Prove the US is lying about who used the chemical weapons on whom

evince said:
bac it was a claim they were hearing from the people.


maybe you don't understand that rape has been used as a weapon in war all through mans history.

Maybe you don't understand what it feels like to report rape and be treated like a liar.
Click to expand...

THAT'S BULLSHIT. PURE BULLSHIT.

Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch found no evidence of mass rape.

Susan Rice NEVER PRESENTED ANY EVIDENCE OF HER CLAIM.

You're doing the teabagger two-step .. and yes, you would have supported the war on Iraq.
 
evince said:
rapes were being reported.


they stood by the women reporting them by treating the claims as valid claims.

then it was investigated and they could not find the evidence to support wide spread rape policy by the military of sadam.



It was NOT used to make the vote the vote had already taken place.


It was a crime investigation in which Rice took the claims seriously until they were investigated.

THAT IS NOT A LIE.


why are you doing this?
Click to expand...

You're doing the Philly Rabbit.

No matter how many times truth is presented to you, you'll just keep on repeating the same thing.
 
blackascoal said:
THAT'S BULLSHIT. PURE BULLSHIT.

Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch found no evidence of mass rape.

Susan Rice NEVER PRESENTED ANY EVIDENCE OF HER CLAIM.

You're doing the teabagger two-step .. and yes, you would have supported the war on Iraq.
Click to expand...



why say that you KNOW I didn't support the Iraq war
 
evince said:
yes after they looked


which was after Rice talked about it
Click to expand...

It was a total and complete fabrication and when it was shown that absolutely no evidence supported the claim they simply ignored the reality which only convinces the True Believer like you Desh.
 
evince said:
rice talking about rape like its real is NOT a lie.

why are you doing this?
Click to expand...

I'm doing this because I hate war and warmongers.

I didn't vote for Obama .. ever .. I am not a democrat. I have the freedom and willingness to speak truth as I see it .. you do not.
 
evince said:
Its NOT our war

Its a civil war


let them fight it out.


WITHOUT the dictator just Killing his opposition with chemicals
Click to expand...


tell us, are the civilians/opposition any less dead from a bullet or conventional bomb?

Either you go in and remove him or you stay the fuck out of it. You don't half ass it. If you remove him, you better be looking to see who is ready to step up to fill the power vacuum or you end up with another Egypt.
 
It was reported by citizens on the ground.

It was a claim taken seriously until it was investigated.

The investigators themselves said not having the evidence to PROVE it was happening doesnt mean it didn't take place
 
Superfreak said:
tell us, are the civilians/opposition any less dead from a bullet or conventional bomb?

Either you go in and remove him or you stay the fuck out of it. You don't half ass it. If you remove him, you better be looking to see who is ready to step up to fill the power vacuum or you end up with another Egypt.
Click to expand...


a bullet kills one person.

gas kills the babies inside the house your fighting in front of and the babies in the next one and the next one and the next one and the next oine and the next one......................................on and on
 
cawacko said:
I actually thought of you bac when I saw this chart as I believe you've talked about it.


http://www.slate.com/blogs/business_insider/2013/09/02/democrats_deserted_the_anti_war_movement.html
Click to expand...

:0) Thanks

Although it wasn't that specific chart, I have indeed talked about how democrats abandoned the antiwar movement as soon as Obama became president.

Look around this board. Almost every democrat who whined and cried about Bush and Iraq are now all gung ho to blow up some innocent Syrians .. and they didn't give a rats about innocent Libyans.

Not a peep out of 'em while Obama blows up Pakistani women, children, and babies into tiny pieces.
 
blackascoal said:
:0) Thanks

Although it wasn't that specific chart, I have indeed talked about how democrats abandoned the antiwar movement as soon as Obama became president.

Look around this board. Almost every democrat who whined and cried about Bush and Iraq are now all gung ho to blow up some innocent Syrians .. and they didn't give a rats about innocent Libyans.







Not a peep out of 'em while Obama blows up Pakistani women, children, and babies into tiny pieces.
Click to expand...






Innocent Syrians is why people back this.



The dems are not anti military actions when needed.

They are anti being LIED to about the causes of the need.



war for nothing or oil or money is evil.


dropping bombs on the delivery system that would disperse gas on innocent people is not what you claim it is
 
evince said:
a bullet kills one person.

gas kills the babies inside the house your fighting in front of and the babies in the next one and the next one and the next one and the next oine and the next one......................................on and on
Click to expand...

Again Desh, are the people any less dead? You also ignore that conventional bombs also kill innocent children in homes and the ones next door and so on. Are they any less dead?

What about the 100k or so reported dead already prior to the use of chem weapons?

Also... for someone who demanded to see the evidence that was used to support the claims of Bush for Iraq... you sure are going easy on Obama providing the same evidence to justify lobbing missiles into Syria. Obama doesn't even have a clear objective... another thing Bush fucked up and you held him to account for... yet you give Obama a pass.
 
evince said:
give me some fucking proof


all you people have been saying it now for days.

PRODUCE some evidence or shut the fuck up
Click to expand...

Common Sense tells intelligent people that if the rest of the world won't support attacking Syria for gassing it's people, there's not enough reason for us to attack.

Why isn't your god wanting to attack N. Korea, or countrys in the middle east for the tyranny they're committing? Well,,,,, one is a socialist country, and the others are muslims. I heard this weekend, (I was surprised, and don't know if it's true) that Assad is known for protecting christians. That would explain your gods wanting to attack Syria, but ignore others he agrees with.
 
Liberty said:
Common Sense tells intelligent people that if the rest of the world won't support attacking Syria for gassing it's people, there's not enough reason for us to attack.

Why isn't your god wanting to attack N. Korea, or countrys in the middle east for the tyranny they're committing? Well,,,,, one is a socialist country, and the others are muslims. I heard this weekend, (I was surprised, and don't know if it's true) that Assad is known for protecting christians. That would explain your gods wanting to attack Syria, but ignore others he agrees with.
Click to expand...



go away you stupid fuck the adults are talking
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top