EPIC POST BY TINFOIL.
Shove it in their faces tinfoil
LOL LOSERS. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL YOU LOST! LOL!!!!!
Shove it in their faces tinfoil
LOL LOSERS. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL YOU LOST! LOL!!!!!
Hilarious. You've got all the talking points nailed.
"I was let go from a union at age 22 because I WORKED TOO FAST"
Yeah I tell people crazy shit when I let them go too. I like to let them down easily. It's always a lie.
I went to college and grad school and learned a profession so I wouldn't have to be part of a collective bargaining unit either. So what's your point?
Sometimes I tell them that they're too pretty, or too smart, or, well I always start out with the "I can tell you're not happy here"...that one always crack me up. I can tell you're not happy here and I want you to be happy.
I'm telling you half the guys i fired think i just finished...well, they don't feel like they got fired let's just put it that way.
People will believe anything. I am going to try that "you're too fast at your job" next time though. Man that's a good one.
I'd appreciate it if you didn't refer to my family members as "thugs".Actually I made no point about "right to work" only about the fact that new people coming into the work market don't look at unions like you do, nor do they think that giving union thugs a ton of cash to be helpful. That is a PR issue. They see their rights protected, and don't feel that paying a union to do it "more" is a good investment. It is what people perceive that I speak about, it is the "why" the laws like this are now passing in places that previously they never would have.
I'd appreciate it if you didn't refer to my family members as "thugs".
That or you might as well go work somewhere else. The point being here Grind. You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't benefit from collective bargaining with out contributing to the cost. If you think those who pay for that cost are going to tolerate those in their midst who don't you're wrong. In fact they would be idiots to tolerate such moochers.
I'd appreciate it if you didn't refer to my family members as "thugs".
if people love unions as much as you think they do, then unions shouldn't have any problems retaining their membership.
most of the protections they have argued for have been guaranteed by liberal legislation now anyway. unions don't fucking own the company. If the company wants to hire people and pay them a certain amount well then too bad for the unions they can blow it.
I'd appreciate it if you didn't refer to my family members as "thugs".
reap what you sew, union scum
Instead of "republican-democrat party" (which no longer exists), let's say "government" instead, and I will agree.
It's important to note, the Democrat party is ostensibly, The Party of Government. It is what they represent. Republicans can also fall into the same category, but Conservatives simply do not. Conservatives are NOT a political party, they believe in personal freedom and liberty, as opposed to Government control over our lives, and that is what they represent.
LOL
So you got fired, were never told why, fantasized that the real reason was because you were just too fast, and now you violently hate the people who fired you.
Yeah, I've fired a couple of employees like you too. You're always going to have someone who can't handle rejection, becomes embittered, and spends the rest of their life trying to get back at you.
The only thing you can do is pray they don't have a gun. I always worry about that one. You see them on CNN...
Literally, this post adds nothing to the conversation, doesn't do much more than underline that you simply ran out of propaganda.
And since when is making fun of republican stances on gay marriage a "talking point" that I would supposedly adhere to?
It was actually called the democratic-republican party.
And that's news to me. The Republicans are in large part responsible for filling up our prisons, and legal system with people who have never victimized anyone. I've been fighting them for most of my adult life. They have a history of legislating government control over our lives, and have been crapping on our constitution with no regard to personal liberty.
Actually I made no point about "right to work" only about the fact that new people coming into the work market don't look at unions like you do, nor do they think that giving union thugs a ton of cash to be helpful. That is a PR issue. They see their rights protected, and don't feel that paying a union to do it "more" is a good investment. It is what people perceive that I speak about, it is the "why" the laws like this are now passing in places that previously they never would have.