BenghaziGate Hearings on, Usual Liberal House Stooge BS

gop-benghazi-rohrshack.jpg
 
I am always looking at the next election. The next election always has the potential to be very good for my side, or very bad. Personally, I like the fact that whatever these hearings bring to light will be ancient history to the ADHD American electorate by 2016. Hillary will, most likely, be able to sweep this silliness aside and cruise to the nomination and general election win which will give us at least a dozen years holding the white house, and probably sixteen which will create a liberal progressive SCOTUS well until the middle of this century, which is the most important,long lasting contribution two consecutive two term democrats can make, imho.
 
maineman said:
I am always looking at the next election. The next election always has the potential to be very good for my side, or very bad. Personally, I like the fact that whatever these hearings bring to light will be ancient history to the ADHD American electorate by 2016. Hillary will, most likely, be able to sweep this silliness aside and cruise to the nomination and general election win which will give us at least a dozen years holding the white house, and probably sixteen which will create a liberal progressive SCOTUS well until the middle of this century, which is the most important,long lasting contribution two consecutive two term democrats can make, imho.
Click to expand...

Silliness?
Inaction in the face of enemy threat.
Refusal to protect Americans in harms way.
Denial of increased security.
AMERICANS KILLED which was preventable.
Blaming the CIA.
Lying about the intelligence.
Scrubbing reports.

"What does it matter"?
"Death is a part of life"!

Criminal negligence at the very least.
Hilary is more likely to be in prison in 2016 than in the Oval Office.
She is a liar, a criminal, a perjurer and a traitor.

A few Americans dead because Hilary didnt care and Obama was busy playing golf.

Silliness?
 
I think anyone who can type a sentence that says that Hillary is more likely to be in prison than in the white house in 2016 and do it without bursting out in chuckles is a master of deadpan humor... If the person was SERIOUS when they typed it...THAT'S silly.
 
SJJRSJJS said:
Right now, Liberal shill Congressman Commings is saying that our top Generals have said that rescue planes could not have gotten their in time to save the two Navy Seals. Well, the problem with that is why were they not sent at the beginning whether they arrived in time or not. This Commings is an Obama stooge if he cannot see that sure after the two Seals were killed that maybe planes would not have arrived in time, but no one knew, at the time of the first Stevens attack, that the two Seals would be killed 6 hours after Ambassador Stevens and his aid were killed. After Ambassador Stevens told them that he was under attack, help should have been sent immediately, whether it arrived in time or not. From what I gather The Hillary ignored Steven's request for help. The "buck" stops on The Hillary's desk, she needs to be held accountable in the 2016 Presidential race.
Click to expand...


Conspiracy Theories are all trash but they all have substance.

One says that Benghazi was a gun running station for the CIA. Multiple others show the "rebels" in Libya and Syria with brand new and very expensive guns. Dig deeper and you will see that Corporate America is behind Iraq and is currently rebuilding it (Halliburton is one of the Federal Reserve Chairmen and is currently rebuilding Iraq........because now we rebuild countries we are mad enough to engage in war with? Or maybe since we owe so much money to Corporate America they have influence on Congress)

All the middle east wars are because they decided to trade oil for gold instead of the American dollar. It's the CIA's job to make sure this doesn't happen. Iraq has WMD's, Libya has a dictator that is killing it's people (find proof), Syria has a dictator that is killing it's people (find absolute proof), Iran has a nuke and/or an agenda to make one (find proof)............ALL of these countries said they are going to stop trading gas for US Money as a primary trading currency and have said they are going to trade for GOLD.

So now Syria has chemical weapons. The Right attacks that we need to world police yet Obama stated, "We don't know who used them"


Most of those Countries decided to trade oil for gold instead of our dollar. He was considered "crazy" after this message.

Dig deeper and you will find the exact details of the CIA using "diplomacy" to overthrow Countries. Yet when deals aren't made by the "Brains" agents in the CIA, America finds reason for war. But I'm sure none of you have noticed any wars lately based on practically nothing and were actually Constitutionally declared "WAR".

