Torture, beatings, worsen condition of American pastor held in Iran

Rana said:
Why would she defend it on the subjects that have been discussed on these threads?

Should she support the pedophile priests?

Why does she have to defend her faith on this forum?
Click to expand...

The point is that she goes to much greater lengths to defend the Islamic death cult than her own church (or at least what she claims to be her church). She even defends the pedophile prophet.
 
Thithicus said:
So I'm guessing you must have a wealth of examples of Orthodox Jews mutilating or killing women? Didn't think so. All religions are fucked up, and most religions oppress women to some degree, but Islam takes the cake. Not getting a story told is minor compared to being buried in the sand and having rocks thrown at your head, or having your genitals mutilated, or being killed because you don't believe the words of some camel fucker that lived in 600AD.
Click to expand...

Or being rope danced from a tree because being gay gets the death penalty. Or acid thrown in a woman's face because she rejected a would- be -suitor. Or having fingertips, hands or feet cut off for petty crimes.
OR BEING MURDERED ALONG WITH YOUR ENTIRE FAMILY BECAUSE YOU KNOW THE PROPHET WAS A CHILD MOLESTING FREAK AND YOU ABSOLUTELY REFUSE TO HONOR HIS CULT AND IT'S INSANITY.
 
christiefan915 said:
You're a hater and an extremist no matter how much you try to hide it. You're simply not worth debating on any subject.
Click to expand...

Why, because he spoke the truth about Islam??
Here is some more of that TRUTH you so ignorantly reject. Enjoy.

Or being rope danced from a tree because being gay gets the death penalty. Or acid thrown in a woman's face because she rejected a would- be -suitor. Or having fingertips, hands or feet cut off for petty crimes.
OR BEING MURDERED ALONG WITH YOUR ENTIRE FAMILY BECAUSE YOU KNOW THE PROPHET WAS A CHILD MOLESTING FREAK AND YOU ABSOLUTELY REFUSE TO HONOR HIS CULT AND IT'S INSANITY.
Click to expand...
 
christiefan915 said:
You're a hater and an extremist no matter how much you try to hide it. You're simply not worth debating on any subject.
Click to expand...

Bullshit. I am a moderate; I even lean left on many issues, such as gay rights and the environment. But I also call things as I see them. No, I will not follow your politically correct rules; I have a brain of my own, and it is clear as day to me that Islam is a problem.

Are all Muslims a problem? No, because not all Muslims interpret their scriptures literally. I have no beef with liberal Muslims. I have a big problem with Muslims that interpret their scriptures literally and seek to impose their ways on others, because more often than not, it does not make them a better person; on the contrary, it is likely to lead to violence and disrespect toward the rights of others. This is why I state that "Islam is a problem": generally speaking, the more devout the Muslim, the more violent the Muslim. After all, we don't observe liberal or moderate Muslims committing acts of violence (though moderate Muslims often look the other way, which is another problem).

Unfortunately, fundamentalist Muslims account for a very significant percentage of the Muslim community as a whole...perhaps not in the US, but certainly in their lands of origin. This is a fact that you absolutely refuse to accept.
 
OnearmSword said:
Or being rope danced from a tree because being gay gets the death penalty. Or acid thrown in a woman's face because she rejected a would- be -suitor. Or having fingertips, hands or feet cut off for petty crimes.
OR BEING MURDERED ALONG WITH YOUR ENTIRE FAMILY BECAUSE YOU KNOW THE PROPHET WAS A CHILD MOLESTING FREAK AND YOU ABSOLUTELY REFUSE TO HONOR HIS CULT AND IT'S INSANITY.
Click to expand...

You mean rope-dancing like the KKK did to generations of blacks? [url]http://tinyurl.com/bnlz4jf[/URL]

You mean tying a gay boy to a fence and torturing him? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard

You mean chaining a man to your truck and dragging him to death? http://murderpedia.org/male.K/k/king-john-william.htm

You mean acid-throwing like these women suffered? http://abcnews.go.com/2020/slideshow?id=9477095; http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...in-san-diego-attack-may-have-been-random?lite

You mean having your whole family murdered like this? http://www.post-gazette.com/stories...s-in-westmoreland-triple-murder-trial-684742/

You mean Jerry Sandusky molesting young men for decades while Penn State turned a blind eye to it?

Don't make me laugh.
 
Thithicus said:
Bullshit. I am a moderate; I even lean left on many issues, such as gay rights and the environment. But I also call things as I see them. No, I will not follow your politically correct rules; I have a brain of my own, and it is clear as day to me that Islam is a problem.

Are all Muslims a problem? No, because not all Muslims interpret their scriptures literally. I have no beef with liberal Muslims. I have a big problem with Muslims that interpret their scriptures literally and seek to impose their ways on others, because more often than not, it does not make them a better person; on the contrary, it is likely to lead to violence and disrespect toward the rights of others. This is why I state that "Islam is a problem": generally speaking, the more devout the Muslim, the more violent the Muslim. After all, we don't observe liberal or moderate Muslims committing acts of violence (though moderate Muslims often look the other way, which is another problem).

