One conservative policy is for communities to vote (at their local school level) whether they should adopt a "free lunch" policy at their school or not. If the community doesn't vote to adopt it, other options can be addressed to those concerned (see next paragraph). If they vote to adopt this policy, those against it can either move to another community, or opt out of the extra taxes needed to help pay for it. The community would then set the guidelines for the process, etc. By default, everyone in that community would be paying the local taxes that would pay for that school's "free" lunches. This is a policy that would only work if it stays localized...If there's a state or federal override, then it ruins the intention to keep a community responsible for each other and its own success or status.

Additionally, a conservative solution for hungry children is to invite them to be home-schooled by a willing parent in the community who is already home-schooling, and, out of the goodness of their heart, also provide them lunch, while encouraging the parent of the hungry child to find or get a job if they don't already have one. That way, the home-schooling, charitable parent is seen as the "giver", rather than a politician or government entity being viewed [falsely] as the "giver"...
 
Rana said:
No, I missed that one, don't listen to Rush, what was the Congress person's name?
Click to expand...

I'm still searching for the originator of that also.

-----------Merged------------

Rana said:
We know Rush is an entertainer and I don't find him entertaining so I don't listen to him.

There is a segment if the population that follows him and thinks his entertainment is news and forget it is opinion.
Click to expand...

Like one of my neighbors! He lives and dies by con talk shows!
 
blacknwhite321 said:
One conservative policy is for communities to vote (at their local school level) whether they should adopt a "free lunch" policy at their school or not. If the community doesn't vote to adopt it, other options can be addressed to those concerned (see next paragraph). If they vote to adopt this policy, those against it can either move to another community, or opt out of the extra taxes needed to help pay for it. The community would then set the guidelines for the process, etc. By default, everyone in that community would be paying the local taxes that would pay for that school's "free" lunches. This is a policy that would only work if it stays localized...If there's a state or federal override, then it ruins the intention to keep a community responsible for each other and its own success or status.

Additionally, a conservative solution for hungry children is to invite them to be home-schooled by a willing parent in the community who is already home-schooling, and, out of the goodness of their heart, also provide them lunch, while encouraging the parent of the hungry child to find or get a job if they don't already have one. That way, the home-schooling, charitable parent is seen as the "giver", rather than a politician or government entity being viewed [falsely] as the "giver"...
Click to expand...

Do you think the parent already home-schooling is willing to provide free education to a stranger's kid and a free lunch also?

I don't know what the regulations are concerning home-schooling or whether a person can in effect open up his own school at home and teach other kids besides his children. If you're doing home daycare, for instance, you still have certain rules to abide by.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top