A simple question really...
To save on gas, pollution, etc. why isn't the left driving for incentives for companies to have people work from home whenever possible?
In this day and time, meetings can be held over the interwebs, training can be done with web meetings, you can watch whatever somebody does on your computer at their house, and what they run over your VPN network they use to log in, phone service can be delivered anywhere (also over the interwebs).
Why do we insist that people must work in some box in a city, and why wouldn't we want them to stay put so they don't pump CO2 into the air? Is it that cost incentives to push companies into making such a "responsible" choice would cost too much in revenue? Where is the drive by this President, and others who believe that their car causes cold weather in winter, to get companies to require people to drive less?
To save on gas, pollution, etc. why isn't the left driving for incentives for companies to have people work from home whenever possible?
In this day and time, meetings can be held over the interwebs, training can be done with web meetings, you can watch whatever somebody does on your computer at their house, and what they run over your VPN network they use to log in, phone service can be delivered anywhere (also over the interwebs).
Why do we insist that people must work in some box in a city, and why wouldn't we want them to stay put so they don't pump CO2 into the air? Is it that cost incentives to push companies into making such a "responsible" choice would cost too much in revenue? Where is the drive by this President, and others who believe that their car causes cold weather in winter, to get companies to require people to drive less?