Issa it true lying douchebag Darrell Issa Issa lying yet again?

zappasguitar

Well-known member
Say that thread title fast enough and you sound like Jar Jar Binks from Star Wars Episode 1...

But I am afraid Issa true...Lying GOP douchebag Darrell Issa LIED AGAIN.

The bombshell IRS audit released in May omitted information about liberal groups at the request of House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA), according to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration’s office.

A spokesman for Treasury Inspector General J. Russell George told The Hill on Tuesday that Issa had requested investigators “narrowly focus on tea party organizations.”

The subsequent audit concluded the IRS used “inappropriate criteria” to single out for additional scrutiny tea party groups that applied for tax exempt status. The findings lead almost every politician, including President Barack Obama, to denounce the IRS. Several Republicans suggested the audit indicated the White House had a Nixonian “enemies list.”


Speaking to CNN on Tuesday, Issa said the IRS appeared to have been targeting Obama’s political opponents “perhaps not on his request” but “on his behalf.”

But new documents have revealed that liberal and progressive groups received similar treatment from the IRS. The “inappropriate criteria” used to single out tea party groups — so-called “Be On the Look Out” (BOLO) memos — also singled out progressive and “Occupy” groups.

“We did not review the use, disposition, purpose or content of the other BOLOs. That was outside the scope of our audit,” the Treasury inspector general spokesman told The Hill.

The BOLO memos stated tax exempt status for progressive groups “may not be appropriate” because they were engaged in “anti-Republican” political activity. On the other hand, the BOLO memos only directed IRS employees to send tea party applications to a particular group. IRS officials have said the tea party applications were “centralized” to insure they received consistent treatment. Exactly how the BOLO memos were used remains unclear.

The report identified 298 groups that were subjected to additional scrutiny, and identified 98 of those groups as either tea party, patriot or 9/12 groups. The remaining 202 groups were labelled as “other.” During congressional hearings, George was repeatedly asked if these 202 “other” groups included liberal organizations. He said he couldn’t “make that determination” based on the available evidence. However, several liberal groups received the same level of IRS scrutiny as tea party groups.

The omitted information has caused Democrats to question whether the audit was truthful.


“Failing to make this clear in these documents and at Congressional Hearings even when asked directly has been fully misleading,” Rep. Sandy Levin (D-MI) wrote in a letter to George on Wednesday. “It has contributed to the distortion of this entire investigation, including use of innuendo and totally unsubstantiated assertions of White House involvement.”

The Associated Press on Wednesday confirmed that liberal and progressive groups were subjected the same treatment that conservative groups had complained about, including excessive questioning and extremely long waits. The liberal group Catholics United, for instance, waited seven years before receiving tax exempt status, far longer than any tea party group was forced to wait.

Meanwhile, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration’s office has continued to defend its audit of the IRS. Karen Kraushaar told the Associated Press that the inspector general was only “asked to look at the treatment of organizations known to be affiliated with the tea party in its review, and was asked to audit the way those organizations were being treated when they applied for tax-exempt status.”


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/...al-to-ignore-irs-treatment-of-liberal-groups/
 
As the facts come out, we are increasingly seeing that there was never a White House Scandal. Its the same every time you see the Republicans going crazy about a scandal before many of the facts come out.

They get a headline, then that headline leads to NADA. Its the same with Bill Ayers, the Birth Certificate, Benghazi, IRS and surveillance.
 
As the facts come out, we are increasingly seeing that there was never a White House Scandal. Its the same every time you see the Republicans going crazy about a scandal before many of the facts come out.

They get a headline, then that headline leads to NADA. Its the same with Bill Ayers, the Birth Certificate, Benghazi, IRS and surveillance.


Of course I take great joy in watching their flailing about desperately trying to find a "scandal" they think will stick and gain some traction.

But it's this desperation that leads them to jump at anything that might be the least bit harmful to Obama and that is just sad.
 
Say that thread title fast enough and you sound like Jar Jar Binks from Star Wars Episode 1...

But I am afraid Issa true...Lying GOP douchebag Darrell Issa LIED AGAIN.



The Associated Press on Wednesday confirmed that liberal and progressive groups were subjected the same treatment that conservative groups had complained about, including excessive questioning and extremely long waits. The liberal group Catholics United, for instance, waited seven years before receiving tax exempt status, far longer than any tea party group was forced to wait.

