Will lefties complain?

What are you talking about, dopey?

I've never begrudged anyone their wealth. I don't see how a "lefty" is a hypocrite by amassing wealth. If someone is a communist perhaps, and I'm sure that's how you see most lefties, but that's only because you're a koolaid-immersed hack who has no individual thought process.

The US Communists vote for you lefties....they tell their followers to vote for Democrats on their websites......they must know something that you
obviously deny....they love you guys.

Google it...its there for you to research....stop lying to yourself, the truth will set your free...
 
Are you trying to out-stupid yourself now?

I don't even think you're aware of how pathetic your hackery is. You are literally made of koolaid.

If you can't refute the facts in the post, why respond at all.....you've got to be an moron to respond like you do and then have the audacity to call others stupid...
 
The US Communists vote for you lefties....they tell their followers to vote for Democrats on their websites......they must know something that you
obviously deny....they love you guys.

Google it...its there for you to research....stop lying to yourself, the truth will set your free...

More idiocy; god, you're stupid.

Communism is a different philosophy. If they vote for Democrats, so what? Are Republicans "about" every person who votes their way? Because, as you know, there are plenty of unsavory groups that do.
 
If you can't refute the facts in the post, why respond at all.....you've got to be an moron to respond like you do and then have the audacity to call others stupid...

"Refute the facts" - LOL! What points have you made? Your quiver is empty. Your only argument to support the odd contention that the left is "anti-wealth" was the reaction to Haliburton, which was based on a completely different objection, as anyone familiar with history knows.
 
the simple acquisition of wealth does not imply or indicate greed. The means by which the wealth is acquired might lead to those sorts of assumptions. I see nothing inherently "greedy" in Gore's means of income generation.


The voice hasn't changed, just the tune you sing.....don't forget mate, I've read your posts for years and years....
 
More idiocy; god, you're stupid.

Communism is a different philosophy. If they vote for Democrats, so what? Are Republicans "about" every person who votes their way? Because, as you know, there are plenty of unsavory groups that do.


Doesn't change the facts lad.....the US communists just love Democrats and lefties like you.....they identify with you....you all work for the same goals.....
thats just the undeniable truth of the matter......look it up....read what THEY support and then compare it to the liberal Democrats.....almost identical....

You may not have a membership card, but you're a CPUSA member and supporter in spirit anyway.....no matter how deep your denial goes.....

Are Republicans "about" every person who votes their way?---------------this isn't about individuals...its about one established political organization supporting another
because they have common beliefs and goals and issues.......
 
The US Communists vote for you lefties....they tell their followers to vote for Democrats on their websites......they must know something that you
obviously deny....they love you guys.

Google it...its there for you to research....stop lying to yourself, the truth will set your free...

So what?

I understand the concept of voting for who you want is foreign to you jackbooted Republican thugs who get your marching orders from AM radio, but no one tells the "US Communists" who to vote for.

Now why don't you go cry everyone a river over how irrelevant the Republican party has become.
 
"Refute the facts" - LOL! What points have you made? Your quiver is empty. Your only argument to support the odd contention that the left is "anti-wealth" was the reaction to Haliburton, which was based on a completely different objection, as anyone familiar with history knows.


Did I say the left was anti-wealth ?.....show me where and I'll clarify that post.

Its you whining about Halliburton and nobid contracts, but when I point out facts like below....

NO-BID CONTRACTS
Obama in 2009 told federal agencies that no-bid contracts were “wasteful’’ and “inefficient.’’ Four years later, his administration spent more money on non-competitive contracts than ever before.... So tis really not about no-bid contracts now laddie.

HALLIBURTON and the APPEARANCE of MALFEASANCE
And the " appearance of malfeasance "...why don't you look up Dianne Feinstein and her husbands inept company that finagled a contract in California....a Contract his
company wasn't even qualified to even be considered for the job.


your response is "oh boy, you're stupid"...."you're a hack", etc.....
Thats all ya got because what I say are FACTS.....and you won't dare get all huffy about Obamas lies and flop-flops or Feinstein's malfeasance....
you'd rather whine about Cheney and let your BDS take over.....sometimes you're a total joke
 
Doesn't change the facts lad.....the US communists just love Democrats and lefties like you.....they identify with you....you all work for the same goals.....
thats just the undeniable truth of the matter......look it up....read what THEY support and then compare it to the liberal Democrats.....almost identical....

