More bald faced hypocrisy from another Conservative

Find me a Democrat who has denounced free school lunches for the poor while simultaneously paying for his staff's meals with taxpayer dollars and I will denounce them.

So let me try to understand your dunce argument; if you're a congressperson who is fine with stealing other peoples money to feed other people's children, then it fine if you expense your travel and meeting expenses per the law; BUT, if you are against stealing other peoples money to feed other people's children, then it is NOT okay to legally expense your meeting expenses?

Does that sum it up correctly?
 
Doesn't matter...free lunches are a part of the "legitimate benefits package" those kids enjoy.

Another greedy Rightie wants to take away the "legitimate benefit" those kids enjoy while keeping his own perks intact of course.

Free lunches are now a right?

God you're one dumb dunce aren't you?
 
No it's not. You don't seem to understand the difference between earned benefits and handouts. That's a major fail for you.
It would be so much better if we could just revert to child labor and seven year olds could pay their own way. Ain't republicanism grand?
 
You know, I just laugh at Liberals who think they alone are anointed to govern the masses. They think they are clean, innocent, pure as the wind driven snow, but their policies always eventually end up in failure.
 
It would be so much better if we could just revert to child labor and seven year olds could pay their own way. Ain't republicanism grand?

Do you honestly think that proposal amounts to "child labor"? I think it fosters personal responsibility and respect for labor.
 
So let me try to understand your dunce argument; if you're a congressperson who is fine with stealing other peoples money to feed other people's children, then it fine if you expense your travel and meeting expenses per the law; BUT, if you are against stealing other peoples money to feed other people's children, then it is NOT okay to legally expense your meeting expenses?

Does that sum it up correctly?


No, as usual, you are incorrect.

Let me help you...

If you are a congressperson who is fine with using TAXPAYER money to feed other people's children AS PER THE LAW, then it is fine if he/she uses TAXPAYER money to pay for travel and meeting expenses PER THE LAW.

- - - Updated - - -

Free lunches are now a right?

God you're one dumb dunce aren't you?


Free lunches are the LAW.

But no one really expects a partisan pinhead such as you to understand that.
 
"Benefits Package".....oh my god. What in the hell are you talking about a "benefits "package"?. They're students
. Didn't your mommy ever tell you that there is no such thing as a free lunch? Dumb Ass.


Call it what you like, free lunches are a "benefit" afforded to children who meet a specific criteria in school today.

You, just like all the others are trying desperately to derail this discussion by playing your word games.
 
Precisely what I've come to expect from those with no counterpoint.

Keep doing an OUTSTANDING job of highlighting for everyone how incapable of discussing the topic you really are.

:good4u:
Honestly, woman, I find your inability to understand the English language beyond 6th grade comprehension very amusing. :rofl2:
 
Do you honestly think that proposal amounts to "child labor"? I think it fosters personal responsibility and respect for labor.

If it's about fostering personal responsibility etc. then all the kids should rotate doing cafeteria work, not just the needy ones.

-----------Merged------------

Call it what you like, free lunches are a "benefit" afforded to children who meet a specific criteria in school today.

You, just like all the others are trying desperately to derail this discussion by playing your word games.

The mind just boggles at their mean-spiritedness.
 
What a surprise...of course what's good for the poor isn't good for hypocritical Righties!


‘No free lunch’ Republican bills taxpayers for his food but tells poor kids to work for theirs


A Georgia Republican who suggested school children do cafeteria work because there’s “no such thing as free lunch” billed thousands of dollars for his own meals to taxpayers.

WSAV-TV found that Rep. Jack Kingston, who’s running for the U.S. Senate, had filed expense reports for as much as $4,182 worth of lunches for his office staff over the past three years.

That could have purchased nearly 2,000 school lunches, reported Talking Points Memo.

Kingston, who opposes the federal school lunch program, drew widespread criticism last month when he suggested children clean school cafeterias or sweep up in exchange for their meals.

“But one of the things I’ve talked to the secretary of agriculture about (is), why don’t you have the kids pay a dime, pay a nickel to instill in them that there is, in fact, no such thing as a free lunch?” Kingston said. “Or maybe sweep the floor of the cafeteria — and yes, I understand that that would be an administrative problem, and I understand that it would probably lose you money, but think what we would gain as a society in getting people — getting the myth out of their head that there is such a thing as a free lunch.”

That’s a lesson that Kingston apparently hasn’t learned himself.

In addition to his own taxpayer-funded meals, the station reported, the congressman also received $4,289 in free meals billed to third-party groups such as the Georgia Bankers Association and the Congressional Institute.

WSAV reported that Kingston traveled abroad on congressional business at a taxpayer cost of $24,313, which includes more than just meals, and filed expense reports for $145,391 in meals for campaign events.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/...od-while-asking-poor-kids-to-work-for-theirs/

You see some pieces of shit once you live long enough, but the mind really boggles at a piece of shit like this. The great mystery of life, for me, will always remain; how do these human filthbags sleep nights?
 
Conservative Christians donate to inner city missions and food banks considerably. Plus govt food stamps. The only starving kids in America live in darlas sick little noggin.
 
It would be so much better for us to say that it isn't a right and let the children go hungry, right?

Wrong again dunce; it would be so much better if we taught personal responsibility and didn't force other people to feed others children.

You can get your tiny eensy weensy brain around that right?
 
No, as usual, you are incorrect.

Let me help you...

If you are a congressperson who is fine with using TAXPAYER money to feed other people's children AS PER THE LAW, then it is fine if he/she uses TAXPAYER money to pay for travel and meeting expenses PER THE LAW.

- - - Updated - - -




Free lunches are the LAW.

But no one really expects a partisan pinhead such as you to understand that.

No, I think I got it right when I said your dimwitted argument basically was: if you're a congressperson who is fine with stealing other people’s money to feed other people's children, then its fine if you expense your travel and meeting expenses per the law; BUT, if you are against stealing other people’s money to feed other people's children, then it is NOT okay to legally expense your meeting expenses.

Carry on.
 
Back
Top