Time for a Special Prosecutor... right Desh?

Cancel 2016.2

Cancel 2016.2

The Almighty
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institute...titute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1899

Well, we obviously can't go against the majority now can we Desh? Time to appoint the special prosecutor the American public majority wants!

American voters say 76 - 17 percent, including 63 - 30 percent among Democrats, that a special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate charges the Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative groups, according to a Quinnipiac University national poll released today.
Click to expand...

I am sure we will once again be informed by the Obama Apologists Squad that there is nothing to see here.
 
Well, one of the 118 times the guy visited the white house there was a huge crowd, that means that none of the visits could possibly have been about important stuff.
 
Damocles said:
Well, one of the 118 times the guy visited the white house there was a huge crowd, that means that none of the visits could possibly have been about important stuff.
Click to expand...

I am sorry, you need at least another ten people cheering the same fact for it to be an official 'skewering'.
 
One thing everyone is learning about liberals in the government: They like to cheat as much as possible.
One thing everyone is learning about liberal voters: They don't care about rules.
 
One thing everyone is learning about liberals in the government: They like to cheat as much as possible.
One thing everyone is learning about liberal voters: They don't care about rules.
 
Damocles said:
Well, one of the 118 times the guy visited the white house there was a huge crowd, that means that none of the visits could possibly have been about important stuff.
Click to expand...

And certainly, the other 117 were clandestine meeting where they went over plans to target conservative groups in great detail.

One would have to be a hack to not think so.
 
Some things I've pondered..

Conservatives say it's okay to profile Middle Eastern types at the airport because of 9/11.

Conservatives say it's okay to profile Hispanic types anywhere because they might be illegal immigrants.

Conservatives say it's okay to profile African-Americans because they're nothing but welfare kings and queens living off the government.

Conservatives say it's NOT okay to profile Tea Party types even though their entire mission is based on paying as little tax as possible, and even openly brag about cheating the IRs.

Go figure.
 
Actually, I am not against the Special Prosecutor in this case. It does not make sense to have the IRS investigate itself. The more honest investigations the better. The full truth should be told.

Now if its a Ken Starr investigation that will turn into a sexual witch hunt, id probably be against that.
 
Damocles said:
Well, one of the 118 times the guy visited the white house there was a huge crowd, that means that none of the visits could possibly have been about important stuff.
Click to expand...

Silly, nobody made such an argument, in fact it was Candy who made the opposite argument, that just because the guy went to the WH 118 times, the President must have known about the IRS scandal.
 
10 signs that a scandal isn't going away:



Ten signs a scandal isn’t going away
By Jennifer Rubin, Updated: May 30, 2013
In this Sunday, May 19, 2013, photo provided by CBS News White House senior advisor DanPfeiffer speaks on CBS's "Face the Nation" in Washington. Pfeiffer was scheduled to appear on five Sunday news shows Sunday, where he stated no senior officials were involved in the decision to give tea party groups extra scrutiny by the IRS. (AP Photo/CBS, Chris Usher)

White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer on CBS’s “Face the Nation” in on May 19. (Chris Usher/CBS via Associated Press)

Liberal sycophants in the media have been insisting the Obama administration scandals (three if you count only the Internal Revenue Service, Department of Justice and and Benghazi, Libya, scandals; four if you add the Department of Health and Human Services) will fade away. If anything, the controversies are intensifying. How can you tell the scandals aren’t vanishing?

1. The White House refers questions about possible perjury back to the accused’s own department.

2. You throw a spin session and major media outlets won’t show up.

3. Even Democrats want a special prosecutor. (“A Quinnipiac University poll released on Thursday shows 76 percent want a special counsel to 17 percent opposing. The idea has strong support across all parties, with 88 percent of Republicans, 63 percent of Democrats and 78 percent of independents calling for a special prosecutor.”)

4. Even Vice President Biden knows to stay out of sight. (Where’s he been the last couple of weeks?)

5. It is hard to tell House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia (“lost focus,” “disconnected”) from New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd (“wistful and petulant aren’t getting him anywhere”).

6. Losing on gun legislation is the least of his worries.

7. Conservatives love watching Jon Stewart these days.

8. Headlines from the New York Times (“Holder Faces New Round of Criticism After Leak Inquiries”) are interchangeable with headlines from Right Turn.

9. Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley isn’t nuts to consider a presidential run in 2016.

10. Eric Holder has become less credible than Jay Carney.
Click to expand...

Ah yes, links at each point at site.
 
LOL Jennifer Rubin. I sent her an email once, a very nice one, pointing out that her article was factually wrong, and showing her why. She sent me back the nastiest response. I laughed. Imagine writing for a national newspaper and behaving like a JPP poster? That's what her response was like. So I responded that I was terribly sorry she felt that way, she sounded to me as if she was under a tremendous amount of strain, and that I would say a prayer for her. She answered me again calling me a vicious liberal or something like that. It was hilarious.

She's a vituperative liar though.
 
Darla said:
LOL Jennifer Rubin. I sent her an email once, a very nice one, pointing out that her article was factually wrong, and showing her why. She sent me back the nastiest response. I laughed. Imagine writing for a national newspaper and behaving like a JPP poster? That's what her response was like. So I responded that I was terribly sorry she felt that way, she sounded to me as if she was under a tremendous amount of strain, and that I would say a prayer for her. She answered me again calling me a vicious liberal or something like that. It was hilarious.

She's a vituperative liar though.
Click to expand...

That was certainly wrong of her, we agree.

So which of her points are you taking issue with?
 
Darla said:
LOL Jennifer Rubin. I sent her an email once, a very nice one, pointing out that her article was factually wrong, and showing her why. She sent me back the nastiest response. I laughed. Imagine writing for a national newspaper and behaving like a JPP poster? That's what her response was like. So I responded that I was terribly sorry she felt that way, she sounded to me as if she was under a tremendous amount of strain, and that I would say a prayer for her. She answered me again calling me a vicious liberal or something like that. It was hilarious.

She's a vituperative liar though.
Click to expand...


Ok Darla... if you say so... lets just take your word for it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top