You need to watch this

Lowaicue

英語在香港
Of course some of you might have seen this before. I make no excuse for asking that you watch it again and that those who are frightened to face facts gird up their loins (WTF does that mean?) and watch.


Copy the address and paste it everywhere you can.
 
Pretty much. It comes from douches like you citing 15 minute long videos, no time reference, with one or two words supposedly misspoken as "evidence". Exposure to liberalism is the leading cause of mental retardation and every time I read your posts my IQ slips.
 
Pretty much. It comes from douches like you citing 15 minute long videos, no time reference, with one or two words supposedly misspoken as "evidence". Exposure to liberalism is the leading cause of mental retardation and every time I read your posts my IQ slips.

That's because liberalism is new to you. It's like everything in life that is worthwhile, persevere and you will see the benefits that are hidden from you at present because of your unfortunate southern upbringing.
BTW I don't know if you think I am a Liberal or not, but for your information I am not.
 
1978



How long did they take more than one wife?


How many girls were molested by the mormon church?
 
That's because liberalism is new to you. It's like everything in life that is worthwhile, persevere and you will see the benefits that are hidden from you at present because of your unfortunate southern upbringing.
BTW I don't know if you think I am a Liberal or not, but for your information I am not.
Oh that's right, you're too much of a coward to proclaim you political affiliation in a political forum.

Liberalism isn't new to me at all. I was raised in the most liberal state in the union. We chose The South to raise our family because the values here are much more conservative. We made the right choice, as our two children are solid citizens, and I now enjoy a solid voting bloc of four for the most conservative candidates on the ticket.
 
They were banned until 1978 and were forced by Carter to change their minds, yeh big deal indeed!!

They were enslaved until the 1860's and the Republicans had to kill hundreds of thousands of Democrats in order to convince them that this was not Constitutional. Then they were terrorized, murdered, segregated and not allowed to vote, and that took a century of effort by Republicans jailing, writing new laws and finally subduing the Democrat Party into accepting equality. (By insisting on Affirmative Action Forever, they still haven't.)

It seems to me that the LDS changed their minds much more quickly. So where's your condemnation of your beloved Democrat Party?
 
Oh that's right, you're too much of a coward to proclaim you political affiliation in a political forum.

Liberalism isn't new to me at all. I was raised in the most liberal state in the union. We chose The South to raise our family because the values here are much more conservative. We made the right choice, as our two children are solid citizens, and I now enjoy a solid voting bloc of four for the most conservative candidates on the ticket.

Remembering for a moment that I am not an American, which party do you think I would be affiliated with?
You are too stupid so I will not request an apology.
Conservative means to maintain (or conserve) those things that one finds important. Yet, how strange it is that your bat shit crazy ear-biting candidate is promoting, not just 'change' but real change.
Explain if you possess sufficient wit.
 
So the LDS had a problem with blacks. Did they enslave them, segregate them, and hang them from trees like your beloved DEMOCRAT PARTY did?

Well they did say they should be the 'servants' of 'the servants'. I guess that is the sort of freedom you kill people for in America. Yee Haa, you gotta president who is a servant of the servants....

er... isn't that what a president should be? Is it not his job to serve your country as best he can?

OK That's good. We all agree. A guy who believes the shit that your man believes will serve no one but himself.
 
They were enslaved until the 1860's and the Republicans had to kill hundreds of thousands of Democrats in order to convince them that this was not Constitutional. Then they were terrorized, murdered, segregated and not allowed to vote, and that took a century of effort by Republicans jailing, writing new laws and finally subduing the Democrat Party into accepting equality. (By insisting on Affirmative Action Forever, they still haven't.)

It seems to me that the LDS changed their minds much more quickly. So where's your condemnation of your beloved Democrat Party?

That's a bit misleading, those Democrats of whom you speak were conservatives. And Im more than happy to condemn conservatives. The Republicans of Lincoln's age were Progressive.

Republican Rutherford B. Hayes abandon Reconstruction because he could no longer count on Southern Conservative Democrats in congress to fund the military presence in the south. He withdrew and Jim Crow was established effectively removing the rights of Blacks, who were a majority Republican, as citizens.

