Absolutely un-***** believable!

Science is theory and belief.
It's no biggie, no one wants to ban it!!

Remember live and let live?

Can science explain why different people have different interests?

Can science explain love?

Science is great, but not every scientific belief is fact.

There is a scientific theory that claims to proove that the world was created in 6 days!

Is that also a fact?
 
Science is theory and belief.
It's no biggie, no one wants to ban it!!

Remember live and let live?

Can science explain why different people have different interests?

Can science explain love?

Science is great, but not every scientific belief is fact.

There is a scientific theory that claims to proove that the world was created in 6 days!

Is that also a fact?
Well those are interesting questions but they are also questions that are outside the scope of science. Some of your statements are just unbelievably scientifically illiterate. ALL scientific beliefs must have a factual basis or by definition they wouldn't be a scientific belief. I mean give me a break....where the did folks like you and PiMP and Nova study science? Or did you? Did you ever study science beyond the elementary school level?
 
Well those are interesting questions but they are also questions that are outside the scope of science. Some of your statements are just unbelievably scientifically illiterate. ALL scientific beliefs must have a factual basis or by definition they wouldn't be a scientific belief. I mean give me a break....where the did folks like you and PiMP and Nova study science? Or did you? Did you ever study science beyond the elementary school level?
I studied humanities. At degree level.

So science can only prove some things and offer theories on some things but cannot explain or prove all things?

All your abuse and insults and menacing posts then out of nowhere you suddenly agree with my point?
 
I know...round and round and round he goes.....where PiMP stops...nobody knows! LOL

What was that song be Little Richard? Spn-a-spin or something? I know it was fantastic but I'll be buggared if I can remember its title. Perhaps PIMP can help!
 
I studied humanities. At degree level.

So science can only prove some things and offer theories on some things but cannot explain or prove all things?

All your abuse and insults and menacing posts then out of nowhere you suddenly agree with my point?
Menacing? How does my pointing out that you are ignorant of science equate with menacing? I'm just pointing out facts pal. You may have studied Humanities at degree level but I've studied Biology at the graduate level. I'm merely pointing out that your own words prove that you don't understand science, the scientific method nor do you comprehend what a scientific theory is yet you somehow feel privelaged to tell those of us who are better educated in science than you are how to teach our field? That just silly. A degree in humanities is all well and fine and needed but it isn't a degree in science and it certainly doesn't make you qualified to expound upon science education.
 
I've been looking for where you support YOUR theories with evidence. Help me cos I can only find attacks on logic.

at least you are beginning to realize your logic is under attack......this may be a breakthrough for you.......now if I can just get you to realize that your own position also is not supported by evidence you will perhaps come to grips that my position is just as valid as yours.......
 
Good lord not only don't you know what a scientific theory is you don't even know what a law of nature is.

listen, dumbfuck......I have been ridiculing people on the left who don't know the difference between laws, theories, and total conjecture.....for some reason you want to construe my criticism of those who don't know the difference into being my own lack of knowledge.......the fact is, I know more about science and its philosophical underpinnings than you do, always have and always will.....

so how about you stop pretending you are too intelligent to engage in a discussion of this matter with the likes of me and actually sit down and defend your idiotic beliefs......
 
Sure you did PiMP, sure you did. Hell it's perfectly clear to anyone who actually has studied science and didn't attend your alma mater The Nashville School of Faith Healing and Proctology, that you don't have the first foggiest clue what a scientific theory is. You consistantly time and time and time again use "law", "theory", and "hypothesis" out if their proper scientific context. It's freaken hillarious! :)

what's freakin' hilarious (besides the multiple spelling errors in your diatribe about intellectual superiority) is the fact you continue to claim intellectual superiority despite never actually demonstrating any of it......

as for using "theory" out of context, do you deny that science requires a "theory" to be something that must be capable of experimentation?.....do you deny that there are people on this board that believe both abiogenesis and macro-evolution to be theories?..........do you admit that neither can ever qualify as theories?.......
 
Science is great, but not every scientific belief is fact.

There is a scientific theory that claims to proove that the world was created in 6 days!

Is that also a fact?

No, there is no scientific theory that claims to prove the world was created in 6 days. There may be pseudo-science masquerading as a scientific theory, but that is not the same as actual scientific theories.
 
at least you are beginning to realize your logic is under attack......this may be a breakthrough for you.......now if I can just get you to realize that your own position also is not supported by evidence you will perhaps come to grips that my position is just as valid as yours.......

Waiting for you to give evidence to support your fantasies. Try not to spin again, you'll be getting dizzy.
 
listen, dumbfuck......I have been ridiculing people on the left who don't know the difference between laws, theories, and total conjecture.....for some reason you want to construe my criticism of those who don't know the difference into being my own lack of knowledge.......the fact is, I know more about science and its philosophical underpinnings than you do, always have and always will.....

so how about you stop pretending you are too intelligent to engage in a discussion of this matter with the likes of me and actually sit down and defend your idiotic beliefs......
Well PiMP.....before you criticise someone for not knowing what a scientific theory, law or hypothesis is maybe you should learn what they are yourself? It's apparent to everyone on the board who's studied science beyond the 9th grade level that you don't have that first clue what you're talking about. In fact you're giving me some excellent laughes. :)
 
Last edited:
what's freakin' hilarious (besides the multiple spelling errors in your diatribe about intellectual superiority) is the fact you continue to claim intellectual superiority despite never actually demonstrating any of it......

as for using "theory" out of context, do you deny that science requires a "theory" to be something that must be capable of experimentation?.....do you deny that there are people on this board that believe both abiogenesis and macro-evolution to be theories?..........do you admit that neither can ever qualify as theories?.......
That's a hypothesis PiMP...good freaking lord....where the hell did you study science! LOL
 
/boggle.....the origin of life is not foundational to biology?.......and you wonder why I believe you're nothing more than a lab rat.....
No....not really....for obvious reasons.....and if you knew anything about biology you'd know why....it's just something rightwing nutjobs with a religious agenda seem to be obsessed with. As for being a lab tech....that would still make me better educated than a lawyer. :)
 
Well PiMP.....before you criticise someone for not knowing what a scientific theory, law or hypothesis is maybe you should learn what they are yourself? It's apparent to everyone on the board who's studied science beyond the 9th grade level that you don't have that first clue what you're talking about. In fact you're giving me some excellent laughes. :)

really?.....quote me in a sentence that gave you that clue.....
 
Back
Top