tie goes to the defense bro. That's how our legal system works. It's called reasonable doubt. Sorry you are a fascist, but that's the way it works.
Photo of bloodied, broken nosed George Zimmerman released
- Thread starter Pointgold
- Start date
tie goes to the defense bro. That's how our legal system works. It's called reasonable doubt. Sorry you are a fascist, but that's the way it works.
Wise Old Man
Banned
Dumb ass.
Evidence seems to show that, Zimmerman, the Hispanic, did indeed follow Martin.....and lost him....and while returning to his car was accosted by Martin.....
His testimony to police was that Martin asked him, "Do you have problem" ?.....Zimmerman answer, "No" and Martin replied, "well you do now"....
Zimmerman, the Hispanic, had the injuries....broken nose, black eyes, lacerations on his head.....
Martin had injuries.....busted knuckles and bullet in his chest.....
Martin was but a few door from his destination, but chose to take this little detour to meet up face to face with Zimmerman....
Unless other pertinent evidence is shown at trial to establish a different scenario, you're just another anti-Hispanic, racist POS......
zappasguitar
Well-known member
I'm doing no more "glazing over" than anyone who makes a statement like "at that point Martin followed him and confronted him..." and presents it as factual.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
LOL...evidence SEEMS to show that? sounds like there might be a "reasonable doubt" as to the veracity of this evidence.
Unfounded hearsay...proves nothing.
Black eyes? Funny, but Zimmerman's eyes didn't seem to be black in the new picture of Zimmerman we're all arguing over.
Because he knew he was being followed, and fearing for his life, he turned to confront the person following him.
You haven't provided enough evidence to establish your scenario is factual, but we get it. You gun nuts have to stick together.
Better to make up some bullshit and smear the kid who got murdered than to admit that Zimmerman is just another Dirty Harry wannabe out looking to gun down some criminals so he can feel like a BMOC.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Except that I did not present it as factual. You once again glazed over what was written and decided what you WANTED it to say rather than reading what I actually said.
Did the preceding text address the quoted post and thus make your "point" moot or are you deliberately misleading yourself into inanity? I quoted a post about "photoshopping" which was addressed by the direct information preceding a bit of advice.
Let's get this through right now, Onceler. I know you're still crying over your beat down yesterday and are desperately trying to catch me out on some sort of "gotcha" moment... So let's go through that short conversation from Yesterday:
Damo says: I know when you don't address my post and start talking about how "obtuse" something is I've won the argument.
Onceler says: You said obtuse before! (Thank you for the attempt at imitation, it is a sincere form of flattery, but it would be better if you applied it correctly).
Damo says: I also address the point of the post I am quoting. It isn't you saying "obtuse" that is the clue to who won the debate, it is the fact that you cannot address the post and solely use "obtuse".
Onceler says: But you removed some lines from some other post you quoted!
Damo points out: Yet I answered the whole quoted post.
Onceler says: But you said obtuse!
Damo points out: Yet I addressed the point of the post also...
And so this will go.
You have purposefully misapplied information to support your view here, you are far more intelligent than this.
Which skips the parts that inform you that the cops gave them the photo they released.
Which again directly ignores that the cops recently gave them the photo. This photo was released (in black and white) by the cops and given to GZ's attorney recently. They simply gave out the color image that the cops gave them...
Although your articles do make it clear that the source of the images are the police, which directly contradicts the insistence that the photos were 'shopped...
which was my point.
In order to continue insisting that this was 'shopped, you must ignore the source and pretend that GZ's attorney somehow took the picture. It isn't 'shopped.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Holy meltdown, batman!
And another tried & true Damo condescension, as well - "you're smarter/better than this."
Sorry, Mr. Damo - when you're grasping at comparing the cost of buying bullets to the cost of health insurance plans, you're not "beating down" anyone.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Oh, and re: the "obtuse" explanation - you might want to wait until 4:00, when I think the "hairsplitter's anonymous" group is meeting up...
SmarterthanYou
rebel
totally false equivalency. there is no comparison to these two events at all.
So far you've made two posts here that haven't addressed the point, and have solely been attacks. When you go in for a dime you go in for a dollar, eh?
Yeah, you've lost so bad you have to spread it into new threads... And it still makes me laugh.
And for your eternal joy... Obtuse.
[Translation]
He says, "Yeah, I know I had nothing to offer so I'll try another ad hom, maybe it will work this time!
[/Translation]
We see you, Onceler. That pole isn't wide enough to hide behind.
the question is who was defending themselves?
Well, it was colorized, it had been black and white, but that is all that was done to it.
Why do you do this?
What if they both were?
Because it is fun.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
I glazed over nothing.
I presented the facts as I see them and you've done the same.
It's a pity others aren't afforded the same journalistic freedom you allow yourself.