Many American White Men Worship Guns Because of Sexual Insecurity, Entitlement, and P

Grind is Dead said:
I mean I can only say what I believe so many times. Either that or it's the longest running joke in JPP history. I have been absurdly consistent on this. I don't know why you have a hard time accepting it. Gun rights are about important as air. They are everything. More kids die in pools every year and we dont have a pool epidemic. There will always be some amount of death for anything that exists. The amount of people that die from guns each year is irrelevant in comparison to how important gun rights are.
Click to expand...


Just so you know...the fact you claim to place more value on an inanimate object over that of the life of a human being speaks VOLUMES about who you are as a person.
 
quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by christiefan915

If you're going to be pedantic, where does it say "the right to keep 30-round magazines, etc."?
Click to expand...

Now that you ask,

Where does the Constitution say same sex couple marriages have to be recognized by the government ?
Where does the Constitution say women can kill their unborn children ?
Where does the Constitution say taxpayers should pay for a womens contraceptives ?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Just so you know...the fact you claim to place more value on an inanimate object over that of the life of a human being speaks VOLUMES about who you are as a person.
Click to expand...

According to grind we're retarded mouth-breathers when we voice an opinion. Yet he just wrote "Why is this so hard for you to understand? People can have different opinions zappas..."

The little twerp needs to explain himself.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Just so you know...the fact you claim to place more value on an inanimate object over that of the life of a human being speaks VOLUMES about who you are as a person.
Click to expand...
just so you know, the fact that you refuse to understand the necessity that guns have in our world speaks VOLUMES about your idiocy.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Just so you know...the fact you claim to place more value on an inanimate object over that of the life of a human being speaks VOLUMES about who you are as a person.
Click to expand...

it's not about the object zappas. It's what the object enables. Which is a free society and a protection against tyranny.
 
christiefan915 said:
Geez, not only new but self-congratulatory. Get over yourself.
Click to expand...
What man posts comments that he does not believe to be accurate true and best? Should that man be in error and find himself to be so he can correct his actions and beliefs.
It called learning and more people not only here but out in the real world should give it a real go.
 
:fogey:
NOVA said:
Now that you ask,

Where does the Constitution say same sex couple marriages have to be recognized by the government ?
Where does the Constitution say women can kill their unborn children ?
Where does the Constitution say taxpayers should pay for a womens contraceptives ?
Click to expand...

Birth control and sluts! :fogey:
 
NOVA said:
Now that you ask,

Where does the Constitution say same sex couple marriages have to be recognized by the government ?
Where does the Constitution say women can kill their unborn children ?
Where does the Constitution say taxpayers should pay for a womens contraceptives ?
Click to expand...

Another woman-bashing post, why am I not surprised?
 
Darla said:
Grind why do you have to be so mean to Christie? I really don't get it. Her and I agree on almost everything, you love me and hate her? And Billy seems to really like her, and hates me. That's weird. Just remember Grind, sisters before misters!
Click to expand...

I could write a long list of reasons why I think i don't get along with christie, many of which I have specifically mentioned already. But yes, it has very little to do with politics. It's a personality thing and a few other things.
 
christiefan915 said:
No more so than any presidents in the past. And I believe corrections can be made without violence.
Click to expand...
CAN, but that is not a definite, is it? The thing you should be considering is where is the line drawn when it CANNOT be corrected without violence and will it have been too late if you prohibit weapons of war to the public?
 
christiefan915 said:
According to grind we're retarded mouth-breathers when we voice an opinion. Yet he just wrote "Why is this so hard for you to understand? People can have different opinions zappas..."

The little twerp needs to explain himself.
Click to expand...


"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"......

Its not ambiguous.....there can be no differing opinions on the words......its meant the same thing for over 200 years.
 
Grind is Dead said:
it's not about the object zappas. It's what the object enables. Which is a free society and a protection against tyranny.
Click to expand...


Right.

Because if guns didn't exist, then we'd all be living under the tyrannical rule of some despot.

Justify it anyway you have to, to help you sleep at night.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Right.

Because if guns didn't exist, then we'd all be living under the tyrannical rule of some despot.

Justify it anyway you have to, to help you sleep at night.
Click to expand...

we might not be, but guns are the last defense. That's the point. No one is saying without guns, there will automatically be tyranny. What we are saying is that without guns, we have no recourse should tyranny ever arise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top