If accurate... wow...

So, I have another question.....

What difference does it make if the attacks were protests inspired by a video or not?

Wouldn't they be terrorism either way?

Is one better than the other for any reason?
 
Damocles said:
The problem isn't the attack so much as the "It's all due to the video!" nonsense that followed, a compliant media supported one of the stupidest explanations ever given feeding the low information voter some of the most obvious disingenuous nonsense I've encountered since Nixon.

Now we find out the IRS is doing the same crap it was doing for Nixon for this guy too... His latest "I didn't know" crap even reminded me of Nixon's "I am not a crook" speech.
Click to expand...

LMAO

Awesome. Post of the day...easily.
 
Damocles said:
The problem isn't the attack so much as the "It's all due to the video!" nonsense that followed, a compliant media supported one of the stupidest explanations ever given feeding the low information voter some of the most obvious disingenuous nonsense I've encountered since Nixon.

Now we find out the IRS is doing the same crap it was doing for Nixon for this guy too... His latest "I didn't know" crap even reminded me of Nixon's "I am not a crook" speech.
Click to expand...

I find the IRS shit despicable, however, I am giving the President the benefit of the doubt that he did not know. If he did he should be impeached. But to not reserve judgement until there is some evidence is disingenuous, and speaks of hackery.
 
Bfgrn said:
tumblr_mh3zovPoup1qztsh3o1_500.jpg
Click to expand...

on how which of those occasions did the government deny there was an attack?......
 
Damocles said:
The problem isn't the attack so much as the "It's all due to the video!" nonsense that followed, a compliant media supported one of the stupidest explanations ever given feeding the low information voter some of the most obvious disingenuous nonsense I've encountered since Nixon.

Now we find out the IRS is doing the same crap it was doing for Nixon for this guy too... His latest "I didn't know" crap even reminded me of Nixon's "I am not a crook" speech.
Click to expand...

How is this kind of worldview even possible?
 
Damocles said:
The problem isn't the attack so much as the "It's all due to the video!" nonsense that followed, a compliant media supported one of the stupidest explanations ever given feeding the low information voter some of the most obvious disingenuous nonsense I've encountered since Nixon.

Now we find out the IRS is doing the same crap it was doing for Nixon for this guy too... His latest "I didn't know" crap even reminded me of Nixon's "I am not a crook" speech.
Click to expand...

Oh, so you know who did it, why they did it and what their motives were? I've been waiting for an answer...it's been 8 months and 2 days, 244 days since the attack.

And we must disregard that there were violent protests in 20 countries 'all due to the video'...
 
Jarod said:
I find the IRS shit despicable, however, I am giving the President the benefit of the doubt that he did not know. If he did he should be impeached. But to not reserve judgement until there is some evidence is disingenuous, and speaks of hackery.
Click to expand...

Yeah, because being reminded of something is the same thing as judging somebody. Dink. :rolleyes:
 
Bfgrn said:
Oh, so you know who did it, why they did it and what their motives were? I've been waiting for an answer...it's been 8 months and 2 days, 244 days since the attack.

And we must disregard that there were violent protests in 20 countries 'all due to the video'...
Click to expand...

More nonsense, IMHO almost none of those protests would have taken place without our "Beloved Leader" pointing it out to them while trying to distract from the fact his "Al Qaeda can't stage large scale attacks like this" he promoted during the campaign was utter hogswallow. The "left" seems to think that protests after Obama tells people about the video may actually be due to sudden information given at the moment the President mentioned it.

We sent a man to prison for breaking parole because of the stupidest video ever, and tried to blame that same man for an attack that had nothing at all to do with him. Instead of putting the responsibility directly in the lap of the people who should have it, we instead paid thousands for apology ads on Al Jazeera and it took three weeks to even get these people to simply admit that they knew the attack had nothing to do with the video.
 
Jarod said:
So, lets pretend that all of the above is true... So what? What is to be done about it now? It would not be the first time an administration 1) failed regarding security, 2) spun a story to benefit them, 3)minimized the way a campaign affected an after the fact story... None of that justifies the outrage and anger the R's are currently manufacturing.
Click to expand...

are we on record then that the Obama administration failed regarding security, that they spun a story to benefit them and minimized it for the sake of the campaign....because they Whitehouse hasn't been that forthcoming on those issues......
 
"Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi. " President Barak Obama
 
Damocles said:
The problem isn't the attack so much as the "It's all due to the video!" nonsense that followed, a compliant media supported one of the stupidest explanations ever given feeding the low information voter some of the most obvious disingenuous nonsense I've encountered since Nixon.

Now we find out the IRS is doing the same crap it was doing for Nixon for this guy too... His latest "I didn't know" crap even reminded me of Nixon's "I am not a crook" speech.
Click to expand...

I won't touch the first bit of dumbassery, but unless you have anything at all to suggest that the White House Cousel supplied a list of supporters and staffers ot Mitt Romney to the IRS commissioner (who, by the way, was a Bush appointee) that last bit of nonsense is just slightly overstated.
 
Jarod said:
If the name Clinton were not tangentially related to this, and if it did not happen just prior to an election, you would not hear a peep from the Republicans about this.
Click to expand...

I disagree.....the name Obama is still related.....that is sufficient......
 
Dungheap said:
Actually, no they didn't. They didn't name Ansar Al Islam or Al Qaeda by name and instead referred generically to "extremists."
Click to expand...

oh get serious....they denied there were terrorists involved.....they pretended it was justified outrage over a movie.....the fucking idiots apologized for goodness sake.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top