A Deadly Mix in Benghazi

that doesn't answer my question in any way. please try again. No one is saying that Benghazi wasn't dangerous. No one is saying that the state department didn't know that, in a perfect world, they should provide more security there... AND DOZENS OF OTHER LESS THAN OPTIMALLY PROTECTED FOREIGN MISSIONS.... I am asking you how we were to know that Benghazi needed to be at the top of that priority list? Can you answer THAT question or not? If not... please just say so... your tap dancing is getting more and more pathetic with each stanza.

You need to read your own dimwitted post and attempt to comprehend how incredibly stupid you sound. But alas, you're a dishonest idiot; how could you possibly comprehend this.

Gee, I don't know dunce; if everyone else has pulled their mission and I am told there is no way the safety of my staff can be assured by the Libyans themselves, I think I would have done what everyone else did and PuLLED the mission out.

But I also would not have tried to LIE to the Anerican people claiming it was a spontaneous protest because of an anti-Muslim video no one had seen. But again, I can't get into the minds of dishonest partisan hacks.

But you're too stupid to comprehend the OBVIOUS and I am trying to debate a dishonest idiot desperately trying to wallow in a never ending circle of stupidity.

Dismissed Commander; arguing with dishonest idiots like you is a waste of bandwidth.
 
Well gosh, if Cokie Roberts says it is so, it must be so!!

Dunce.

Well golly if Reince Priebus says it is so, it must be so. The Whitewater reference was a weird touch, given that repub attack dog Ken Starr couldn't pin anything on Hillary about it. Maybe the "talking points" guy needs his own talking points.

Insufferable oaf.

"Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus thinks a Hillary Clinton presidential run might not be so bad for Republicans, given that, in his words, “scandal surrounds her.”

“With all of the scandal around her I’m not sure it would be all that bad for the Republican Party, to tell you the truth,” Priebus told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Tuesday when he was asked about the former Secretary of State. “She wanders and scandal surrounds her. We talk about Benghazi. We talk about the health care rollout in the early ’90s. Whitewater. I mean, you name it.”

 
I never said he went there for his health, and his deputy never used the word "orders" to describe his visit. LIAR.

and no...it's NOT HIS fault...and it is NOT Hillary's fault. It is the fault of the terrorists who killed him. moron.

Dear dunce, you inferred it with your dimwitted attempts to blame everyone BUT your messiah.
 
You need to read your own dimwitted post and attempt to comprehend how incredibly stupid you sound. But alas, you're a dishonest idiot; how could you possibly comprehend this.

Gee, I don't know dunce; if everyone else has pulled their mission and I am told there is no way the safety of my staff can be assured by the Libyans themselves, I think I would have done what everyone else did and PuLLED the mission out.

But I also would not have tried to LIE to the Anerican people claiming it was a spontaneous protest because of an anti-Muslim video no one had seen. But again, I can't get into the minds of dishonest partisan hacks.

But you're too stupid to comprehend the OBVIOUS and I am trying to debate a dishonest idiot desperately trying to wallow in a never ending circle of stupidity.

Dismissed Commander; arguing with dishonest idiots like you is a waste of bandwidth.

why can't you answer a simple question?

And, in a different vein, do you honestly think that America should follow the rest of the world in the conduct of foreign policy? Really?
 
Yep. Your posts and your sig. You're a Hillary pawn.

Moron. My sig is in reference to all the conservative dunderheads who bashed Hillary for staying with her husband after the Lewinsky affair.

You know who I mean, the so-called family values dunderheads who abhor divorce except when they can use it as a club to bash some liberal.
 
Well golly if Reince Priebus says it is so, it must be so. The Whitewater reference was a weird touch, given that repub attack dog Ken Starr couldn't pin anything on Hillary about it. Maybe the "talking points" guy needs his own talking points.

Insufferable oaf.

"Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus thinks a Hillary Clinton presidential run might not be so bad for Republicans, given that, in his words, “scandal surrounds her.”

“With all of the scandal around her I’m not sure it would be all that bad for the Republican Party, to tell you the truth,” Priebus told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Tuesday when he was asked about the former Secretary of State. “She wanders and scandal surrounds her. We talk about Benghazi. We talk about the health care rollout in the early ’90s. Whitewater. I mean, you name it.”


What do all your deflections here have to do with Benghazi and your dunce like attempts to absolve Ovama and Hillary? Let me help you; NOT A THING.
 
Moron. My sig is in reference to all the conservative dunderheads who bashed Hillary for staying with her husband after the Lewinsky affair.

You know who I mean, the so-called family values dunderheads who abhor divorce except when they can use it as a club to bash some liberal.

Yep. You're a Hillary pawn. Admit it. You support her bid for president. Right?
 
I implied nothing... your inferences are your own business. If you put words in my mouth, I will always spit them out at you. douchebag.

I didn't put any words in your mouth dunce; I illustrated the stupidity of your claims.

In your dunce version of events Stevens was in Benghazi for no reason and was culpable for his own death. It had NOTHING to do whatsoever with his bosses or the fact that his bosses tried to lie about the events after the fact. Or the fact that during the attack no efforts were made to rescue Stevens.

It's all Stevens and Republicans fault according to you morons.
 
Back
Top