Is Barrack Hussin Obama Crying?

[Cancel 2016.2]

I'm not hiding anything; if you are following Benghazi enough to accuse the admin of "scandal!", you would know about that development.

As for "questions that need to be addressed," we agree - but it is the answers to those questions that will determine if this is a scandal, or not. Right now, there is no "scandal", as I stated initially.

Yes, you are... you continue saying that the claims were both debunked, yet you continue to fail to provide any evidence of said debunking. I have asked for it multiple times to back your claim and multiple times you have responded without any link. That is hiding. You are running away from your claim rather than backing it up.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Yes, you are... you continue saying that the claims were both debunked, yet you continue to fail to provide any evidence of said debunking. I have asked for it multiple times to back your claim and multiple times you have responded without any link. That is hiding. You are running away from your claim rather than backing it up.

I assume you've heard of Google? Go there. Type in "senior intelligence official orders to stand down".

Learn something.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...i-stand-down-denials-dont-stand-up-to-reason/

After dodging, Clark asked the first and most important part again: “Were they denied requests for help during the attack?” And once again Obama offered a non-answer, saying: “I can tell you as I have said over the last couple of months since this happened, that the minute I found out this was going on, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, we’re going to investigate exactly what happened to make sure it doesn’t happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice.” He continued, “I guarantee you that everybody in the State Department, our military, CIA, you name it, had number-one priority making sure that people were safe. These are our folks. And we’re going to find out exactly what happened.”

So... where is that directive? Where is the order?

Why did they not beef up security in a KNOWN hotspot when such a request had been made multiple times by people on site?

Why does Panetta say they didn't send anyone in because 'we didn't know what was going on' while knowing that we had two predator drones on site during the seven hour attack giving them live footage?

Why did they not at least have the Spec Ops deploy immediately? If they weren't needed upon arrival they could have been diverted back to Italy. Yet they weren't even sent. The scandal is in the refusal by the admin to provide any answers to these questions. They continue to claim they are investigating... coincidentally enough that investigation is not going to be concluded prior to the election. Imagine that.

 

[SJJRSJJS]

Um... no, it is not. What we will find out after the election is the details on:

1) Fast and Furious
2) Benghazi
3) Unemployment rate

I absolutely agree with you

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Did USF's repeated use of sexual degradation today get you excited and lead to your making this post?

This is how a board becomes hostile to women.

USF comes on here with one hand on the keyboard and another on his inch and half as usual, no one says anything to him, and the cyber gang bang is on as alllll the pigs join in .

And this board is hostile to women.

I would tell you to shut your mouth; but it diminesh your ability to earn an income.
When you complain to evince, about her comments, you might gain some acceptability to complain about others.

 

[zappasguitar]

Holy hackery, batman - you go all false-outrage on the Fox thing, and then post an opinion piece by BILL BENNETT as your backup?

A senior intel official gave a press conference last week, and said they never gave orders to stand down, and that no calls for help were denied. You should do some research before screaming "scandal!"

It's not enough to want to believe there was a scandal. There has to be some "there" there.

It's quite hysterical, isn't it?

Partisan Righties who whine about "liberal bias", regard an Op-Ed piece written by an noted RightWing Pundit as "factual"

 

[PostmodernProphet]

There is no Benghazi scandal.

liberals will NOT be scandalized!......