Your children are not yours....says the left.

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar said:
You were the one that started the tough talk. I am just not buying it. There's probably not much distinction between your neck and chin but i am sure youd find some way to lose.
Click to expand...

Yeah probably not much difference between your brain and your ass either I love idiots like you, you make my day better due to laughter keep drinking the kool aid the left is serving.
 
anyone who tries to tell you society has no responsibility to the children that inhabit that society is a socipath.


Humans are human due to our comapssion for each other.


we developed a higher brain due to our emotional interactions with each other.
 
If you saw a four year old running about on the interstate, would you intervene?

If you answered yes, you have admitted to some responsability for others children.....
 
OnearmSword said:
It is with Howey... Obama, Hillary and other ijits..:)
Click to expand...

I believe you have (added) narcissm confused with intellectual and moral superiority.

Granule said:
Nah. We'll stick and you spelledwith the gay marr.iage and adoption/foster care bans, and work from there. First things first, disease bag. ;)
Click to expand...

Anyone who would think a child is better off in a group home with other unwanted children as opposed to being loved by two parents is a idiot.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
If you saw a four year old running about on the interstate, would you intervene?

If you answered yes, you have admitted to some responsability for others children.....
Click to expand...

What if I intervended if a grown man did this? What if I intervened if a woman was planning to jump off a bridge? Your logic is flawed.

This only proves that you are a citizen.
 
Howey said:
Anyone who would think a child is better off in a group home with other unwanted children as opposed to being loved by two parents is a idiot.
Click to expand...
Homos use children as a political tool, disease bag, and you know it. You're incapable of loving children the way true parents can, anyways. Gay marriage is wrong, and gay parenting is even worse.
 
pisskop said:
What if I intervended if a grown man did this? What if I intervened if a woman was planning to jump off a bridge? Your logic is flawed.

This only proves that you are a citizen.
Click to expand...

No, If you help those adults you are also accepting some responsability for your fellow man. I was going to point that out in my post, but I have been trying to learn to keep things as simple here as possable.... otherwise the Cons try to smear the point.
 
Jarod said:
No, If you help those adults you are also accepting some responsability for your fellow man. I was going to point that out in my post, but I have been trying to learn to keep things as simple here as possable.... otherwise the Cons try to smear the point.
Click to expand...

His logic makes me laugh out loud! Seriously what does he think the definition of citizen is?
 
A citizen is a member of the VILLAGE... these people are so blinded by hatred for anything they perceve as left, they are literally to the point of hating "goodwill toward all".
 
Jarod said:
A citizen is a member of the VILLAGE... these people are so blinded by hatred for anything they perceve as left, they are literally to the point of hating "goodwill toward all".
Click to expand...
You're so full of shit, Jarod. "Goodwill toward all" means redistribution for some, and free Obama phones for everyone else. The truth is, it takes us "Cons" to expose your lies.
 
Rana said:
His logic makes me laugh out loud! Seriously what does he think the definition of citizen is?
Click to expand...

Female, you are welcome to actually debate with some of your own material. Otherwise kindly STFU. I was growing to like you when you ignored me.

Jarod said:
No, If you help those adults you are also accepting some responsability for your fellow man. I was going to point that out in my post, but I have been trying to learn to keep things as simple here as possable.... otherwise the Cons try to smear the point.
Click to expand...

No Jarod. Out children our their parents responsibility. You are welcome to go above and beyond, but you are equally welcome to watch some long pork get stretched under a car.


You are presenting a non sequitur.
 
pisskop said:
Female, you are welcome to actually debate with some of your own material. Otherwise kindly STFU. I was growing to like you when you ignored me.



No Jarod. Out children our their parents responsibility. You are welcome to go above and beyond, but you are equally welcome to watch some long pork get stretched under a car.


You are presenting a non sequitur.
Click to expand...

Watching "some long pork get stretched under a car" as you so beautifully put it, when you could easily do something about it, would be not living up to your responsability as a member of society. Just my opinion.

If you conservatives want to argue otherwise, go for it.
 
Jarod said:
Watching "some long pork get stretched under a car" as you so beautifully put it, when you could easily do something about it, would be not living up to your responsability as a member of society. Just my opinion.

If you conservatives want to argue otherwise, go for it.
Click to expand...

Oh no. you argued that it was specifically a responibility to children. You presented a non sequitur, and its not on me or anyone on the right to say otherwise.
 
pisskop said:
Oh no. you argued that it was specifically a responibility to children. You presented a non sequitur, and its not on me or anyone on the right to say otherwise.
Click to expand...

You do have a moral duty to help a child you see in mortal danger, if you can easily do so. Do you argue differently.....
 
No, we have a responsibility to ensure a safe enviornment. We don't have a legal responsibility to do any more.

Morally, society expects us to help, but even then it does not often condem inaction.

You do may have a moral duty to help a child person you see in mortal danger, if you can easily do so. Do you argue differently.....
Click to expand...
Not any more.
 
Jarod said:
You do have a moral duty to help a child you see in mortal danger, if you can easily do so. Do you argue differently.....
Click to expand...

pisskop said:
No, we have a responsibility to ensure a safe enviornment. We don't have a legal responsibility to do any more.

Morally, society expects us to help, but even then it does not often condem inaction.


Not any more.
Click to expand...

Since you've still failed to learn to use the quote function, I'll assume you're replying to Jarod.

Please note he said "moral", not "legal".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top