Proof affirmative action works

Like our friend Poet once posted....

"If its the truth, it ain't racism"

Ponder that awhile.
 
apple0154 said:
Of course they know where their bread and butter come from. One has a choice when electing a President. Elect one who takes people's money and literally burns it in war or elect one who offers medical care. Is that a tough decision for you?
Click to expand...

That has to be the dumbest post of the week. Where or where do you begin with trash like that.
 
Wise Old Man said:
That has to be the dumbest post of the week. Where or where do you begin with trash like that.
Click to expand...

I'd say Rumsfeld was probably the official start. "War was an option we could afford." Although most people were aware long before that his remarks made it crystal clear. Decades of trying to get a medical plan on the table and he comes up with that. The country can't afford to look after it's ill but it can afford a war.

Where, oh where, do they come up with trash like that?
 
Wise Old Man said:
This place is full of ignorant twits who will say and do anything to cover up for their fraud sitting in the White House.
Click to expand...

The best man won regardless of who thinks a fraud was committed. Good God, man, do you think people have forgotten the Bush/Repub years? The people are still paying the price. As some have noted the financial repercussions were equivalent to a world war.

Whether or not the Repubs or Bush was responsible the point is they were on watch at the time everything went to hell. Coincidence? Plain old bad luck? Incompetence of the highest order? To many, it really didn't matter what the reason. They just wanted to get as far away from the Repubs as possible. Can one blame them?

The financial crisis. Wars. The Patriot Act. Just look at how things changed. Who the hell would want to take a chance on another 4 years? If anything, the amount of votes the Repubs received is
suspicious. Do you really believe almost 50% of the people voted for them after experiencing the changes/disasters that occurred under their administration?

Voting fraud? Maybe, but not in favor of the Dems. That should be obvious.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
let's be truthful for once and just say the most popular man won, not the best. especially since neither Obama nor Romney had any inclination to follow, uphold, or defend the constitution.
Click to expand...

Why say that? Obama is following the "Founding Fathers' intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped the Constitution would achieve."

"The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory statement of the Constitution's fundamental purposes and guiding principles. It states in general terms, and courts have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers' intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped the Constitution would achieve."

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

"promote the general Welfare" That means when 45,000 citizens are needlessly dying every year a decent President will get off his ass and try to do something about it which is precisely what Obama did. The Repubs tried to do the contrary by saying America can't afford to look after it's ill citizens. It will bankrupt the country. It's punishing the innovators, the job creators, the people who believe their back yard pool just isn't big enough and they need to enlarge it and we shouldn't be taking their money to save people's lives.

The best man won. The man who understands the Founding Fathers wanted the best conditions possible for the people. The best life they could have. Not just the 1% but "we, the people."
 
apple0154 said:
The best man won regardless of who thinks a fraud was committed. Good God, man, do you think people have forgotten the Bush/Repub years? The people are still paying the price. As some have noted the financial repercussions were equivalent to a world war.

Whether or not the Repubs or Bush was responsible the point is they were on watch at the time everything went to hell. Coincidence? Plain old bad luck? Incompetence of the highest order? To many, it really didn't matter what the reason. They just wanted to get as far away from the Repubs as possible. Can one blame them?

The financial crisis. Wars. The Patriot Act. Just look at how things changed. Who the hell would want to take a chance on another 4 years? If anything, the amount of votes the Repubs received is
suspicious. Do you really believe almost 50% of the people voted for them after experiencing the changes/disasters that occurred under their administration?

Voting fraud? Maybe, but not in favor of the Dems. That should be obvious.
Click to expand...
Without the government involved, the housing crash wouldn't have been possible. Another failed social engineering experiment and you want to pin it on Bbbbush. Sorry, Charlie. The most dumbed-down among us may buy this, but everyone doesn't.
 
apple0154 said:
"promote the general Welfare" That means when 45,000 citizens are needlessly dying every year a decent President will get off his ass and try to do something about it which is precisely what Obama did. The Repubs tried to do the contrary by saying America can't afford to look after it's ill citizens. It will bankrupt the country. It's punishing the innovators, the job creators, the people who believe their back yard pool just isn't big enough and they need to enlarge it and we shouldn't be taking their money to save people's lives.
Click to expand...
The 45,000 meme has been debunked many times over, meaning either you are misinformed or dishonest.

Promote the general welfare does not mean provide it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top