Pro-Life???

[Cancel 2016.2]

Unsurprising - a couple of cop-out answers from the righties.

Let's get some better conservatives for the board, shall we?

LMAO... unsurprising, a pathetic display yet again from Lorax.

If you can't grasp that there is a difference between taking an innocent life vs. the life of person convicted of a horrid crime, then that is on you.

You simply want to play word games.

If I said, how can a person be pro-abortion and also anti-war? Taking a life is taking a life. A person must be a bit off to be pissed at innocent lives being taken in a war and then be non-nonchalant about the lives of the unborn being taken at will.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

For the record, I'm not against the death penalty. But nor do I classify myself as "pro life". I think anyone who does classify themselves as pro-life, yet supports death, has some explaining to do.

As for WWII, we were attacked, and we do have an obligation to our allies as well.

And yet when it is explained that your pathetic attempts at word play is the problem, you continue chirping away that we have 'explaining to do'. We have explained it to you. The fact that you either refuse to acknowledge the explanation or are too ignorant to understand the distinction is on you.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

LMAO... unsurprising, a pathetic display yet again from Lorax.

If you can't grasp that there is a difference between taking an innocent life vs. the life of person convicted of a horrid crime, then that is on you.

You simply want to play word games.

If I said, how can a person be pro-abortion and also anti-war? Taking a life is taking a life. A person must be a bit off to be pissed at innocent lives being taken in a war and then be non-nonchalant about the lives of the unborn being taken at will.

Another winner comparison from SF.

That's a ridiculous strawman - obviously, people who are pro choice do not see a fetus the same way you do. But there is no ambiguity about the innocent death that occurs in war.

Wanna try again?

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Another winner comparison from SF.

That's a ridiculous strawman - obviously, people who are pro choice do not see a fetus the same way you do. But there is no ambiguity about the innocent death that occurs in war.

Wanna try again?

And pro life people do not see it the way you do... that is the point moron... you are pretending that being pro-life in the abortion debate means that pro-life people are pro-life in any and all situations. That is not the case for everyone in the pro-life movement. Some perhaps, but many do distinguish in protecting INNOCENT lives. A concept you can't grasp. Yet you continue to push YOUR position that being pro-life with regards to abortion means they must also protect the life of a murderer or rapist who gets the death penalty.

My example was the exact same in reverse. The difference is that science is on my side in stating that it is a life. The very fact that you have to perform an abortion tells you it is alive. If it was dead, you would not have to kill it. Dumbass.

as for war... try reading what has already been written. I am not going to retype the same thing over and over again for your stupid word play.

As for your comments on WWII... your assertion is that if our allies begin bombing campaigns that kill innocent people, then we must support them in their endeavors?

If you find it unjust to bomb if innocents are killed as a result, then the reason for doing so does not matter. You can't do it at all. Is that not the same logic you are trying so very hard to apply to the pro-life vs. death penalty positions?

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

And pro life people do not see it the way you do... that is the point moron... you are pretending that being pro-life in the abortion debate means that pro-life people are pro-life in any and all situations. That is not the case for everyone in the pro-life movement. Some perhaps, but many do distinguish in protecting INNOCENT lives. A concept you can't grasp. Yet you continue to push YOUR position that being pro-life with regards to abortion means they must also protect the life of a murderer or rapist who gets the death penalty.

My example was the exact same in reverse. The difference is that science is on my side in stating that it is a life. The very fact that you have to perform an abortion tells you it is alive. If it was dead, you would not have to kill it. Dumbass.

as for war... try reading what has already been written. I am not going to retype the same thing over and over again for your stupid word play.

As for your comments on WWII... your assertion is that if our allies begin bombing campaigns that kill innocent people, then we must support them in their endeavors?

If you find it unjust to bomb if innocents are killed as a result, then the reason for doing so does not matter. You can't do it at all. Is that not the same logic you are trying so very hard to apply to the pro-life vs. death penalty positions?

Pro life people don't see innocents being killed in war as innocents being killed in war?

You're really dumbed down. The reverse YOU are presenting doesn't work, because everyone understands that innocents killed in war are innocents killed in war. Your emo belief of children being killed by abortion is not shared by everyone, or even most people, or even the Supreme Court.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

And on WWII, our obligation to our allies ends beyond situations where they are attacked or in danger. Do I have to spell out everything to you?

