Piers Morgan getting Dixie-chicked

more onceler hypocrisy

he doesn't care one wit and often supports such actions when the left engages in it, but he has a real problem when the right does it

i think the entire thing about morgan is stupid. however, he is free to offer his opinion and others are free to offer theirs.

I am in a dilemma about this, as I always thought of him as an obnoxious shit when he was in the UK. Anyway good for him in speaking out and pissing off the rednecks.
 
The petition may be an exercise of free speech but they are advocating government sanctions against an individual for exercising his free speech. It's hypocritical as hell.

foriegners can not come here and advocate against our laws. Subversion.
look it up.

This is something no other country in the world would allow, so why does this shock you and why does our country allow foreigners to attempt to convince people that we should have our constitutional laws revoked?
 
I agree with every single word as it makes perfect sense except to people like you.

Well, good thing you don't live here. I hope he leaves. We are smart enough in america to learn from the past. If you want to follow the path that being a disarmed populace provides, good for you. I prefer to live in a country where we can defend ourselves from a controlling elite who use their governemnt granted powers to serve themselves instead of the people. We were granted the right in our constitution. Until it's changed, we retain the right. We want the right to make sure our government doesn't become a tyranny. You might laugh at such a thought, but history is full of examples of government disarming people before the orderly enslavement/extermination of said peoples.

Why are you so ignorant of the steps tyranny takes?
 
Well, good thing you don't live here. I hope he leaves. We are smart enough in america to learn from the past. If you want to follow the path that being a disarmed populace provides, good for you. I prefer to live in a country where we can defend ourselves from a controlling elite who use their governemnt granted powers to serve themselves instead of the people. We were granted the right in our constitution. Until it's changed, we retain the right. We want the right to make sure our government doesn't become a tyranny. You might laugh at such a thought, but history is full of examples of government disarming people before the orderly enslavement/extermination of said peoples.

Why are you so ignorant of the steps tyranny takes?

Yes, like the elite that is David Gregory who thinks he can flaunt DCs gun laws and hide behind the 1st Amendment. I didn't know the first amendment was a defense against breaking other laws. Is there precedent?

Of course the go along to get along crowd will say it is "protected speech", but we all know it is about the elites who want to have a different set of rules for them and one for the proles.

David Gregory can send his kids to Sidwell which has armed guards. David Gregory can brandish a 30 round clip. But nothing happens to him. Some little girl nurses a woodpecker back to health and she has cops knocking on her door for breaking some endangered species act.

Yeah that makes sense
 
Neither of you morons can prove anyone on the 'right' is petitioning about anything.....thats your assumption....

I have proven with historical fact how the left and Democrats have used the gov. trying to silence or limit the free speech of the conservatives.....
just recently, the union thugs and Obamas and congressional Democrat support of them is further proof....

Go to the petition site on whitehouse.gov and note all the righties petitioning to secede from the union.
 
Go to the petition site on whitehouse.gov and note all the righties petitioning to secede from the union.

Do you entry into the union is irrevocable? We know Lincoln did and murdered 500,000 to prove it.

But why shouldn't a state be allowed to secede if they feel the Union is no longer serving its needs?

For folks who claim to like freedom, you like to force people to do things against their will
 
Do you entry into the union is irrevocable? We know Lincoln did and murdered 500,000 to prove it.

But why shouldn't a state be allowed to secede if they feel the Union is no longer serving its needs?

For folks who claim to like freedom, you like to force people to do things against their will

I agree with you, the South should have been allowed to go their own way. I think this guy has about right albeit with just a tad of rhetoric and sarcasm.

As I watched the pathetic New York Jets lay a goose egg against the Kansas City Chiefs this weekend, I realized I'd just watched a larger struggle between red states and blue states. Of course, New York is a perennial blue state and just looking at the sea of red shirts in the Kansas City crowd tells you which way bleeding Kansas votes. And just like in the last few elections the reds pounded the blues. That's when it hit me: we should have let the fucking South secede from the Union. If we had where would those ignorant fucks be right now? They'd be a third world country, wallowing in their own filth, throwing their trash on their lawn, hanging their niggers and fucking their sisters.

That's right, for all the idiots in the South who vote against their own interests, I've lost all respect and sympathy. Your Republicans have completely eroded all social safety nets, but guess what states depend on them the most? That's right, the glorious, self sufficient, "backbone of America" collects the most checks from Uncle Sam, the most unemployment, welfare and public assistance. Face it you fucks, the blue states keep this goddamn country afloat. New York and California generate more money then most of the red states combined. California alone is the fifth largest economy in the world. And yet every year Kansas and states like it vote overwhelmingly against there own self interests. And why? So that the gays can't get married? Brilliant. Do any of you even know any gays? Probably not. They don't live in your bullshit states. Make sure to keep voting exactly like the local church tells you. For all those people in the "red states" who stand against the red tide, I salute you for your strength in a sea of ignorance. But for all those that support life by opposing abortion, but supporting war and the death penalty, the only thing consistent is your inconsistency.

Christians who have a consistent position can be respected. If you support life, then stand against war, the death penalty and abortion, like the Pope. That's right the Pope doesn't support your war or your death penalty. Have a consistent position. I can respect that. But don't waste our time with your fake moral values just because you're opposed to people who abort a clump of cells. A few people have tried to study the madness of Kansas and their ilk. If you want to try to understand the insane, then read What's the Matter with Kansas, by Thomas Frank, if you can stomach it. Just know this: Every year, they vote to keep themselves working shitty jobs, at the whim of awesome corporate oligarchies, for minimum wage with no benefits. When they lose that job, they make sure to vote so that they can't get unemployment benefits after nine months. They pump out more kids and make sure they vote so they can't get food stamps or housing assistance. When they get sick, they make sure to vote so that they can't get health insurance. They pay the most taxes and then make sure to vote so that the richest people can take deduction after deduction until they're paying virtually nothing. Good for you, idiots, keep it up. You deserve everything you get. It's just too bad Lincoln wasn't smart enough to let you go when you wanted to so many years ago.

http://been-down-so-long-its-up.blogspot.co.uk/2005/09/we-should-have-let-south-secede-from.html
 
Back
Top