Substitutes for fossil fuels.

Ha! Yeah, that was classic!

I there was a story, quite a while back, that some ducks mistook some solar panels and crash landed into them.
The assumption was that they must have thought it was a pond of water, with the sun reflecting off of it.
Can you imagine huge rows of solar panels and the possibility that birds would think it was a lake.
 
Your premise is laughable and as I said you have ZERO knowledge about thermodynamics. Since I personally use solar and hydro, I am probably a bit more knowledgable about it than you are. The cost to outfit my year round home would be cost prohibitive. As I said, for my mountain retreat, I am willing to accept the added cost.

There is ZERO unsubsidized wind in the United States. Comparing government subsidized wind to the massive cost prohibitive regulations being placed on coal is a charade of monumental proportions and could only be put forth by a blooming idiot or a partisan hack with an alternative agenda.

In a true free market, fossil fuels would rule. For no other reason than the laws of thermodynamics. Now, you can allow your ignorance to drive your cost of living up, but it is sickening that you would force your polluted, failed ideology on others.

What is funny is that you eco terrorists don't even walk your own walk. Here a fossil fuel lover like me uses more alternative energy than you do. No go wrap your partisan hack brain around that one for a while

Maybe you can explain why everyone here is switching to solar? If it is cost prohibitive? Sorry my eyes are the facts. Some people are actually MAKING money by consuming less energy then they make and selling the excessive energy production back to the grid!

2nd? The article states that IN AUSTRALIA? UNSUBSIDIZED wind energy is cheaper then subsidized fossil fuel energy. Now tell me? Are the Australians smarter then Americans?

In a true free market, Alternative energy technology would be cheap and most people would own electric cars, have a solar panel and windmill on their property and be most if not fully, energy indepependant! But then the capitalists would be booted off their gravy train and they don't want that!! Greed prevents progress unless they can somehow find a way to profit from progress!

If everyone could afford eco friendly technology, most would use it. I hear in china they already have lots of electric bikes.

http://designmind.frogdesign.com/blog/chinas-electric-bike-charging-cultures.html

You want to sound like you know everything but you are behind in the eco-technology info curve.lol
 
Last edited:
It is plainly obvious to me that you have the greatest difficulty comprehending what the article was saying. It, in essence, states that wind and solar power are erratic and not predictable. 75% of the electricity production in Germany is used by industry that requires an ultra stable supply with constant voltage and frequency. Now that they have set their face against nuclear due to the loony Greens they are turning to coal instead to provide a reliable baseload. Of course they should have just consulted you and not listened to their energy experts.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/04/23/germany-to-open-six-more-coal-power-stations-in-2013/

Nope. It is you that reads what you want to read. But it didn't say what you wanted it to say.lol

This second article is actually quite amusing.lol Ok here are some questions for you. What is supplying most of the energy in Germany today? Nuclear. Now the article suggests they want to close down nuclear power plants and open coal power plants because they are afraid of a Japan type Tsunami?? ROTFLOL!!!!

What a joke! Then the article states that wind energy will only supply a quarter of the power needed and in the same article states the problem is it supplies TOO MUCH energy?lol

Did you read the comments? Smart people are mocking the move and calling it a step backward for Germany.lol Then again, you must understand that Germans are heavily invested in fossil fuel energy. Therefore it is in their interest to move backwards.

In America they say natural gas is replacing the coal industry.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/11/b...uses-for-natural-gas.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0


Oh well. France and Russia can lead the world in Nuclear energy technology. :)
 
Last edited:
Don't you think if it was cheaper and more efficient, the capitalists would not only buy up the alternative energy companies, but maybe bring in a bunch of wage slaves to exploit? It makes no sense to buy up the technology and infrastructure that would bring them huge profits, and then just sit on it. This is reminiscent of the "100 mpg carburetor" back in the 1970's. You're a socialist in a western country(which could also mean you're young and still ignorant)so you might remember that fable. You might also want to consider that Obama invested OPM(Other People's Money)heavily in the solar industry. We are still waiting for news that one of those companies lasted for more than a year or so. The lesson here is, capitalists wouldn't touch this(according to you)great investment opportunity with a 10 foot pole. On the other hand, socialists(in the form of the Obama administration)invested in these turkeys like a 16 year old girl with daddy's credit card. And it was an abject failure like all things socialist. And here's a tip regarding your computer: Explore your God-given talents and abilities and discover how best to utilize them to feed, clothe and shelter yourself and your family, and if along the way you find that you are serving humanity at the same time, BONUS!! If you try to do this, you may find that one day, even being a wage slave member of the proletariat in the struggle against the running dog imperialist bourgeois capitalist pigs, that you can afford 3 computers, a top of the line smartphone, a big screen TV, a gas guzzling muscle car, a Harley and a bunch of other toys to occupy myself when I'm not wage-slaving!

When you understand there is nothing more profitable then oil, then you will start to understand. Solar energy does not allow then to control the source. Which is the Sun.