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

Being anti-choice is not about "life", as witnessed by their general depraved indifference to actual real live living beings. It's about controlling women's bodies and sexual freedom.

You can twist and you can dance but you know where the last two drops end up!

That's right, in your pants!

In other words, doesn't matter. Anyone who follows the anti-choice movement knows this. They are pretty explicitly clear about it.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

Pro life people don't see innocents being killed in war as innocents being killed in war?

You're really dumbed down. The reverse YOU are presenting doesn't work, because everyone understands that innocents killed in war are innocents killed in war. Your emo belief of children being killed by abortion is not shared by everyone, or even most people, or even the Supreme Court.

No but he will keep pretending it does.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

For the record, I'm not against the death penalty. But nor do I classify myself as "pro life". I think anyone who does classify themselves as pro-life, yet supports death, has some explaining to do.

As for WWII, we were attacked, and we do have an obligation to our allies as well.

Do you think those who are pro abortion yet anti death penalty have some explaining to do? If not, why not?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Pro life people don't see innocents being killed in war as innocents being killed in war?

You're really dumbed down. The reverse YOU are presenting doesn't work, because everyone understands that innocents killed in war are innocents killed in war. Your emo belief of children being killed by abortion is not shared by everyone, or even most people, or even the Supreme Court.

The bottom line is that you are killing a life when you abort a baby. Even you pro abortionists know this. That is why you twist yourself into knots coming up with euphamisms like "choice" and "reproductive rights". You know you are on the losing side of the life argument so you do everything you can to try to dehumanize the unborn. As if you have the ability or knowledge to confer life at a particular point of gestation.

Spare me your feigned indignation and false analogies. That dog won't hunt

 

[NOVA]

And on WWII, our obligation to our allies ends beyond situations where they are attacked or in danger. Do I have to spell out everything to you?

And is that why we were dropping bombs in Yugoslavia during the Clinton years......?

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

And is that why we were dropping bombs in Yugoslavia during the Clinton years......?

Um, no. And I opposed that, vehemently.

Nice try, though. Very original.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

It's funny when rightie hacks assume that everyone thinks like them, and just goes in lockstep w/ their "side." Very revelatory.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Pro life people don't see innocents being killed in war as innocents being killed in war?

So you are going to continue pretending that you can't read what I have written? Ok... you truly have become quite pathetic. Take your above straw man and go ahead and burn it down.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

So you are going to continue pretending that you can't read what I have written? Ok... you truly have become quite pathetic. Take your above straw man and go ahead and burn it down.

I read it - you just don't think straight anymore. It's the same as telling BAC I called you a racist when I said you hated Obama.

It's weird, quite frankly.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Being anti-choice is not about "life"

And there we have it, the nazi's attempt to dehumanize the child. Pretending it isn't about life so that they don't have to justify taking the life.

as witnessed by their general depraved indifference to actual real live living beings.

More dehumanization attempts... go nazi go...

It's about controlling women's bodies and sexual freedom.

Bullshit... that is simply the excuse pro-abortionists use to avoid having to justifying killing an unborn child.

You can twist and you can dance but you know where the last two drops end up!

In your face???

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

I read it - you just don't think straight anymore. It's the same as telling BAC I called you a racist when I said you hated Obama.

It's weird, quite frankly.

No, you didn't read it. Otherwise you wouldn't have felt the need to create your pathetic straw man.

 

[Cancel 2016.11]

And there we have it, the nazi's attempt to dehumanize the child. Pretending it isn't about life so that they don't have to justify taking the life.



More dehumanization attempts... go nazi go...



Bullshit... that is simply the excuse pro-abortionists use to avoid having to justifying killing an unborn child.



In your face???

That's nice SF, you really need to take a few xanax.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

It's funny when rightie hacks assume that everyone thinks like them, and just goes in lockstep w/ their "side." Very revelatory.

LMAO... your entire premise is based on the fact that you think everyone thinks like you. That people can't distinguish between protecting an innocent life vs. a guilty murderers life. That people can't determine the difference between deliberately taking an innocent life and a case where innocents die in war unintentionally.

If you weren't such a pathetic hack, you would realize the complete irony of your post.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

That's nice SF, you really need to take a few xanax.

Oh look, the little nazi is now once again determining the mood of a person from typed words. Again dearest little darla... it is pity for you and lorax that I have, not anger. No matter how much you pretend to know otherwise, that will not change the reality of the matter.