Social Conservatives Lose Again

[Timshel]

There's a difference between evolution and Darwinism. Only a mind numbed fascist robot clings to Darwinism and censors all other theories on life's origins. Darwinism is junk science disproven as such by science. Political hacks and knee jerk reactionaries shove Darwinism down the throats of American youth because it is part of the PC establishment's value system much like global warming is.

It is pretty clear that you are just mindlessly spouting platitudes. What is "Darwinism" and what part of it has been disproven? I think you are just using it as a rhetorical device to attack those who reject creationism and accept the theory of evolution.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

His theories have been proven wrong and obsolete. Single cell animal structures do not exist but this debunked theory is still being pushed because it supports the notion of no intelligent creation.

Darwinism has as much scientific validity as creationism does.

Single cell animal structures don't exist? What about the cells nucleus? What about mitochondria? What about ribosomes? What about golgi bodies? What about microtubules? What about endoplasmic reticulum? what about the phospholipid bilaminar plasmalemma (aka cell membrane)?

Do you even know what the hell you are talking about

 

[Mott the Hoople]

There's a difference between evolution and Darwinism. Only a mind numbed fascist robot clings to Darwinism and censors all other theories on life's origins. Darwinism is junk science disproven as such by science. Political hacks and knee jerk reactionaries shove Darwinism down the throats of American youth because it is part of the PC establishment's value system much like global warming is.

Really? The please tell me...what is this "Darwanism"? Please be specific. Why isn't it science?

 

[evince]

Here is a good source on some of the many predictions Darwin made that have been proven true.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/pred-nf.html

but that is all sceincey


he wont like that

 

[philly rabbit]

It is pretty clear that you are just mindlessly spouting platitudes. What is "Darwinism" and what part of it has been disproven? I think you are just using it as a rhetorical device to attack those who reject creationism and accept the theory of evolution.

You're certainly entitled to your opinion but I have yet to mention creationism or the Bible and what I have done instead is turn the tables on you and explain that your evolutionary belief system is scientifically extinct.

Unless you want to continue to insist that Darwin's natural selection theories have been validated by anything else besides a political agenda mainly science itself because science has already debunked Darwin's 19th century theories because of his ignorance of multi celled animal structures.

 

[philly rabbit]

Single cell animal structures don't exist? What about the cells nucleus? What about mitochondria? What about ribosomes? What about golgi bodies? What about microtubules? What about endoplasmic reticulum? what about the phospholipid bilaminar plasmalemma (aka cell membrane)?

Do you even know what the hell you are talking about

Are Darwin's theories on natural selection scientifically prudent and verified?

Answer: no

Why not?

Answer: Because science has determined them to be outdated and obsolete.

But you Mott The Leftal will continue to ram Darwinism down the throats of American youth because the theories seemingly disprove an intelligent creator while I keep telling you that quite frankly, you're full of shit.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Are Darwin's theories on natural selection scientifically prudent and verified?

Answer: no

Why not?

Answer: Because science has determined them to be outdated and obsolete.

But you Mott The Leftal will continue to ram Darwinism down the throats of American youth because the theories seemingly disprove an intelligent creator while I keep telling you that quite frankly, you're full of shit.

Please....tell me....a person with a graduate education in human biology. How has science determined it to be outdated and obsolete?

 

[philly rabbit]

Please....tell me....a person with a graduate education in human biology. How has science determined it to be outdated and obsolete?

Tell me why you can't admit that Darwin's theories are obsolete?

You're not hesitant in debunking other 19th century theories like blacks are inferior to whites and homosexuality is a mental illness so why are you so persistent with outdated scientific theories like Darwin offered?

 

[Mr.Badguy]

SOME of Darwin's theories are indeed obsolete, but for all the stuff he got right and the fact that his theories laid the groundwork for more study and more discoveries, makes him worthy of admiration.

The other theories you mention come from a place of ignorance and prejudice, and never had any REAL scientific backing.

 

[Timshel]

You're certainly entitled to your opinion but I have yet to mention creationism or the Bible and what I have done instead is turn the tables on you and explain that your evolutionary belief system is scientifically extinct.

Unless you want to continue to insist that Darwin's natural selection theories have been validated by anything else besides a political agenda mainly science itself because science has already debunked Darwin's 19th century theories because of his ignorance of multi celled animal structures.

You have not explained anything. Your claims are completely lacking in substance. First you said single celled animal structures posed some problem now you are claiming it is multi celled organism, without any explanation of what it is you are driving at.

