Charges for 106 in Huge Fraud Over Disability

christiefan915

Catalyst
New mayor DeBlasio's carriage scandal pales in comparison to this. Anytime you wonder how low people can sink, remember the quote from Monty Python: "Honorable sir, it is true that I am a low mean snake. But you, sir, could walk beneath me wearing a top hat.''

"The retired New York City police officers and firefighters showed up for their psychiatric exams disheveled and disoriented, most following a nearly identical script. They had been coached on how to fail memory tests, feign panic attacks and, if they had worked during the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, to talk about their fear of airplanes and entering skyscrapers, prosecutors said. And they were told to make it clear they could not leave the house, much less find a job.

But their Facebook pages told investigators a starkly different story, according to an indictment and other court papers. Former police officers who had told government doctors they were too mentally scarred to leave home had posted photographs of themselves fishing, riding motorcycles, driving water scooters, flying helicopters and playing basketball. “The brazenness is shocking,” Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the Manhattan district attorney, said on Tuesday.

The online photos, along with intercepted phone calls and the testimony of undercover officers, were evidence of what officials said was the largest fraud ever perpetrated against the Social Security disability system, a scheme stretching back to 1988 in which as many as 1,000 people — many of them officers and firefighters already collecting pensions from the city — were suspected to have bilked the federal government out of an estimated $400 million."

(Continued)

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/08/n...s-charged-in-social-security-scheme.html?_r=0
 
What is surprising is that you seem surprised. Anytime you put out free money from others regardless the good intentions this is what you get.

The most nefarious thing is that you invariably hire people to administer said programs whose job security now rests in more and more people being dependent on the programs, so they become part of the problem.

There are two axioms in life that will serve people well and they are true no matter what business or endeavor you are talking about.

1) Always follow the money
2) Life is all about incentives. People will invariably do that which you incentivize them to do
 
What is surprising is that you seem surprised. Anytime you put out free money from others regardless the good intentions this is what you get.

The most nefarious thing is that you invariably hire people to administer said programs whose job security now rests in more and more people being dependent on the programs, so they become part of the problem.

There are two axioms in life that will serve people well and they are true no matter what business or endeavor you are talking about.

1) Always follow the money
2) Life is all about incentives. People will invariably do that which you incentivize them to do

BINGO! But then, uninformed Liberal dunces are always surprised when people scam the Government out of money.

Similar to how dunces like Obama and Hildebeast were shocked that our diplomatic mission would be attacked by those "ungrateful" Lybians; after all, Obama cared so much!!!
 
BINGO! But then, uninformed Liberal dunces are always surprised when people scam the Government out of money.

Similar to how dunces like Obama and Hildebeast were shocked that our diplomatic mission would be attacked by those "ungrateful" Lybians; after all, Obama cared so much!!!


Well I find it interesting that you never hear private entities saying "We need to cut expenses by weeding out fraud, waste and abuse". Now that is not to say that fraud, waste and abuse doesn't occur in private entities, just that it is much more rampant with the gobblement
 
Well I find it interesting that you never hear private entities saying "We need to cut expenses by weeding out fraud, waste and abuse". Now that is not to say that fraud, waste and abuse doesn't occur in private entities, just that it is much more rampant with the gobblement

I don't know what private entities you are speaking of, but my experience suggests that private entities take great effort at rooting out fraud and controlling expenses; otherwise, they won't be in business for very long. Government doesn't have that limitation; it has no competition and the waste is charged to we, the sheeple.
 
faux outrage. it's easy to identify once you see people dismiss the corruption and criminality over benghazi yet vilify lane closures on a bridge as if it were the holocaust
 
court-scam.jpg


DEMOCRAT



The total amount involved in the scam runs into the tens of millions of dollars, authorities said.





http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/4-surrender-social-security-scam-article-1.1568664#ixzz2pkVJM1iX
 
faux outrage. it's easy to identify once you see people dismiss the corruption and criminality over benghazi yet vilify lane closures on a bridge as if it were the holocaust

Faux outrage, really? That's rich coming from you. This spite move had an impact on real people but I guess that doesn't matter as long as you can compare apples and oranges, huh. What was that woman who died, chopped liver?

"In newly disclosed emails, officials appeared to show little regard for the real-world impact their stunt would have on local residents — and in fact were seen gloating about inconveniencing schoolchildren because they come from Democratic families. But according to a new report from The Record in Bergen County, due to the traffic caused by the unannounced bridge closures last September, emergency personnel had difficulty responding to at least four medical situations, including one involving a 91-year-old woman who lay unconscious and later died at an area hospital."

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20...closures-led-emergency-response-delays-death/
 
Faux outrage, really? That's rich coming from you. This spite move had an impact on real people but I guess that doesn't matter as long as you can compare apples and oranges, huh. What was that woman who died, chopped liver?

"In newly disclosed emails, officials appeared to show little regard for the real-world impact their stunt would have on local residents — and in fact were seen gloating about inconveniencing schoolchildren because they come from Democratic families. But according to a new report from The Record in Bergen County, due to the traffic caused by the unannounced bridge closures last September, emergency personnel had difficulty responding to at least four medical situations, including one involving a 91-year-old woman who lay unconscious and later died at an area hospital."

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20...closures-led-emergency-response-delays-death/

First off - it's been reported that the lady in question died at her home, prior to being transported.
2nd - You seem to be suggesting that the death of those in Benghazi, didn't have an "impact on real people". :palm:
 
Christiekins doesn't seem to want to discuss the thread topic anymore now that a central figure in the fraud has been identified as a Democrat...
 
Back
Top