No hugs allowed?

[USFREEDOM911]

No hugs allowed? Madison tries to regulate a business that offers professional cuddlers

Wisconsin's ultra-liberal capital city is a place where just about anything goes, from street parties to naked bike rides. But city officials say a business is pushing even Madison's boundaries by offering, of all things, hugs.

For $60, customers at the Snuggle House can spend an hour hugging, cuddling and spooning with professional snugglers.

Snugglers contend touching helps relieve stress. But Madison officials suspect the business is a front for prostitution and, if it's not, fear snuggling could lead to sexual assault...

 

[Anti-Party]

I think you small brains need to learn what the definition is of the terms you sling around. It's been proven you don't know what Socialism and Communism is solidly.

Now I see you posting about "Liberals" and "Wisconsin's ultra-liberal capital city is a place where just about anything goes"

Most turd brains think that Liberalism is an excessive amount of Government that tries too hard to control population. Here it seems that "anything goes, except for a stance against an obvious business trying to break the law" is Liberal.

You do realize that it doesn't matter what party you are in, if the majority wants a law and that law is in place, it's still law correct? You realize that backing that law isn't "Liberal" correct?

Not too smart kid.

 

[Anti-Party]

I mean if you think that the business that sells "snuggles" and isn't a fabric softner is really selling snuggles, you aren't too bright kiddo. I've made posts before about making prostitution legal, but when it's not legal I'm not going to try to criticize people for stopping it. This is basic ignorance.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I mean if you think that the business that sells "snuggles" and isn't a fabric softner is really selling snuggles, you aren't too bright kiddo. I've made posts before about making prostitution legal, but when it's not legal I'm not going to try to criticize people for stopping it. This is basic ignorance.

So thinking something might lead to prostitution automatically makes it prostitution; is that what you're understanding of the article was?

 

[Damocles]

Clearly this is just a gateway hug that will lead to heavier forms of prostitution....

 

[Anti-Party]

So thinking something might lead to prostitution automatically makes it prostitution; is that what you're understanding of the article was?

I have no doubt that you think they were just selling hugs kiddo.

Note that the Left is more open to Prostitution talks than the Right. But if it's not legal you cant be so dumb as to proclaim "hey, look at these people busting obvious prostitution." It's basic nonsense.

 

[Anti-Party]

Clearly this is just a gateway hug that will lead to heavier forms of prostitution....

So Damocales thinks they are actually selling hugs. Noted.

I love to make notes of the people stupid enough to believe that "selling hugs" is a business other than prostitution. I'll put them in the advanced uneducated folder.

If you believe in the freedom then just say it like I did. If you are trying to be political and trying to act like this isn't a prostitution ring then you are just a pathetic weakness to America.

Take a stand and stop using these medians for small gains because it actually makes you lose progress.

 

[Spirited]

No proof of any kind that prostitution has ever been an outcome, or a part of this somewhat kooky business model. Just more big government interference.

http://thesnugglehouse.org/

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I have no doubt that you think they were just selling hugs kiddo.

Note that the Left is more open to Prostitution talks than the Right. But if it's not legal you cant be so dumb as to proclaim "hey, look at these people busting obvious prostitution." It's basic nonsense.

Can you show one single incident, in the article, that supports the idea they were attempting prostitution?