Natural selection has been proven true as a mechanism for evolution as has his ideas concerning sexual selection. There are numerous examples.

http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/curiosity/topics/10-examples-natural-selection.htm

Many times a species is forced to make changes as a direct result of human progress. Such is the case with the peppered moth (Biston betularia). Up until the Industrial Revolution, these moths were typically whitish in color with black spots, although they were found in a variety of shades. As the Industrial Revolution reached its peak, the air in London became full of soot, and the once-white trees and buildings that moths used for camouflage became stained black. The birds began to eat more of the lighter-colored moths because they were more easily spotted than the darker ones. Over the course of a few months, dark moths started appearing in the area and lighter moths became scarce. Once the Industrial Revolution peak passed, lighter moths made a comeback.

 

[SJJRSJJS]

Are you claiming there are no single celled organisms?

How uppity and arrogant of you Dingas, to have those advertising links to your Liberal Brothas websites at the bottom of all your posts, like you are challenging this Forum. They are ad links and ads are forbiddon on this Forum. You Libs tell everyone else how to act, to follow the/your rules, but you go right ahead and break the rules, and that is why I call you and your Lib cohors, Hippocrats. You are a Fool.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Tell me why you can't admit that Darwin's theories are obsolete?

You're not hesitant in debunking other 19th century theories like blacks are inferior to whites and homosexuality is a mental illness so why are you so persistent with outdated scientific theories like Darwin offered?

I see...nice evasion. I figured you couldn't answer my question. I'll at least give you the courtesy of answering yours. Because Darwins theory of biological evolution by natural selection is not obsolete. In fact it is foundational to the understanding of all the biological sciences and some of the most important scientific discoveries in the history of humanity have resulted from the application of this theory.

Now, would you please answer my question?

 

[Mott the Hoople]

How uppity and arrogant of you Dingas, to have those advertising links to your Liberal Brothas websites at the bottom of all your posts, like you are challenging this Forum. They are ad links and ads are forbiddon on this Forum. You Libs tell everyone else how to act, to follow the/your rules, but you go right ahead and break the rules, and that is why I call you and your Lib cohors, Hippocrats. You are a Fool.

How do you know Haza is a "liberal"? How does believing in accepted science make one a liberal?

 

[The Dude]

Nice Neanderthal Burn!

 

[SJJRSJJS]

How do you know Haza is a "liberal"? How does believing in accepted science make one a liberal?

The ads are to Lib websites, enough said, ad links are against Forum rules...capisce? I am turning Dingle's Commie ass into Forum management so Digle can get his sheet straightened out, and the ads will be taken off.

The problem with your Forum Libs is that they are getting their asses handed to them when that abortion named ObamaCare becomes the center of conversation on this Forum. Of course you Libs are constantly trying to change the subject about ObamaCare, because you cannot defend this Administration's repeated blunders. Libs will go the way of the Dinosaurs, better sooner than later.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

The ads are to Lib websites, enough said, ad links are against Forum rules...capisce? I am turning Dingle's Commie ass into Forum management so Digle can get his sheet straightened out, and the ads will be taken off.

The problem with your Forum Libs is that they are getting their asses handed to them when that abortion named ObamaCare becomes the center of conversation on this Forum. Of course you Libs are constantly trying to change the subject about ObamaCare, because you cannot defend this Administration's repeated blunders. Libs will go the way of the Dinosaurs, better sooner than later.

Really? How can that be so when most of the tenent of the ACA are Republican ideas?

How comes these are great ideas when Republican propose them and an abortion when Democrats adopt them?

I mean you are aware that for years Republicans insisted on a universal mandate as a starting point for health care reform and Dems fought them for years in favor of a single payer system? You did know that didn't you?

 

[Timshel]

The ads are to Lib websites, enough said, ad links are against Forum rules...capisce? I am turning Dingle's Commie ass into Forum management so Digle can get his sheet straightened out, and the ads will be taken off.

The problem with your Forum Libs is that they are getting their asses handed to them when that abortion named ObamaCare becomes the center of conversation on this Forum. Of course you Libs are constantly trying to change the subject about ObamaCare, because you cannot defend this Administration's repeated blunders. Libs will go the way of the Dinosaurs, better sooner than later.

The Institute for Justice is a libertarian civil liberties group. The Institute for Humane Studies is affilated with the Mercatus Center, and supports libertarian students in humanities and social sciences. Vitamin Angels is a non political charity providing essential vitamins to malnourished children and adults.

They have been in my signature for years. It is not a commercial ad, which is what I always assumed the rule to imply. I am not telling anyone what to do. If Damo feels I am violating the rules he can let me know.

You are the one trying to change the subject.