Very interesting

many people

You can't say it can you desh... because it is a FACT that you wish to ignore.

It was repealed by BOTH parties. Its repeal was signed by BILL CLINTON... DEMOCRAT.

FACT.

Then Bush held back all of the protections for 8 years so the Rs got everything they wanted and none of that pesky stuff they had to put into the bill to get it passed and signed by Clinton

Tell us Desh, the repeal was done in 1999. Why did Clinton not put it in place in 2000? You are such a partisan hack that you want to pretend it was just 'Bush'. Again, you ignore the FACTS of what actually happened.
 
because the repeal included the broker rules protections.

How was Bill to know the republicans would game the bill and postpone the parts of the bill they didnt like for 8 years??
 
No, I will not. She consistently trots on here with the stupid 'u all ignore facts' line of crap. Then when you point out facts that don't adhere to her line of thinking she ignores them. She is a complete hypocrite on the matter. In addition, her saying the same thing over and over and over again doesn't add anything to the discussion.

Translation; I am a big fat bully and always have been.
 
I love the "tell us" shtick.

It's so megalomaniacal I don't think many realize it. It's a tactic used to portray yourself as someone speaking for many against one.
 
because the repeal included the broker rules protections.

How was Bill to know the republicans would game the bill and postpone the parts of the bill they didnt like for 8 years??

See what I mean Desh... you continue to pretend it was Bush's fault, even though it was delayed for over a year under Clinton. You don't want facts, you want to believe in your myth.
 
facts are things which exist. For instance, it is fact that the Republican party attempted to systemically disenfranchise minority voters. It is fact that Obama was leading going into election day.

no one has to determine these things - you simply need to live in reality. As we all know, Karl Rove told a reporter during the Bush administration that reality was old school and that they create their own reality.

You know, I'd say that has come back to bite you guys in the ass- what do you think Cawacko?

There were a couple of polls that showed Romney winning on election day but yes most showed Obama winning. And how do you want to define living in reality because for better or worse there are a lot of people who live in their own reality.
 
note he skipped right over the facts I supplied proof of

Dear moron, I was typing a post when you posted that. I didn't skip over it. See, more evidence that you just make shit up to suit your deluded little world.

The FACTs you provided show that under both Clinton and Bush, those rules were delayed. Yet you continue to pretend it was just Bush.

thanks for proving my point. you ignore FACTS and instead make up your own alternate reality. You ignore any FACTS that actually contradict your partisan bullshit.
 
There were a couple of polls that showed Romney winning on election day but yes most showed Obama winning. And how do you want to define living in reality because for better or worse there are a lot of people who live in their own reality.

Well you may think that, but the guy living in reality? Had two speeches written.

And he was leading.
 
I have told you before but I will tell you again.

Brokers in the past had to have a brokers lisence.


Banks could hire and train whomever they wanted to preform these NEWLY gained services with no license needed.


These brokers were beholdne ONLY to the banks.

Now set broker rules that would cause them to lose their license if they sold bank securitiestainted with subprime like the banks ordered them to sell or lose their jobs.


If the banks could not have pawned off the subprime loans to unsuspecting securities buyers they could not have made money from writing them.



please remember the answer for next time
 
I love the "tell us" shtick.

It's so megalomaniacal I don't think many realize it. It's a tactic used to portray yourself as someone speaking for many against one.

Yes, it is also known as "claiming the expert", one of many tricks Simplefreak uses to bulley (supposedly) weaker opponents.
 
Fucking Phil Graham and you damn well know it too.

LMAO... 90-2 vote in the Senate. Signed by Bill Clinton. No matter how hard you Dems try, nothing is going to change the FACT that it was repealed by both parties. Pointing to the original authors of the bills and saying it was all them is nothing short of partisan stupidity.
 
Back
Top