SmarterthanYou
rebel
do you need a specific instance shown to you that background checks lead to registration?Then take it up with SP. I've been down that road already, disagreed then and disagree now.
do you need a specific instance shown to you that background checks lead to registration?Then take it up with SP. I've been down that road already, disagreed then and disagree now.
avoidance and obfuscation. a clear signal that you know you've lost the debate.A statement based on emotion.
How about just letting them go home?
Actually, the author of the OP brought registration in to begin with in an apparent effort to mislead. Read the thread title.
No, once again, statement of fact, based on the vast body of evidence that has been created in the 20 or so years of my life.
avoidance and obfuscation. a clear signal that you know you've lost the debate.
Well, I've been around for twice your life and then some, and it's pretty hard to get excited over seeing history repeat itself.
most of the libs here (including you) like to equate polls of 1,000 people as being representative of all of America. Do you not think that I know 1,000 gun owners? I've been a gun rights/open carry advocate for almost 6 years in this state and have met thousands of gun owners, so my opinion has a basis in relative fact.You said "the majority of private sellers actually have a moral compass. 98% of the gun owners I know would never willingly sell one of their guns to someone they suspected would use it to commit crimes."
That is your opinion based on the people you know only. It doesn't cover every gun owner in the country.
The Libs take their polls in antigun cities/States like New York City, and then they try to browbeat US into believing their manipulated polls.most of the libs here (including you) like to equate polls of 1,000 people as being representative of all of America. Do you not think that I know 1,000 gun owners? I've been a gun rights/open carry advocate for almost 6 years in this state and have met thousands of gun owners, so my opinion has a basis in relative fact.
most of the libs here (including you) like to equate polls of 1,000 people as being representative of all of America. Do you not think that I know 1,000 gun owners? I've been a gun rights/open carry advocate for almost 6 years in this state and have met thousands of gun owners, so my opinion has a basis in relative fact.
And let's not forget the massive companies that have left fascist states for greener pastures. PTR, Colt, Beretta, Magpul....the list goes on. Several thousand jobs have left the taker states.
How about just letting them go home?
most of the libs here (including you) like to equate polls of 1,000 people as being representative of all of America. Do you not think that I know 1,000 gun owners? I've been a gun rights/open carry advocate for almost 6 years in this state and have met thousands of gun owners, so my opinion has a basis in relative fact.
do you need a specific instance shown to you that background checks lead to registration?
And let's not forget the massive companies that have left fascist states for greener pastures. PTR, Colt, Beretta, Magpul....the list goes on. Several thousand jobs have left the taker states.
"Taker states, fascist states..." Stop, your emotional verbiage is embarrassing for you.
You seem to confuse what is emotion and what is fact. Those descriptors are accurate measurable and quantifiable, therefore they cannot be emotional except to those who do not wish to attribute such descriptions, because they have an emotional investment in the matter.
If they are innocent, yes, but by this time they probably hate the US for their imprisonment, and may indeed become terrorists. It is a lose, lose situation.
yet with the constant abuse of 'laws' that the government has been caught in, why should we take it at face value that THIS is the one they will suddenly obey?You've already given "a" specific instance. You just haven't shown that "a" specific instance automatically translates to all background checks will lead to registration.