Fox News Remains Ratings Champ As 2013 Comes to Close

Its ironic that the more the pinheads bitched about Fox the more viewers tuned in....and most stayed....
Election year being over so ALL lost viewers, understandable....

The only surprise to me was MSNBC beating CNN in prime time by a mere 1%.....who the hell are the pinheads watching ?
No surprise O'Reilly is #1...its the best show on the TV for the time slot.....and like the man says, "We're lookin' out for you"....

Fux is propaganda! And as Hannah Arendt noted in The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951): "The effectiveness of this kind of propaganda demonstrates one of the chief characteristics of the modern masses. They do not believe in anything visible, in the reality of their own experience; they do not trust their eyes and ears but only their imaginations, which may be caught by anything that is at once universal and consistent in itself. What convinces masses are not facts, not even invented facts, but only the consistency of the system of which they are presumably part. Repetition, somewhat overrated in importance because of the common belief in the masses' inferior capacity to grasp and remember, is important only because it convinced them of consistency in time.

What the masses refuse to recognize is the fortuitousness that pervades reality. They are predisposed to all ideologies because they explain facts as mere examples of laws and eliminate coincidences by inventing an all embracing omnipotence which is supposed to be at the root of every accident.
...
In other words, while it is true that the masses are obsessed by a desire to escape from reality because in their essential homelessness they can no longer bear its accidental, incomprehensible aspects, it is also true that their longing for fiction has some connection with those capacities of the human mind whose structural consistency is superior to mere occurrence. The masses' escape from from reality is a verdict against the world in which they are forced to live and in which they cannot exist, since coincidence has become its supreme master and human beings need the constant transformation of chaotic and accidental conditions into a man-made pattern of relative consistency."

Arendt's analysis probably goes a long way in explaining the reason why at this particular historical juncture this particular channel with it's specific propaganda model has been able to capture a particular segment of the masses and hold their attention. In other words, it is the audience that needs to be addressed not the channel! Those who watch are there for a reason that has little to do with what is being produced and more to do with their own unfulfilled psychological and material needs!
 
Fox is propaganda! And as Hannah Arendt noted in The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951): "The effectiveness of this kind of propaganda demonstrates one of the chief characteristics of the modern masse. They do not believe in anything visible, in the reality of their own experience; they do not trust their eyes and ears but only their imaginations, which may be caught by anything that is at once universal and consistent in itself. What convinces masse are not facts, not even invented facts, but only the consistency of the system of which they are presumably part. Repetition, somewhat overrated in importance because of the common belief in the masses' inferior capacity to grasp and remember, is important only because it convinced them of consistency in time.

What the masses refuse to recognize is the fortuitousness that pervades reality. They are predisposed to all ideologies because they explain facts as mere examples of laws and eliminate coincidences by inventing an all embracing omnipotence which is supposed to be at the root of every accident.
...
In other words, while it is true that the masses are obsessed by a desire to escape from reality because in their essential homelessness they can no longer bear its accidental, incomprehensible aspects, it is also true that their longing for fiction has some connection with those capacities of the human mind whose structural consistency is superior to mere occurrence. The masses' escape from from reality is a verdict against the world in which they are forced to live and in which they cannot exist, since coincidence has become its supreme master and human beings need the constant transformation of chaotic and accidental conditions into a man-made pattern of relative consistency."

Arendt's analysis probably goes a long way in explaining the reason why at this particular historical juncture this particular channel with it's specific propaganda model has been able to capture a particular segment of the masses and hold their attention. In other words, it is the audience that needs to be addressed not the channel! Those who watch are there for a reason that has little to do with what is being produced and more to do with their own unfulfilled psychological and material needs!
Are you a book editor?
 
1489054_10202833448022284_320328525_n.jpg


:rofl2:
 
The best thing about Fox is how it drives hate filled brain dead Liberals even crazier than they already are.

This from the man who is deluded enough to believe that invasive transvagina probes are an example of "small government" and without the slightest hint of irony goes on to say that "Democrats" live in a "real fantasy world"--whatever the fuck that is--as compared I guess to a fantasy "fantasy world"!

And then he claims liberals are "brain dead." I could go on, but he only wrote a single insipid sentence.
 
if you get your news from fox you need to find a place to then get FACTS from because fox doesn't include those in their news


Is that just math you do to make republicans feel better?
 
Fox News Channel maintained its grip on the cable-news network ratings prize in 2013, drawing more viewers than the combined averages of CNN, MSNBC and HLN.

It was a down year in terms of overall audience, as every newsie but HLN showed primetime declines from their Presidential Election-driven tallies of 2012.

According to Nielsen data through Dec. 8, Fox News Channel averaged 1.774 million viewers in primetime (down 13% from 2012) and 297,000 adults 25-54 (down 30%). It was followed by MSNBC with 645,000 viewers and 203,000 adults 25-54 (down 29% in both); CNN with 578,000 (down 15%) and 187,000 adults 25-54 (down 16%); and HLN with 403,000 total viewer (up 21%) and 142,000 in the demo (up 27%).

Among all basic cable networks in 2013, FNC ranked sixth in primetime while MSNBC was 29th and CNN was 31st. In total day, Fox ran fourth while CNN was 28th and MSNBC ran 30th; in 2012, CNN finished behind MSNBC. CNN and HLN showed some year-over-year gains on a total-day basis, while FNC and MSNBC were down.

Fox and CNN both made some significant changes to their lineup in 2013, with FNC’s revamped primetime lineup, introduced on Oct. 7, posting gains in both total viewers and adults 25-54 vs. the block’s 2013 season-to-date average. The newest program, “The Kelly File” with Megyn Kelly, has improved the 9 p.m. hour by 23% in total viewers and 13% in adults 25-54, and “The O’Reilly Factor” is the top show in cable news (2.78 million, 439,000 adults 25-54).

http://variety.com/2013/tv/news/fox-news-remains-ratings-dynamo-as-2013-comes-to-close-1200964903/

:rofl2:

I see why Media Matters said the war on Fox is over, they surrendered!!!

Let's put this bullshit in perspective shall we! And this is why I don't care much. And others shouldn't either. Fux has 1.7 viewers out of 315 million people. That works out to something like 6 tenths of 1 percent of the population is listening to their bullshit. That's a little over half of 1 percent of the population. So you Fux viewers are not only the dumbest you are apparently the dumbest of the dumb--how elite is that? Pat yourselves on the back, you are in the bottom 1 percent!
 
some people don't get much choice which they can watch with their basic cable package.


just because they watch doesn't make them tea tards.

I used to listen to Rush all the time to hear what the cons were saying.


Oh and BTW elections matter more than viewership in this country
 
some people don't get much choice which they can watch with their basic cable package.


just because they watch doesn't make them tea tards.

I used to listen to Rush all the time to hear what the cons were saying.


Oh and BTW elections matter more than viewership in this country

As to your last statement here it's a good thing, because 6 tenths of 1 percent doesn't win a lot of elections.
 
I love foxes

they are beautiful creatures.

Did you know someone has begun domesticating them in Russia I believe it is.


can you imagine having a pet that was a fox ion the outside and acted like a dog.

Damn I want one
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domesticated_silver_fox


The domesticated silver fox (marketed as the Siberian fox) is a domesticated form of the silver morph of the red fox. As a result of selective breeding, the new foxes became tamer and more dog-like.

The result of over 50 years of experiments in the Soviet Union and Russia, the breeding project was set up in 1959[1] by Soviet scientist Dmitri Belyaev. It continues today at The Institute of Cytology and Genetics at Novosibirsk, under the supervision of Lyudmila Trut.
 
Back
Top