IRS abuse investigator is an Obama donor

It's awesome to know that when I'm in office I can just hire supporters to "investigate" and all the leftists will tell me that it doesn't matter.
 
maineman said:
and you think that anyone who contributes to a political campaign is ethically barred from doing that? why?
Click to expand...

No dunce; what normal thinking people are saying is that it gives the appearance of cronyism. Therefore, you should NEVER hire a donor to investigate impropriety within your administration because it smells bad.

But alas, you're a dishonest, illiterate, repugnant dunce desperately trying to remove any doubt about your special brand of stupid you bring to any thread debate.
 
maineman said:
why are you afraid to just answer my question?

Have YOU ever contributed to a political campaign? Do you think that that fact makes you ethically ineligible to serve in an administration run by the candidate you contributed to?
Click to expand...

Dear dunce; it is not about "serving", it is about "investigating" impropriety. But thanks again for illustrating what a dishonest dunce you really are.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
It's a classic case of projection.

Since most conservatives are your run of the mill, unethical, dishonest "do as I say and not as I do" kind of folk, they just naturally assume everyone else is JUST LIKE THEM.
Click to expand...

Yeah that's got to be what it is dunce; after all, Democrats are as pure as freshly fallen snow right? :wink wink:

God you buffoons are incredibly stupid and dishonest.
 
But how can we trust what Darrell Issa has to say on the matter? Clearly, he's partisan. I mean, if we're going to throw out whatever anyone has to say about Obama because they are Democrats or have liberal views (the folks at snopes, this investigator, anyone affiliated with any Annenberg Foundation project whatsoever), shouldn't we also throw out whatever Republicans and right-wingers say, too? And where does that leave us?
 
maineman said:
so... no political donors should ever be allowed to work for the department of justice, I take it?
Click to expand...

Wrong again dunce; political contributors should never be assigned an investigatory role in Government.

You're still too stupid to comprehend the debate aren't you dunce? Or perhaps just too dishonest.
 
aeprga said:
But how can we trust what Darrell Issa has to say on the matter? Clearly, he's partisan. I mean, if we're going to throw out whatever anyone has to say about Obama because they are Democrats or have liberal views (the folks at snopes, this investigator, anyone affiliated with any Annenberg Foundation project whatsoever), shouldn't we also throw out whatever Republicans and right-wingers say, too? And where does that leave us?
Click to expand...

We don't need to "trust" what Issa says, we just need to trust the evidence and proper ethical conduct of an investigation into the facts. In order to do this, you do not assign political cronies to the task, but impartial investigators.

Why is the OBVIOUS so difficult for Liberals to comprehend?
 
aeprga said:
But how can we trust what Darrell Issa has to say on the matter? Clearly, he's partisan. I mean, if we're going to throw out whatever anyone has to say about Obama because they are Democrats or have liberal views (the folks at snopes, this investigator, anyone affiliated with any Annenberg Foundation project whatsoever), shouldn't we also throw out whatever Republicans and right-wingers say, too? And where does that leave us?
Click to expand...

If you have anything from Issa that is untrue then let's see it.
 
aeprga said:
Oh, I see. A Democrat can't properly investigate the Obama Administration but a Republican can because QED.
Click to expand...

Wrong again dunce; a donor should not be investigating the party the donor supports and contributes to for the sake of integrity.

You people really are dishonest dunces.
 
maineman said:
if you have any evidence that the friendships, political beliefs and affiliations of the investigator have altered the course of her investigation, then let's see it.
Click to expand...

I think Issa has spelled that out for everyone; you're just too stupid and dishonest to acknowledge it.

I can't begin to imagine if this were a Republican Adminstration under the same circumstances how the whiney lefttards would be shrieking about impropriety.
 
maineman said:
if you have any evidence that the friendships, political beliefs and affiliations of the investigator have altered the course of her investigation, then let's see it.
Click to expand...

The investigator is biased and you are dishonest for supporting a biased investigator. People like you are the problem.
 
Truth Detector said:
I think Issa has spelled that out for everyone; you're just too stupid and dishonest to acknowledge it.

I can't begin to imagine if this were a Republican Adminstration under the same circumstances how the whiney lefttards would be shrieking about impropriety.
Click to expand...

bullshit. Issa cited ZERO evidence that Bosserman's political contributions altered the course of her investigation in any way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top