Marry girls when they're '15 or 16,' said 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson???

So, your not going to answer my question? Telling!

Ditto, Counselor.

Weren't you arguing recently that it was OK for an 18-year old to have sex with a 14-year old?

And since you and your fellow leftist witch-finders have not proven Mr. Robertson had sex with his future wife before she married him, what's your issue?
 
I think its immoral to talk racist crap.

why does Phil do that?

why is he a race baitor?

Dear dunce; Phil didn't do that. Hate mongering Liberals inferred it from his comments. Thank you again for being the poster dunce for Liberal dimwits who still have no clue what the definition of "racist" is and instead, use it as a political hammer further diminishing its meaning.
 
Ditto, Counselor.

Weren't you arguing recently that it was OK for an 18-year old to have sex with a 14-year old?

And since you and your fellow leftist witch-finders have not proven Mr. Robertson had sex with his future wife before she married him, what's your issue?

My issue was exactly what I asked you... Are you arguing that the law is the ultimate arbitrator of morality? I understand your desire to deflect and try to change the issue, because you don't what to answer the question.
 
My issue was exactly what I asked you... Are you arguing that the law is the ultimate arbitrator of morality? I understand your desire to deflect and try to change the issue, because you don't what to answer the question.

Still dodging, eh, Counselor?

It would seem difficult for you to condemn Mr. Robertson while excusing your own behavior...
 
Still dodging, eh, Counselor?

It would seem difficult for you to condemn Mr. Robertson while excusing your own behavior...

1) I simply asked a question and have not gotten an answer.
2) I have not condemned the duck guy.
 
My issue was exactly what I asked you... Are you arguing that the law is the ultimate arbitrator of morality? I understand your desire to deflect and try to change the issue, because you don't what to answer the question.

Dear dunce; what laws or morality did Phil violate? Please discuss and provide proof that laws were broken and what laws they were.

Then, when you are done, assuming you can comprehend the actual arguments and false claims being hurled by Leftist dullards, you can explain how common law has no link to religious morality.

Carry on.
 
Dear dunce; what laws or morality did Phil violate? Please discuss and provide proof that laws were broken and what laws they were.

Then, when you are done, assuming you can comprehend the actual arguments and false claims being hurled by Leftist dullards, you can explain how common law has no link to religious morality.

Carry on.

You again, have refused to answer my one single simple question.

I never claimed Phil violated any law or morality.
 
I never claimed anyone here cared about how I feel...that was just Y-O-U ducking my questions again.

You remember, right?

I asked you:



And then you oh so thoughtfully replied:



It appears it is Y-O-U who has repeatedly engaged in the "whiney bullshit" so maybe for once Y-O-U could drop it and actually answer my question.

You're truly a dunce of epic proportions. Who is guilty of pedophilia you moron?

You're an incredibly dishonest dunce who wants to debate strawmen you fabricate in a dishonest attempt to deflect from your own stupidity.

Yes, you really are THAT repugnant and THAT stupid and typify the dishonest lying mentality of leftist dimwits.
 
Back
Top