Will Obama unilaterally attack Syria?

Big Money

New member
Like Clinton attacked Bosnia?


Barack%20and%20Bill%20818.jpg
 
Nope. All those guns to them rebels; who are currently getting pushed back. He lost the attempt to control Syria.

Perhaps their buddies in Russia will forgive us.
 
My apologies to Sesame Street and all children aged 2-5 who watch it who have a better grasp of world affairs than the whiz kid.
 
As President Obama weighs options for responding to a suspected chemical weapons attack in Syria, his national security aides are studying the NATO air war in Kosovo as a possible blueprint for acting without a mandate from the United Nations.






http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/world/air-war-in-kosovo-seen-as-precedent-in-possible-response-to-syria-chemical-attack.html?pagewanted=all
 
Well Kids, today we learn Howey is a bit . . . introverted, to the point of ignorance.

http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt...russia&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-144
http://news.yahoo.com/syria-ally-russia-urges-cooperation-un-202005928.html

I'd Let me google that for you, but I think Grind used one today.

BEIRUT (AP) — Russia on Friday added its diplomatic weight to demands for a swift probe into an alleged chemical weapons attack that has injected new vigor into calls for international military action in Syria's civil war.
 
Unless something changes here quickly, I think Obama will take the NATO OK, and hit with a few missiles. Sort of Clinton like and the aspirin or baby formula factory.

Then he will say Assad learned his lesson.

Then the US will be further diminished internationally.

JFK actually learned from the Bay of Pigs. While a debacle, he owned it. When the Missile Crisis came, he knew he was being pushed to the wall, because of previous failure. He coupled strength with finesse and paved a way for future talks. Will Obama finesse? Not looking like.
 
Back
Top