Employment and the Minimum Wage

So now it appears that McDonald didn't say what Tekky presented; but instead you want to link to a group of OP, in order to try and save face. :palm:

I asked you and the OP or anyone a question kid. You avoided it. You stated, "don't avoid the topic" when my topic was the thread and yours was about a grudge match.

Why avoid questions? If you are correct, then you should be able to answer ALL QUESTIONS.
 
What is McDonalds saying when they set up a bogus budget and tell folk to get 2nd jobs?

Correct.
If you can't live off of what you make, from one job, then either work 2 or find a different one.

The first OP states $7.50 an hour.
Last time I checked, $7.50 x 40 = $300 @ week.
Multiply that by 4 weeks and it comes to $1,200 @ month or $15,600.00 a year.
The Federal Poverty Guidelines have a single person at $11,490 @ year.
 
I asked you and the OP or anyone a question kid. You avoided it. You stated, "don't avoid the topic" when my topic was the thread and yours was about a grudge match.

Why avoid questions? If you are correct, then you should be able to answer ALL QUESTIONS.

Since when do you, kid, get to decide that the proper form of exchange is to ignore the questions that make you uncomfortable and to then request that others respond to your questions?

You won't answer this question, Kiddo.
 
maybe it was their own "learn how to budget" thingy they passed out to their employees?

you know the one that JUST ASSUMES you have a second job.
 
Wasn't his question to answer, was it?

Edit: Google works...try it sometime.

http://www.google.com/search?client...1.23.mobile-gws-serp..14.36.13832.vDXIqpU3ytg

It wasn't really that hard to google, was it, Steelplate? Why are USF and Patriot so offended that I expect them to google that if they hadn't already heard all about it in the news and on this board? I would no more think I have to give them a link saying the current president is Obama than I would think I have to give them a link about the McD's budget.

If they had taken all that typing they did about me and instead did a search, their curiosity would have been resolved.
 
I guess along with being unable to google, USF and Patriot need some help in reading comprehension.

Here you go, guys:

> McD's puts out a sample budget
> The sample budget assumes more income than McD's pays
> THEREFORE - read between the lines here - McD is saying you can't live on what they pay.
 
I guess along with being unable to google, USF and Patriot need some help in reading comprehension.

Here you go, guys:

> McD's puts out a sample budget
> The sample budget assumes more income than McD's pays
> THEREFORE - read between the lines here - McD is saying you can't live on what they pay.


LOL LMFAO, ROTFL, Idiots.
 
LOL, Tekkybitch's mouth wrote a check her ass can't cash...she claimed McDonald's AGREES it doesn't pay enough. No such agreement exists.

I own her.

Here, Tekkybitch:

BBB.jpg


Apply liberally.
 
It wasn't really that hard to google, was it, Steelplate? Why are USF and Patriot so offended that I expect them to google that if they hadn't already heard all about it in the news and on this board? I would no more think I have to give them a link saying the current president is Obama than I would think I have to give them a link about the McD's budget.

If they had taken all that typing they did about me and instead did a search, their curiosity would have been resolved.

Or it could just be that you know your "facts" are nothing more then OP written by someone who you support.

By the way, is Howard back yet?
 
I guess along with being unable to google, USF and Patriot need some help in reading comprehension.

Here you go, guys:

> McD's puts out a sample budget
> The sample budget assumes more income than McD's pays
> THEREFORE - read between the lines here - McD is saying you can't live on what they pay.

If someone doesn't have a full time job, it would be in their best interests to have a second job.
Don't you agree?
 
Smart owners will allow it to come out of profits before letting it effect service or quality. This is the attitude that allows the creation of an economy that functions.
Okay, but lower profits mean less tax receipts for the gobblement, which means the "progressives" won't be able to give their zombies as much free stuff. Because if you raise the min. wage to $9, you have to raise everybody else's too, right? And $9 is still not a "living wage".
 
Okay, but lower profits mean less tax receipts for the gobblement, which means the "progressives" won't be able to give their zombies as much free stuff. Because if you raise the min. wage to $9, you have to raise everybody else's too, right? And $9 is still not a "living wage".

Well, you cutout the government middle man. And the money goes for actual work instead of handouts. That's better, right?

Im not a progressive. Im an american.
 
Back
Top