what are the boundaries of a neighborhood watch???????
They are not supposed to be armed and definitely not supposed to pursue a suspect.
what are the boundaries of a neighborhood watch???????
They are not supposed to be armed and definitely not supposed to pursue a suspect.
The Zimmerman-Martin issue has got to be one of the most posted about issues in JPP history (as least since I've been here). There have been thousands of posts on this story. Has another topic topped this one in terms of post numbers people can think of?
Those are not crimes. You are reaching.
Cognitive dissonance reigns supreme with the lefties. They see the case slipping away. They obviously can't admit they were duped by the media so they will find Zimmerman "guilty" of something in their minds
The big goofy cracker neighbor
Cite?
and again, IT'S NOT ILLEGAL TO FOLLOW SOMEONE. IT'S COMPLETELY IMMATERIAL TO THE CASE. THE ONLY THING THAT IS RELEVANT IS ZIMMERMANS STATE OF MIND WHEN HE PULLED THE TRIGGER.
If zimmerman believed he had a reasonable fear of great bodily injury (you know, like getting your head bashed in) he has a right to self defense, even if he follow trayvon, even if he asked trayvon what was up, even if he said "what the fuck are you doing here you asshole" even if he grabbed travyon but then made an effort to retreat.
Good the dude with the nasty facial hair!Why groan the post Dude? The claim was made that a witness recanted his testimony from yesterday. Who is it?
Who? Which witness recanted their testimony?
Why do the Zimmerman supporters insist on repeatedly dropping context?
Zimmerman behaved in a way that any rational person would expect to elicit a response. Trayvon fled and Zimmerman continued pursuing. Zimmerman even expressed concern that Martin might be listening in on the conversation with dispatch and so he clearly understood that his behavior might cause some form of retaliation. But he continued and with a deadly weapon. ZIMMERMAN put himself in danger and seemingly did not think twice about it because he was armed.
He is at least guilty of manslaughter.
The judge can't do that. The judge can only give those instructions if he's been charged with manslaughter. Otherwise I believe that would construe double jeapordy. Could one of our resident Lawyers correct me if I'm wrong?If they give the jury instructions to consider lesser charges, like manslaughter, then Zimmerman is still, probably, going to jail.
So following someone is grounds to be attacked?
Well if you stopped reading there you should go back and read my post again cause at this point this post has just proved me correct.wrong. and I stopped reading there. I do care about justice, you are just biased to the point where you are incapable of considering my point of view. The point is I believe zimmerman is 100% innocent, and that trayvon deserved to get killed, as he was a violent assaulter. Additionally I see the trayvon supporters as idiots, as those not paying attention, not knowing the facts, not understanding burden of proof, etc. I want justice more than anything in this world, and that is going to be zimmerman getting a full acquital, with me rubbing it in everyones face as a bonus.
Only if you are white, murder someoneSo following someone is grounds to be attacked?
Only if you are white, murder someone
Then need to pull a defense out your ass
Ahh, yeah I was chasing this kid down with a gun and had to shoot him when I caught up!
Yeah that's the ticket
I get out the care saying these fucking punks always get offOnly if you are white, murder someone
Then need to pull a defense out your ass
Ahh, yeah I was chasing this kid down with a gun and had to shoot him when I caught up!
Yeah that's the ticket