Unfortunately, fundamentalist Muslims account for a very significant percentage of the Muslim community as a whole...perhaps not in the US, but certainly in their lands of origin. This is a fact that you absolutely refuse to accept.
Click to expand...

"I call it as I see it" usually means "I'm right and you're wrong."

You may be more moderate on social issues but you're a rabid dog when it comes to Muslims and if you had any self-awareness at all, you'd acknowledge that. You say "I have no beef with liberal Muslims" and on another day you say words like "Islam is a sickness that needs to be eradicated from the earth." I can't fathom how you manage to defend your beliefs when you post two diametrically opposed views.

"Islam is a sickness that needs to be eradicated from the earth." That means it's practitioners have to be sick too, right? So how does that compute with "liberal Muslims"? Seems to me if you're trying to wipe out a sickness, you have to wipe out anything and everything that contributes to the sickness. Ex.: if you're trying to wipe out malaria, you go after mosquitos. If Islam = malaria then Muslims = mosquitos. Your position is inconsistent.
 
christiefan915 said:
"I call it as I see it" usually means "I'm right and you're wrong."

You may be more moderate on social issues but you're a rabid dog when it comes to Muslims and if you had any self-awareness at all, you'd acknowledge that. You say "I have no beef with liberal Muslims" and on another day you say words like "Islam is a sickness that needs to be eradicated from the earth." I can't fathom how you manage to defend your beliefs when you post two diametrically opposed views.

"Islam is a sickness that needs to be eradicated from the earth." That means it's practitioners have to be sick too, right? So how does that compute with "liberal Muslims"? Seems to me if you're trying to wipe out a sickness, you have to wipe out anything and everything that contributes to the sickness. Ex.: if you're trying to wipe out malaria, you go after mosquitos. If Islam = malaria then Muslims = mosquitos. Your position is inconsistent.
Click to expand...

This is the way I see Dixie and Vanilla as well, very inconsistent.
 
christiefan915 said:
"I call it as I see it" usually means "I'm right and you're wrong."

You may be more moderate on social issues but you're a rabid dog when it comes to Muslims and if you had any self-awareness at all, you'd acknowledge that. You say "I have no beef with liberal Muslims" and on another day you say words like "Islam is a sickness that needs to be eradicated from the earth." I can't fathom how you manage to defend your beliefs when you post two diametrically opposed views.

"Islam is a sickness that needs to be eradicated from the earth." That means it's practitioners have to be sick too, right? So how does that compute with "liberal Muslims"? Seems to me if you're trying to wipe out a sickness, you have to wipe out anything and everything that contributes to the sickness. Ex.: if you're trying to wipe out malaria, you go after mosquitos. If Islam = malaria then Muslims = mosquitos. Your position is inconsistent.
Click to expand...

No, it is not inconsistent. Islam is a sick religion, and people that practice Islam are sick people. Liberal Muslims do not practice Islam, but rather a loose interpretation of Islam. Whether they are aware of that or not is beside the point. Islam at its core is a disease.
 
...but yes, ideally there would be no Islam at all - or any other religion, for that matter. All religions encourage people to believe something for which there is no evidence. That is a problem.
 
Thithicus said:
No, it is not inconsistent. Islam is a sick religion, and people that practice Islam are sick people. Liberal Muslims do not practice Islam, but rather a loose interpretation of Islam. Whether they are aware of that or not is beside the point. Islam at its core is a disease.
Click to expand...

Yes, and I remember when you were all on fire for Jesus. I am pretty sure in a few more months you will be a convert to Islam.
 
Last edited:
Thithicus said:
No, it is not inconsistent. Islam is a sick religion, and people that practice Islam are sick people. Liberal Muslims do not practice Islam, but rather a loose interpretation of Islam. Whether they are aware of that or not is beside the point. Islam at its core is a disease.
Click to expand...

Q.E.D.
 
christiefan915 said:
You mean rope-dancing like the KKK did to generations of blacks? [url]http://tinyurl.com/bnlz4jf[/URL]

You mean tying a gay boy to a fence and torturing him? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard

You mean chaining a man to your truck and dragging him to death? http://murderpedia.org/male.K/k/king-john-william.htm

You mean acid-throwing like these women suffered? http://abcnews.go.com/2020/slideshow?id=9477095; http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/201...in-san-diego-attack-may-have-been-random?lite

You mean having your whole family murdered like this? http://www.post-gazette.com/stories...s-in-westmoreland-triple-murder-trial-684742/

You mean Jerry Sandusky molesting young men for decades while Penn State turned a blind eye to it?

Don't make me laugh.
Click to expand...

Are you truly that confused? All you listed were indeed crimes but none of those crimes were done in the name of Christianity. So why did you toss them out there? To prove that crime exists?
Good God some of you people are so lame it's funny.
The insanity of your post and the crimes you listed made me laugh because they have no bearing on the topic at hand.
If they do please make the connection. I can wait.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top