For Darla... three articles on Krugman from Huffpost...

tekkychick said:
Because I'm not wasting my time reading the articles.
Click to expand...

So again, you all result to pathetic ad hom attacks and ignore the actual substance of the articles because you refuse to read anything that may contradict your views of Krugman. Understood... next time just say 'I am a lemming and incapable of rational discussion'. It will save time.
 
Superfreak said:
The above is precisely the nonsense that Krugmanites display time and again. Attacks on Ferguson and now on me. All because Darla cannot refute anything that was written in the articles. Typical liberal nonsense.
Click to expand...

Man, I wish it was Monday... :)
 
Darla said:
Okay thanks, can I return it for some boots?
Click to expand...

(Speaking of boots, they arrived yesterday!)

1991872-p-MOBILETHUMB.jpg



Now back to the topic... Krugman rocks!
 
Superfreak said:
So again, you all result to pathetic ad hom attacks and ignore the actual substance of the articles because you refuse to read anything that may contradict your views of Krugman. Understood... next time just say 'I am a lemming and incapable of rational discussion'. It will save time.
Click to expand...

I don't bother reading gothic romances either. Why would I read someone written by someone I KNOW isn't credible?

I don't read flat earther materials either.
 
Niall Ferguson did an excellent series of TV programmes called the Ascent of Money, it should be required viewing for the economically challenged.
 
tekkychick said:
I don't bother reading gothic romances either. Why would I read someone written by someone I KNOW isn't credible?

I don't read flat earther materials either.
Click to expand...

Except that you are WRONG. He is most certainly credible. That does not mean he is infallible. You refuse to read him because you KNOW YOU are wrong and don't want to have to admit it.
 
Dungheap said:
I'd hate to suggest that you are overcompensating for something, but . . .
Click to expand...

Well of course you would dimwit; you're really THAT stupid. Too bad you don't have anything to compensate for it....like a brain.

I'm still waiting for a reasonably coherent answer of how Krugman isnt an incredibly stupid economist who still believes that Government can spend its way out of a recession and how that has worked for America.
 
Truth Detector said:
Well of course you would dimwit; you're really THAT stupid. Too bad you don't have anything to compensate for it....like a brain.

I'm still waiting for a reasonably coherent answer of how Krugman isnt an incredibly stupid economist who still believes that Government can spend its way out of a recession and how that has worked for America.
Click to expand...


Re: the bold. Try holding your breath.
 
Dantès said:
I think you are the dimwit here dimwit, because it you weren't so dim you would know that in fact none of Krugman's suggestions have been taken up or even seriously considered by the current administration. But thanks for playing. You have shown that like the rest of the Teabagger faction on the right here you know nothing about the topic or the subject. And if you read Niall Ferguson you still won't know anything about it. If you really want to know what Krugman thinks and suggests read his books. I bet you haven't read a book since The Little Engine That Could (1930). So if you're ever really curious read Krugman and you'll that everything you are saying here is wrong, dimwit!
Click to expand...

Now you're not just a dimwit, by a lying little asshat. Krugman himself has debated the stimulus and argued for it. He has even stated that the only reason it hasn't worked is that it wasn't enough.

But then, you're a dimwit. Dimwits don't think; they have no brains. Therefore they act like trained circus monkeys sitting on the shoulder of their DNC trainers sticking their grubby little hands out.

Now run along little dimwitted monkey, your trainers are calling. I think they have some new brain dead talking points to feed you.

I'll be here when you decide to act like an adult and explain coherently why Naiilis wrong about Krugman though; but a shan't hold my breath. After all...you're a dimwit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top