You may not have a membership card, but you're a CPUSA member and supporter in spirit anyway.....no matter how deep your denial goes.....

.......

Um, actually, no I'm not. This is one of the most ridiculous things I've read on this site.
 
Did I say the left was anti-wealth ?.....show me where and I'll clarify that post.

Its you whining about Halliburton and nobid contracts, but when I point out facts like below....

NO-BID CONTRACTS
Obama in 2009 told federal agencies that no-bid contracts were “wasteful’’ and “inefficient.’’ Four years later, his administration spent more money on non-competitive contracts than ever before.... So tis really not about no-bid contracts now laddie.

HALLIBURTON and the APPEARANCE of MALFEASANCE
And the " appearance of malfeasance "...why don't you look up Dianne Feinstein and her husbands inept company that finagled a contract in California....a Contract his
company wasn't even qualified to even be considered for the job.


your response is "oh boy, you're stupid"...."you're a hack", etc.....
Thats all ya got because what I say are FACTS.....and you won't dare get all huffy about Obamas lies and flop-flops or Feinstein's malfeasance....
you'd rather whine about Cheney and let your BDS take over.....sometimes you're a total joke

You brought up Haliburton, dummy - and you said the left is anti-wealth (and by extension, you accused me of being the same) in your 1st response on this thread. Since YOU brought up Haliburton, I explained the objections lefties had to it, to which you responded by moving the goalposts entirely and posting your idiotic, usual "they do it too!"

Obama's done a ton of things I don't like, and I didn't even vote for him last time. Like I always tell you; I don't carry water for politicians like you do.

Your responses on this thread are completely, 100% pathetic. All they do is scream "hey everyone - look at what an imbecilic hack I am!"
 
The US Communists vote for you lefties....they tell their followers to vote for Democrats on their websites......they must know something that you
obviously deny....they love you guys.

Google it...its there for you to research....stop lying to yourself, the truth will set your free...

They're delusional faux-communists.
 
quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by NOVA

Did I say the left was anti-wealth ?.....show me where and I'll clarify that post.
Yes...yes you did!

quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by NOVA

you bet your ass there are many rich lefties, hypocrites all, as they still whine about CEO's extravagant salarys...
We'll all wait out here til you come up with a convincing lie to CYA!

==============================================================
OK, I give up....where is it....where is "the left is anti-wealth".....is it in code ?

Is the lefts whining about how much CEO's make, say they are anti-wealth ?.....Is English a foreign language for you ?....

It doesn't make them anti-wealth, it make them hypocrites.....need I explain it to you like to a child....?

The lefts loves wealth as much as anyone, they just whine about the wealth of those they perceive to be on the right, like CEO's.....thats hypocrisy...thats being a liberal,
thats being a Democrat, and.....of course, thats YOU.

Stay with it and you'll be reading real books (without pictures) soon....
 
Um, actually, no I'm not. This is one of the most ridiculous things I've read on this site.

You say that every time you can't intelligently argue with what I say.....can't you come up with a different line ?
 
The voice hasn't changed, just the tune you sing.....don't forget mate, I've read your posts for years and years....

the tune hasn't changed a bit. I have always been completely supportive of entrepreneurial innovation and when it led to wealth creation, all the better. I have also always been in favor of higher marginal tax rates on the wealthiest Americans who benefit disproportionately from the great infrastructure and markets that our government tax dollars help create. I have no problem when republicans get rich and I have no problem when democrats get rich. I want them all to pay a bit more to help solve our fiscal dilemma, regardless of their party. When have I EVER said anything differently?
 
OK, I give up....where is it....where is "the left is anti-wealth".....is it in code ?

Is the lefts whining about how much CEO's make, say they are anti-wealth ?.....Is English a foreign language for you ?....

It doesn't make them anti-wealth, it make them hypocrites.....need I explain it to you like to a child....?

The lefts loves wealth as much as anyone, they just whine about the wealth of those they perceive to be on the right, like CEO's.....thats hypocrisy...thats being a liberal,
thats being a Democrat, and.....of course, thats YOU.

