Karl Rove claims President Obama won reelection by 'suppressing the vote' ???

learn to read.

You should take your own advice...

he was too close. he ran a superpac for romney. it was personal

It wasn't close. He couldn't believe his usual machinations hadn't worked...he wanted time just like the last time he pulled off his slight of hand...but it was called. It wasn't about him being too close to see...anyone with a brain knew the score and Fox called it. Rove, as usual wanted time for his underhanded vote stealing to work...but it didn't work this time...he was dumbfounded and made a complete ass out of himself with his blustering refusal to recognize his defeat and the loss, the complete loss, of more money than had ever been seen for a campaign with nothing to show for it.

It had nothing to do with him being close.
 
You should take your own advice...



It wasn't close. He couldn't believe his usual machinations hadn't worked...he wanted time just like the last time he pulled off his slight of hand...but it was called. It wasn't about him being too close to see...anyone with a brain knew the score and Fox called it. Rove, as usual wanted time for his underhanded vote stealing to work...but it didn't work this time...he was dumbfounded and made a complete ass out of himself with his blustering refusal to recognize his defeat and the loss, the complete loss, of more money than had ever been seen for a campaign with nothing to show for it.

It had nothing to do with him being close.

your first response to me specifically mentioned the election itself being to close:

No it wasn't too close...it had been called.


now you are trying to pivot into pretending that all along you knew what I was talking about, (rove being close to what was going on) rather than simply admit to being wrong on your interpretation of what you thought I said.

 
So Rove lied.

I am not in any position to say one way or the other.

Are you stupid enough to actually believe that because of a single solitary experience of not being suppressed that one can logically conclude suppression happened absolutely no where?
 
your first response to me specifically mentioned the election itself being to close:



now you are trying to pivot into pretending that all along you knew what I was talking about, (rove being close to what was going on) rather than simply admit to being wrong on your interpretation of what you thought I said.


No just filing in the blanks. You didn't address my post..

Originally Posted by Haiku
Something didn't work on election night...I've never seen such an odd performance as he gave on Fox...except in other elections when he managed it.

Other than to suggest he was just agog because he was so involved (not just close) which totally ignored his amazing behavior. Someone who is invested doesn't act like that...he kept it up until someone had to make the trip to the numbers people. Then everyone laughed at him but his behavior was very, very odd.
 
lol for anyone confused legion was trolling this thread and now has decided to self delete all his posts.
 
Back
Top