Things Have Gotten Better, But Does That Matter?

Dantès

New member
This is a good antidote for those who claim that sure racism still exists but things have gotten better! Have they and so what if they have! The fact is that the structural and legal barriers still exist and the right is currently doing everything they can to continue to disfranchise women and minorities from Texas to Wisconsin and Pennsylvania! So what difference does it make if instead of talking about the problems that remain we concentrating on how far we've come. We have nearly ended slavery, we think. And that's cool isn't it! OK, then!

Yes, America Has Gotten Better About Racism, but It Really Doesn’t Matter
Mychal Denzel Smith on November 22, 2013 - 2:17 PM ET

Because I write about race and racism in the United States, I’m often asked some variation of this question: are things better now?

I don’t mean to be condescending when I answer, but usually my response is frustrated laughter followed by a firm “no.” It’s the most polite thing I can think to do in the moment. At least, it’s more polite than saying, “That’s a stupid fucking question.”

But that’s how I actually feel. It sounds harsh, but I truly believe “Are things better?” is one of the most useless questions in a discussion about racism. It’s another in a repertoire of rhetorical tricks we use in this country to avoid the hard work of addressing racism in its modern form. By reframing the conversation around how much progress has been made, we further the false narrative that racism is a problem that belongs to history. While we pat ourselves on the back for not being as horrible as we once were, we allow racism to become further entrenched in every aspect of American life.

Of course we’re doing better than chattel slavery. Of course we’re doing better than legal segregation. But what material benefit do we get from the comparison?

What good is better to Renisha McBride, Trayvon Martin or Aiyana Stanley-Jones? Does better bring back Jordan Davis, Rekia Boyd and Jonathan Ferrell? Do the millions of black youth who experience stop-and-frisk console themselves by noting how much better things have gotten since the 1860s? Is chronic unemployment made better because there are no longer “whites only” signs decorating the South? Will children in Chicago, Philadelphia and DC sleep well at night knowing that even though their schools are closing and their educational opportunities are being ripped away from them, things are better? Does a racist, for-profit, prison-industrial complex really count as better?

That’s what gets swept aside when we focus so much of the narrative of progress. We absolve the evil of racism in its current form. I don’t wish to contend that we should not look back at our history. We should, and often. Nor am I saying we shouldn’t celebrate our progress. There’s nothing inherently wrong with doing so. But I do believe we keep relearning the wrong lesson.
When we look at how far we’ve come, we conveniently omit what got us here: the tireless and thankless work of people with a radical vision of a society based on fairness, the blood of young people willing to die for their right to assert themselves as full human beings, and a mix of compassion and political opportunism that turned powerful people into unlikely allies. And it will likely take more of the same to get us where we need to go.



http://www.thenation.com/blog/17733...n-better-about-racism-it-really-doesnt-matter
 
I'm all raced out. I don't care anymore. If it is as the author states, and racism in it's "modern form" is still rampant, then I will leave it to others to joust at those windmills. You can write laws, you can protest, you can elect a black dictator to the highest office in the land(twice), it won't matter unless hearts are changed and we must do that ourselves, on our own. I try to do it by practicing the golden rule. It can really be that simple.
 
I'm all raced out. I don't care anymore. If it is as the author states, and racism in it's "modern form" is still rampant, then I will leave it to others to joust at those windmills. You can write laws, you can protest, you can elect a black dictator to the highest office in the land(twice), it won't matter unless hearts are changed and we must do that ourselves, on our own. I try to do it by practicing the golden rule. It can really be that simple.

You aren't trying very hard when you use the term "black dictator" about our legally-elected POTUS.
 
I'm all raced out. I don't care anymore. If it is as the author states, and racism in it's "modern form" is still rampant, then I will leave it to others to joust at those windmills. You can write laws, you can protest, you can elect a black dictator to the highest office in the land(twice), it won't matter unless hearts are changed and we must do that ourselves, on our own. I try to do it by practicing the golden rule. It can really be that simple.

You don't seem to know what a dictator is. Or what dictation is. It's a simple word search kid.

It's when Congress/President stand against what the people want.

Learn more about this and you will notice the Right is and has been WAY MORE dictatorship style than the Left. They don't seem to care what the people want, they just want to win.
 
Caeser was legally elected. Stalin was legally elected. Saddam hussein was legally elected...

And Romney was NEARLY Elected.

The funny part is the turds that almost put him there are still calling for Dictatorship and think that the people who want "healthcare, housing and food" for others are the dictators. The Dictators are the ones who live like kings and keep all the money and leave little of it distributed throughout the land. Very few people should have access to almost all money is the Ceasar/Saddam/KING method. Wake up kid.
 
You don't seem to know what a dictator is. Or what dictation is. It's a simple word search kid.

