Pelosi: No Spending Problem; Obama: Yes Spending Problem

ROFLMAO... because outspending revenue is not a problem. Deficits are a big big sign of a spending problem. But lets play your game...

Spending as a percentage of GDP:
2009: 25.2
2010: 24.1
2011: 24.1
2012: 24.3

Max year under Reagan:
23.5% again in 1983

(1) Spending is only one side of the deficit equation. Perhaps we have a revenue problem.

(2) At best you've proven that we had a spending problem, not that we have a spending problem.

(3) We're projected to spend less during Obama's second term than what we spent under Reagan during his second term as a percentage of GDP. Funny I don't ever hear you bitch about the spending problem we had back then. And the economy is substantially worse now than it was then.
 
(1) Spending is only one side of the deficit equation. Perhaps we have a revenue problem.

(2) At best you've proven that we had a spending problem, not that we have a spending problem.

(3) We're projected to spend less during Obama's second term than what we spent under Reagan during his second term as a percentage of GDP. Funny I don't ever hear you bitch about the spending problem we had back then. And the economy is substantially worse now than it was then.

hilarious...so if we have a revenue problem, yet, continue to spend as if there were no revenue problem, that doesn't mean we have a spending problem

LMAO

once again

LMAO

how dung's household works:

dear, i lost my job, but we can keep spending as if i had my job because we only have a revenue problem
 
hilarious...so if we have a revenue problem, yet, continue to spend as if there were no revenue problem, that doesn't mean we have a spending problem

LMAO

once again

LMAO

how dung's household works:

dear, i lost my job, but we can keep spending as if i had my job because we only have a revenue problem


I don't think spending is a problem or that revenue is a problem, I'm just pointing out that looking at deficits doesn't tell you if you have a problem and, if you do have a problem, whether the problem is spending or revenue.

Did we have a spending problem in 1943? I mean, we had a deficit of 30% of GDP! Was it a spending problem? A revenue problem? No problem?
 
(1) Spending is only one side of the deficit equation. Perhaps we have a revenue problem.

You just said spending wasnt the problem and not to focus on the deficits. Now that you see spending has been insane, you want to change topic yet again?

(2) At best you've proven that we had a spending problem, not that we have a spending problem.

LOL... the projections are that we will continue to have above average spending as a percentage of GDP. Given the apoplectic responses of Dems every time spending cuts are mentioned, I wouldn't count on better spending habits any time soon.

(3) We're projected to spend less during Obama's second term than what we spent under Reagan during his second term as a percentage of GDP. Funny I don't ever hear you bitch about the spending problem we had back then. And the economy is substantially worse now than it was then.

LMAO...

1) You are wrong, we are currently projected to spend more during Obamas second term
2) I have complained about the deficit spending of each President since Ike. So as usual, you are full of shit.
 
I don't think spending is a problem or that revenue is a problem, I'm just pointing out that looking at deficits doesn't tell you if you have a problem and, if you do have a problem, whether the problem is spending or revenue.

Did we have a spending problem in 1943? I mean, we had a deficit of 30% of GDP! Was it a spending problem? A revenue problem? No problem?

fair enough, you did say "perhaps" we have a revenue problem.

the spending problem we have now if obvious. as to 1943, not comparable to now.
 
You just said spending wasnt the problem and not to focus on the deficits. Now that you see spending has been insane, you want to change topic yet again?

I don't think spending has been insane. My point was simply that looking solely at deficits, as you did, will not tell you whether we have a spending problem.


LOL... the projections are that we will continue to have above average spending as a percentage of GDP. Given the apoplectic responses of Dems every time spending cuts are mentioned, I wouldn't count on better spending habits any time soon.

Then cite the projections to show we currently have a spending problem. Citing past spending doesn't tell us squat about today.


LMAO...

1) You are wrong, we are currently projected to spend more during Obamas second term
2) I have complained about the deficit spending of each President since Ike. So as usual, you are full of shit.

(1) Show me.

(2) LOL. I know your whole song and dance, SF. Spare me.
 
fair enough, you did say "perhaps" we have a revenue problem.

the spending problem we have now if obvious. as to 1943, not comparable to now.

The spending problem isn't obvious to me. And if deficits, even huge ones, are OK sometimes (like in 1943), then you're going to do more than just point to a deficit to say that we have a problem.
 
I don't think spending has been insane. My point was simply that looking solely at deficits, as you did, will not tell you whether we have a spending problem.

Except it is not what I did. It was not until I showed you the insane SPENDING numbers that you decided you wanted to divert yet again.


Then cite the projections to show we currently have a spending problem. Citing past spending doesn't tell us squat about today.

[TABLE="width: 410"]
[TR]
[TD]2013 estimate[/TD]
[TD]16,335.0[/TD]
[TD]17.8[/TD]
[TD]23.3[/TD]
[TD]-5.5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2014 estimate[/TD]
[TD]17,155.6[/TD]
[TD]18.7[/TD]
[TD]22.6[/TD]
[TD]-3.9[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2015 estimate[/TD]
[TD]18,177.8[/TD]
[TD]19.0[/TD]
[TD]22.3[/TD]
[TD]-3.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2016 estimate[/TD]
[TD]19,261.1[/TD]
[TD]19.1[/TD]
[TD]22.5[/TD]
[TD]-3.4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]2017 estimate[/TD]
[TD]20,368.6[/TD]
[TD]19.2[/TD]
[TD]22.2[/TD]
[TD]-3.0[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]





(2) LOL. I know your whole song and dance, SF. Spare me.

So you then admit that I have complained about spending since Ike. Good, glad to see you admit you lied to begin with.
 
Jesus Christ, SF. I already expalined to you why that information is inaccurate. You're completely impervious to reason. GO check out the CBO report from Feb. 5. It has updated projections and I know that you have the historical budget data at your fingertips. You're wrong. Reagan's spending exceeds Obama's projected spending by about 1.4% of GDP.
 
Jesus Christ, SF. I already expalined to you why that information is inaccurate. You're completely impervious to reason. GO check out the CBO report from Feb. 5. It has updated projections and I know that you have the historical budget data at your fingertips. You're wrong. Reagan's spending exceeds Obama's projected spending by about 1.4% of GDP.

How about YOU link us up to the data you are using?
 
Acrobat shit the bed so I can't, but it's right in the CBO report you made a thread about the other day. The projected deficits are easy enough to find as are the historical deficits from the OMB that you've linked to already.


Edit: Here's the link to the pdf: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/43907-BudgetOutlook.pdf

You realize that the CBO currently projects another ten years of deficits totalling $7 Trillion? about $700B per year?
 
Back
Top