Neither party until FDR did anything to alleviate the plight of blacks in this country, though FDR didn't do much, this is when the Democratic Party moved toward Progressivism and when the Black Republican voting block began moving wholesale to the Democratic Party,. It actually started with Hoover. It was when Truman integrated the Military that we see the black democratic voting block take shape and the Southern Conservative split from the party and form the Dixiecrats.

Moderate Republican Eisenhower to his credit forced the integration of schools, something Conservatives have been trying to undo every since. The civil rights stances of JFK and LBJ disenfranchised Democratic Southern Conservatives who then would support former Democratic Conservative and segregationist George Wallace, who ran as an Independent and won all of the Southerns states except Florida, Nixon won the South on his Conservative Law & Order/ anti busing platform, yet he expanded Affirmative Action. Despite this his appearance of standing up to the left and the fact that the left despised him made him and his party very appealing to Conservatives in the South and they began to change parties.

So in short, when you attribute those atrocities and misdeeds to Democrats its a distortion because you are ignoring the fact that the were Conservatives.
 
Remembering for a moment that I am not an American, which party do you think I would be affiliated with?
You are too stupid so I will not request an apology.
Conservative means to maintain (or conserve) those things that one finds important. Yet, how strange it is that your bat shit crazy ear-biting candidate is promoting, not just 'change' but real change.
Explain if you possess sufficient wit.

You're commenting on contemporary American politics yet using non-political definitions of conservatism. That's retarded. :nono:
 
Well they did say they should be the 'servants' of 'the servants'. I guess that is the sort of freedom you kill people for in America. Yee Haa, you gotta president who is a servant of the servants....

er... isn't that what a president should be? Is it not his job to serve your country as best he can?

OK That's good. We all agree. A guy who believes the shit that your man believes will serve no one but himself.
You're confused. All Christians are tasked to serve others.
 
That's a bit misleading, those Democrats of whom you speak were conservatives. And Im more than happy to condemn conservatives. The Republicans of Lincoln's age were Progressive.

Republican Rutherford B. Hayes abandon Reconstruction because he could no longer count on Southern Conservative Democrats in congress to fund the military presence in the south. He withdrew and Jim Crow was established effectively removing the rights of Blacks, who were a majority Republican, as citizens.

Neither party until FDR did anything to alleviate the plight of blacks in this country, though FDR didn't do much, this is when the Democratic Party moved toward Progressivism and when the Black Republican voting block began moving wholesale to the Democratic Party,. It actually started with Hoover. It was when Truman integrated the Military that we see the black democratic voting block take shape and the Southern Conservative split from the party and form the Dixiecrats.

Moderate Republican Eisenhower to his credit forced the integration of schools, something Conservatives have been trying to undo every since. The civil rights stances of JFK and LBJ disenfranchised Democratic Southern Conservatives who then would support former Democratic Conservative and segregationist George Wallace, who ran as an Independent and won all of the Southerns states except Florida, Nixon won the South on his Conservative Law & Order/ anti busing platform, yet he expanded Affirmative Action. Despite this his appearance of standing up to the left and the fact that the left despised him made him and his party very appealing to Conservatives in the South and they began to change parties.

So in short, when you attribute those atrocities and misdeeds to Democrats its a distortion because you are ignoring the fact that the were Conservatives.

The terms "progressive" and "conservative" in a political sense have changed significantly since Lincoln's time. I suggest you look up how each describe themselves today and go from there. Until you do that your entire argument above is meaningless.
 
Progressive: a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas. ORIGIN early 17th cent.: from French progressif, -ive or medieval Latin progressivus, from progress- ‘gone forward,’ from the verb progredi (see progress) .

Conservative: a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics. ORIGIN late Middle English (in the sense ‘aiming to preserve’): from late Latin conservativus, from conservat- ‘conserved,’ from the verb conservare (see conserve). Current senses date from the mid 19th century onward.

I figured posting the definitions and when the words became part of our lexicon would help you glean a little more meaning from my argument.
 
Back
Top