Stay with it and you'll be reading real books (without pictures) soon....

Right here...

...there are many rich lefties, hypocrites all, as they still whine about CEO's extravagant salarys...


"rich lefties" whining "about CEO's extravagant salaries..."

I don't doubt you'll claim that's not what you meant, but it's right there and obviously the point you were trying to make.
 
the tune hasn't changed a bit. I have always been completely supportive of entrepreneurial innovation and when it led to wealth creation, all the better. I have also always been in favor of higher marginal tax rates on the wealthiest Americans who benefit disproportionately from the great infrastructure and markets that our government tax dollars help create. I have no problem when republicans get rich and I have no problem when democrats get rich. I want them all to pay a bit more to help solve our fiscal dilemma, regardless of their party. When have I EVER said anything differently?

All water under the bridge....:

I certainly agree with your post for the most part...of course, I don't buy the higher marginal tax rates on anyone, thats just my idea of equal justice and fair play...

50,000 @ a 10% rate is 5000 in taxes.....500000 @ that rate is 50,000 in taxes....thats fair, thats just, thats equal treatment under the law....there is no reason
to confiscate more money from the more successful earner....

And of course, both or these imaginary taxpayers enjoy the very same infrastructure and markets that both their tax dollars help create....as a matter fact....
the more successful taxpayer is contributing quite a bit more to that infrastructure than the lower earner who enjoys with it all with equal zest.
so that dog don't hunt as the saying goes....

No one benefits disproportionately, I believe you benefit according to your talents or luck or how you network and how good your decisions are, what risks you are
willing to take, and of course, how good the economy is,
so that strawman don't cut it either....

your phrase, ' benefit disproportionately' implys something underhanded or illegal...while I'm assuming everything is being done within the law....
To hold that the ditch digger should be treated better that the college dean and in turn the Senator treated better than the average citizen is ludicrous to me....
 
Last edited:
Right here...




"rich lefties" whining "about CEO's extravagant salaries..."

I don't doubt you'll claim that's not what you meant, but it's right there and obviously the point you were trying to make.


Its exactly what I meant.....rich lefties complaining about the wealth of others.....you all do it ALL THE TIME.....class warfare has been your game for decades

and of course, loving money as much as everyone else, thats what defines you as hypocrites.....

Its your lack of reading comprehension, a disability that makes you a little slower that the rest......common among lefties....
mis-quoting, mis-characterizing, mis-interpreting what we post is all to common with pinheads.....

Homy goes so far as to post a link that proves him wrong and he'll smugly brag about it for hours with that "I guess I showed him" attitude....and you're
getting close .....
 
All water under the bridge....:

I certainly agree with you post for the most part...of course, I don't buy the higher marginal tax rates on anyone, thats just my idea of equal justice and fair play...

50,000 @ a 10% rate is 5000 in taxes.....500000 @ that rate is 50,000 in taxes....thats fair, thats just, thats equal treatment under the law....there is no reason
to confiscate more money money from the more successful earner....

And of course, both or these imaginary taxpayers enjoy the very same infrastructure and markets that both their tax dollars help create....as a matter fact....
the more successful taxpayer is contributing quite a bit more to the infrastructure that the lower earner enjoys with equal zest.
so that dog don't hunt as the saying goes....

No one benefits disproportionately, I believe you benefit according to your talents or luck or how you network and how good your decisions are, what risks you are
willing to take, and of course, how good the economy is,
so that strawman don't cut it either....

your phrase, ' benefit disproportionately' implys something underhanded or illegal...while I'm assuming everything it being done within the law....
To hold that the ditch digger should be treated better that the college dean and in turn the Senator treated better than the average citizen is ludicrous to me....

progressive marginal income tax rates have been a part of American income tax policy since its inception. THe fact that you don't like them is not surprising, but irrelevant. That will not change. Only the percentages will. And I responded to your post because you claimed that I had changed my tune. If you can't prove that I have flipped or flopped on an issue, then perhaps you ought not to make those sorts of blanket bullshit statements in the first place. My tune has never changed... you just can't remember one way or the other anymore.... feeble old doofus.
 
Back
Top