If you read this far, you learned a lot. If you didn't, you didn't. Gratz to everyone who actually wants to learn politics and not just repeat what their party tells them to repeat on FB or on Forums.
 
maineman said:
I am always looking at the next election. The next election always has the potential to be very good for my side, or very bad. Personally, I like the fact that whatever these hearings bring to light will be ancient history to the ADHD American electorate by 2016. Hillary will, most likely, be able to sweep this silliness aside and cruise to the nomination and general election win which will give us at least a dozen years holding the white house, and probably sixteen which will create a liberal progressive SCOTUS well until the middle of this century, which is the most important,long lasting contribution two consecutive two term democrats can make, imho.
Click to expand...

Funny how this is "ancient history" to you but Iraq was like yesterday.

This is where you go "but, but, but, Bush"
 
Well... the first thing is that there is absolutely NO valid comparison between the events of one night in Benghazi to the war in Iraq. Secondly... I make no excuses about being a democrat. For a whole host of reasons, SCOTUS make up being primary, as I said, I believe it is important from my perspective to elect democrats. You think differently. For strongly partisan democrats like myself, the war in Iraq was a horrible mistake that was made by republicans. For strongly partisan republicans, like you, I presume, Benghazi was a horrible mistake made by democrats. I do not believe that the majority of Americans who find themselves in the middle of the bell curve between those two positions will think about Benghazi all that much in 2016. You might, but as we know, the highly partisan bases on either side of the political spectrum don't win elections for anybody... the middle does. Benghazigate may very well serve as a rallying cry for teabaggers in 2016, but few others will remember, or care, about it.
 
maineman said:
Well... the first thing is that there is absolutely NO valid comparison between the events of one night in Benghazi to the war in Iraq. Secondly... I make no excuses about being a democrat. For a whole host of reasons, SCOTUS make up being primary, as I said, I believe it is important from my perspective to elect democrats. You think differently. For strongly partisan democrats like myself, the war in Iraq was a horrible mistake that was made by republicans. For strongly partisan republicans, like you, I presume, Benghazi was a horrible mistake made by democrats. I do not believe that the majority of Americans who find themselves in the middle of the bell curve between those two positions will think about Benghazi all that much in 2016. You might, but as we know, the highly partisan bases on either side of the political spectrum don't win elections for anybody... the middle does. Benghazigate may very well serve as a rallying cry for teabaggers in 2016, but few others will remember, or care, about it.
Click to expand...

My interest in Benghazi is the coverup of what really happened and the negligence. My larger concern is that the media has given up all pretense of objectivity and have now taken to defending at all costs this waste of a president.

If people knew the truth they would care. You don't because it makes Obama look bad.
 
Rana said:
I heard everyone was falling asleep during today's hearings.
Click to expand...

They were. I was watching it. Some idiot was droning on and on, repeating the same silly unfounded conspiracy theory. I actually saw someone from his side of the aisle point at him and laugh.

It's sad and pitiful the Republicans are so scared of a woman they decided to wait until she was gone to hold more "hearings". I'd love to see her walk in there and give them a dirty look and see them scatter like kids caught misbehaving.
 
I Love America said:
My interest in Benghazi is the coverup of what really happened and the negligence. My larger concern is that the media has given up all pretense of objectivity and have now taken to defending at all costs this waste of a president.

If people knew the truth they would care. You don't because it makes Obama look bad.
Click to expand...

and again... it is the magnitude of the "WHAT" in what makes Obama look bad that doesn't stand up to how Iraq made Bush look bad. Understand? One night in Benghazi. Four Americans dead... versus... a decade in Iraq, 50 thousand dead and wounded Americans, hundreds of thousands of dead and wounded Iraqis, and trillions of dollars flushed down the shitter. The American people see the hypocrisy of the right making a big deal about one and forgetting about the other.
 
and hell, it's not just that the right conveniently FORGETS about Iraq, they wave the bloody flag about Iraq. They remain PROUD of Iraq. They STILL try to convince the world that invading Iraq was the smartest foreign policy decision that the USA has ever made.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top