They have suppressed solar cell technology since the 60's! Though they have used it to power their oil platforms out at sea. Would you like me to provide the article?

Oh and? There were many rumors of engines that would never break down. Many mechanics swear by it, and these vehicles were discontinued because it is ant-capitalist/profit. Also rumors of cars that ran off of water. Also even though Obama's solar company failed? Most of his green technology investments, DID NOT, but the MAIN STREAM media wont tell you that! The reason it failed is because America cant compete with Asian cheap labor.
 
Last edited:
When you understand there is nothing more profitable then oil, then you will start to understand. Solar energy does not allow then to control the source. Which is the Sun.

They have suppressed solar cell technology since the 60's! Though they have used it to power their oil platforms out at sea. Would you like me to provide the article?

Oh and? There were many rumors of engines that would never beak down. Many mechanics swear by it, and these vehicles were discontinued because it is ant-capitalist/profit. Also rumors of cars that ran off of water. Also even though Obama's solar company failed? Most of his green technology investments, DID NOT, but the MAIN STREAM media wont tell you that! The reason it failed is because America cant compete with Asian cheap labor.

I don't want you to get the idea that I'm against alt energy. The more alt energy, the more gas for my guzzlers. And as long as US workers price themselves out of the market, your socialist comrades in China are going to continue to be worked to death in iPad factories, and unemployed Americans are going to demand more entitlements so they can feel more "equal" to the rich.
 
When you understand there is nothing more profitable then oil, then you will start to understand. Solar energy does not allow then to control the source. Which is the Sun.

They have suppressed solar cell technology since the 60's! Though they have used it to power their oil platforms out at sea. Would you like me to provide the article?

Oh and? There were many rumors of engines that would never break down. Many mechanics swear by it, and these vehicles were discontinued because it is ant-capitalist/profit. Also rumors of cars that ran off of water. Also even though Obama's solar company failed? Most of his green technology investments, DID NOT, but the MAIN STREAM media wont tell you that! The reason it failed is because America cant compete with Asian cheap labor.

This ought to be moved to the Conspiracy thread,
 
This ought to be moved to the Conspiracy thread,

Tom. You may fool the naïve with your mis-information but you cant fool me.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell

Navigation market

SPC approached companies making navigational buoys as a natural market for their products, but found a curious situation. The primary company in the business was Automatic Power, a battery manufacturer. Realizing that solar cells MIGHT EAT INTO THEIR battery profits, Automatic purchased the rights to earlier solar cell designs and SUPPRESSED them. Seeing there was no interest at Automatic, SPC turned to Tideland Signal, another battery company formed by ex-Automatic managers. Tideland introduced a solar-powered buoy and was soon ruining Automatic's business.

But then ARCO bought them out and kept it further suppressed in the name of profits.
 
Tom. You may fool the naïve with your mis-information but you cant fool me.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell

Navigation market

SPC approached companies making navigational buoys as a natural market for their products, but found a curious situation. The primary company in the business was Automatic Power, a battery manufacturer. Realizing that solar cells MIGHT EAT INTO THEIR battery profits, Automatic purchased the rights to earlier solar cell designs and SUPPRESSED them. Seeing there was no interest at Automatic, SPC turned to Tideland Signal, another battery company formed by ex-Automatic managers. Tideland introduced a solar-powered buoy and was soon ruining Automatic's business.

But then ARCO bought them out and kept it further suppressed in the name of profits.

Have you got a Wiki entry for the engine that runs on water?
 
gta vice city is overrated so far. I really prefered gta III and san andreas way more. hopefully it gets better.
 
Don't you think if it was cheaper and more efficient, the capitalists would not only buy up the alternative energy companies, but maybe bring in a bunch of wage slaves to exploit? It makes no sense to buy up the technology and infrastructure that would bring them huge profits, and then just sit on it. This is reminiscent of the "100 mpg carburetor" back in the 1970's. You're a socialist in a western country(which could also mean you're young and still ignorant)so you might remember that fable. You might also want to consider that Obama invested OPM(Other People's Money)heavily in the solar industry. We are still waiting for news that one of those companies lasted for more than a year or so. The lesson here is, capitalists wouldn't touch this(according to you)great investment opportunity with a 10 foot pole. On the other hand, socialists(in the form of the Obama administration)invested in these turkeys like a 16 year old girl with daddy's credit card. And it was an abject failure like all things socialist. And here's a tip regarding your computer: Explore your God-given talents and abilities and discover how best to utilize them to feed, clothe and shelter yourself and your family, and if along the way you find that you are serving humanity at the same time, BONUS!! If you try to do this, you may find that one day, even being a wage slave member of the proletariat in the struggle against the running dog imperialist bourgeois capitalist pigs, that you can afford 3 computers, a top of the line smartphone, a big screen TV, a gas guzzling muscle car, a Harley and a bunch of other toys to occupy myself when I'm not wage-slaving!



then why is solar growing?
 
Back
Top