Meanwhile, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration’s office has continued to defend its audit of the IRS. Karen Kraushaar told the Associated Press that the inspector general was only “asked to look at the treatment of organizations known to be affiliated with the tea party in its review, and was asked to audit the way those organizations were being treated when they applied for tax-exempt status.”


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/...al-to-ignore-irs-treatment-of-liberal-groups/

Looks like the lying hypocrites are the AP, rawstory and Zippy....
Read it an weep...
http://tinyurl.com/o7c66dc
 
Looks like the lying hypocrites are the AP, rawstory and Zippy....
Read it an weep...
http://tinyurl.com/o7c66dc

Typical...the partisan Rightie reads what he wants to see into the article.

Apparently he missed this section of the article HE posted:

"But he later said there was “a diversity of political labels” among the groups whose applications were set aside for further review.

Some progressive groups seeking tax-exempt status have complained about facing lengthy delays and detailed questions from the IRS.

It is unclear whether progressive groups faced the same extent of mistreatment as conservative organizations. Dozens of them ran into delays exceeding a year, and many received scores of detailed questions that officials have since said were overly intrusive, including demands for information about their donors."
 
Typical...the partisan Rightie reads what he wants to see into the article.

Apparently he missed this section of the article HE posted:

"But he later said there was “a diversity of political labels” among the groups whose applications were set aside for further review.

Some progressive groups seeking tax-exempt status have complained about facing lengthy delays and detailed questions from the IRS.

It is unclear whether progressive groups faced the same extent of mistreatment as conservative organizations. Dozens of them ran into delays exceeding a year, and many received scores of detailed questions that officials have since said were overly intrusive, including demands for information about their donors."


Well, then how about THIS....

http://tinyurl.com/o4xe9ef

Does the truth really bother you that much ?
 
Well, then how about THIS....

http://tinyurl.com/o4xe9ef

Does the truth really bother you that much ?


As usual...when they can't handle the truth, angry conservatives like to parse words and split hairs so they can continue to believe whatever particular fantasy has blown their skirts up.

"The Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration (TIGTA) sent a letter Wednesday to congressional Democrats telling them that while several liberal groups may have gotten extra scrutiny, the IRS didn’t necessarily target those — but it did do so for conservative groups.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...s-conservatives-not-liberals-w/#ixzz2XRalIQqD
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter"


Right there, in the article NOVA loves so much...Democrat groups received extra scrutiny.

EOS.
 
As usual...when they can't handle the truth, angry conservatives like to parse words and split hairs so they can continue to believe whatever particular fantasy has blown their skirts up.

"The Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration (TIGTA) sent a letter Wednesday to congressional Democrats telling them that while several liberal groups may have gotten extra scrutiny, the IRS didn’t necessarily target those — but it did do so for conservative groups.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...s-conservatives-not-liberals-w/#ixzz2XRalIQqD
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter"


Right there, in the article NOVA loves so much...Democrat groups received extra scrutiny.

EOS.

Only because you're kinda stupid, I'll explain it to you.

Conservative groups did have their tax-exempt status delayed or did face some additional scrutiny, but not a single group has been denied tax-exempt status.

Why ?....Because if they were denied, they could then appeal the denial....so they were ignored and harrassed, neither denied nor approved, just held in a kind of limbo for years....some over 3 years.....and when asked for a number that won approval at the Senate hearings, the IRS could not or would not supply an answer.

and the progressive groups ?...some were scrutinized of course ( they could have been right wing impostors ), but they were not ignored. They were approved for the most part, usually within 90 days, give or take, and I can not find even one that denied tax exemption or held without a decision for any excessive length of time........
and now you know how it worked....
 
Only because you're kinda stupid, I'll explain it to you.

Conservative groups did have their tax-exempt status delayed or did face some additional scrutiny, but not a single group has been denied tax-exempt status.

Why ?....Because of they were denied, they could appeal the denial....so they were ignored and harrassed, neither denied nor approved, just held in a kind of limbo years....
some over 3 years.....

and the progressive groups ?...some were scrutinized of course ( they could have been impostors ), but they were not ignored. They were approved for the most part, usually within 90 days, give or take, and I can not find even one that denied tax exemption or held without a decision for any excessive length of time........


First, you tried to pretend no progressive groups got scrutinized...you said so yourself.

Then we found out they did in fact get scrutinized.

Now you want to move the goalposts and try again to make it a big deal because some groups had to WAIT A BIT LONGER than others.

OH THE HORROR!!

You said it yourself..."not a single group has been denied tax-exempt status."

Maybe one of these days you will quit your whining long enough to uncover the truth.
 
Back
Top