It's when Congress/President stand against what the people want.

Learn more about this and you will notice the Right is and has been WAY MORE dictatorship style than the Left. They don't seem to care what the people want, they just want to win.

I'm not going to quibble with you over definitions. This thread is about racism and all I am saying is that regardless of what anyone says or does to fight it, those who feel "oppressed" are going to move the goal post. They will never be satisfied as long as some bleeding heart neo-comm is willing to throw other peoples money at them in the name of "income equality" and "wealth redistribution". I tell you, the only answer is the golden rule.
 
I'm all raced out. I don't care anymore. If it is as the author states, and racism in it's "modern form" is still rampant, then I will leave it to others to joust at those windmills. You can write laws, you can protest, you can elect a black dictator to the highest office in the land(twice), it won't matter unless hearts are changed and we must do that ourselves, on our own. I try to do it by practicing the golden rule. It can really be that simple.

It gets done when people REFUSE racists ideas asnd point out every fucking incident of it and proudly announce THIS SHALL NOT STAND!


I will fight racism till the day Im cold and in the ground


willingly , lovinginly and without FAIL
 
I'm not going to quibble with you over definitions. This thread is about racism and all I am saying is that regardless of what anyone says or does to fight it, those who feel "oppressed" are going to move the goal post. They will never be satisfied as long as some bleeding heart neo-comm is willing to throw other peoples money at them in the name of "income equality" and "wealth redistribution". I tell you, the only answer is the golden rule.


sorry racists you are just feeling the effects of so much tar gulping
 
your not going to win anything in this world anymore being the racist party.

It is NOW and FOREVERMORE a losing ass position.

keep fucking yourself
 
And Romney was NEARLY Elected.

The funny part is the turds that almost put him there are still calling for Dictatorship and think that the people who want "healthcare, housing and food" for others are the dictators. The Dictators are the ones who live like kings and keep all the money and leave little of it distributed throughout the land. Very few people should have access to almost all money is the Ceasar/Saddam/KING method. Wake up kid.

Another incredibly ignorant rant from the forums Communust turd. I'm amused that ignoramuses like you think that it is not dictatorial to believe that you and the leftist political turds you elect presume to dictate that those who earn great wealth should be forced by threat of imprisonment to give up their wealth because your leftist political turds need to re-distribute that wealth in order to fool gullible dimwits into electing them.

Hugo Chavez uttered similar moronic rhetoric and then implemented it in Venezeula; how is that wealth redistribution working for the poor there?

I find that only uneducated dullards who are economically clueless can utter such buffoonish nonsense that you spam this forum with and vote for inexperienced clueless arrogant hyper partisan asshats like Obama and Biden; because they are really THAT stupid.

People are not prevented from obtaining wealth in this country; and there is nothing dishonorable about not wanting wealth. Some of the wealthiest individuals in this nation started from nothing and as they created wealth for themselves thanks to an idea or product they worked tireless hours on, brought a lot of wealth to others.

You see dimwit, the economic pie is not something that is finite, it is infinate. If you had a historic clue, which apparently you do not, those societies that dabbled in dimwitted socialism with this "fairness" stupidity have failed their citizens miserably as a result of such ignorant beliefs.

One does not become better off by taking what others have; they do so through education, creativity and hard work. Anyone can do this; but not if the State becomes the arbiter of what is fair and equal.

Dimwitted arrogant leftist like you always presume you care more for the little guy while electing dimwits who tell idiots like you what you want to hear to get elected, then implement policies that merely make everyone more miserable rather than improve ones economic lot in life.
 
I'm not going to quibble with you over definitions. This thread is about racism and all I am saying is that regardless of what anyone says or does to fight it, those who feel "oppressed" are going to move the goal post. They will never be satisfied as long as some bleeding heart neo-comm is willing to throw other peoples money at them in the name of "income equality" and "wealth redistribution". I tell you, the only answer is the golden rule.

I disagree with the bolded part; this thread is really about the ignorance of race hustling fools defending an ideological failure through lying, deflecting, obfuscating and fabricating their own version of reality.
 
It gets done when people REFUSE racists ideas asnd point out every fucking incident of it and proudly announce THIS SHALL NOT STAND!


I will fight racism till the day Im cold and in the ground


willingly , lovinginly and without FAIL

Thanks, Self Righteous Girl, leaves me more time for important stuff. Oh, the dry cleaners called, your cape is ready. Now hop in the smugmobile and go fight racism. I'm going to take a nap.
 
the people elected Obama

Not so with your guys

Dimwits elected Obama. People so incredibly naive and stupid that they actually believed a hollow campaign slogan called "hope and change" was substance.

But your an empty headed gullible fool; of course you think it was substance. You really are THAT incredibly stupid.
 
Back
Top