No surprise here, just conformation of what we know....

N

NOVA

U. S. NAVY Veteran
The press overwhelmingly bought into the Obama administration's version of events on the attack at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, according to a new study Friday by the Center for Media and Public Affairs, which tracks news reports.

CMPA analysts said press accounts framed the attack as a spontaneous protest — the Obama administration's initial version of events — four times more often than they called it a terrorist assault, which was what Republicans and even some Democrats identified it as in the days right after Sept. 11.

Read more: Study: Media accepted Obama version of Benghazi attack - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog...-obama-version-benghazi-attack/#ixzz2B6CJwNEZ
 
Just so we're clear, what we've confirmed is that studies by right-wing think tanks reported in right-wing newspapers will find fault with the librul media, right?
 
Dungheap said:
Just so we're clear, what we've confirmed is that studies by right-wing think tanks reported in right-wing newspapers will find fault with the librul media, right?
Click to expand...

just so we're clear, what we've confirmed is that studies by left wing think tanks reported in left wing rags will agree with obama...right?
 
bravo said:
The press overwhelmingly bought into the Obama administration's version of events on the attack at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, according to a new study Friday by the Center for Media and Public Affairs, which tracks news reports.

CMPA analysts said press accounts framed the attack as a spontaneous protest — the Obama administration's initial version of events — four times more often than they called it a terrorist assault, which was what Republicans and even some Democrats identified it as in the days right after Sept. 11.

Read more: Study: Media accepted Obama version of Benghazi attack - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog...-obama-version-benghazi-attack/#ixzz2B6CJwNEZ
Click to expand...


Watch the pathetic Rightie STILL trying to get some traction out of this totally discredited story.

According to a new study done by the NPLARI, Partisan Republicans will ignore any information which paints Obama in a positive light, and will instead cling to their discredited conspiracy theories because they hate the President.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Watch the pathetic Rightie STILL trying to get some traction out of this totally discredited story.

According to a new study done by the NPLARI, Partisan Republicans will ignore any information which paints Obama in a positive light, and will instead cling to their discredited conspiracy theories because they hate the President.
Click to expand...

oh look...derision and insults and this time you can't cry - he started it

LOL

two faced douchebag
 
bravo said:
The press overwhelmingly bought into the Obama administration's version of events on the attack at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, according to a new study Friday by the Center for Media and Public Affairs, which tracks news reports.

CMPA analysts said press accounts framed the attack as a spontaneous protest — the Obama administration's initial version of events — four times more often than they called it a terrorist assault, which was what Republicans and even some Democrats identified it as in the days right after Sept. 11.

Read more: Study: Media accepted Obama version of Benghazi attack - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog...-obama-version-benghazi-attack/#ixzz2B6CJwNEZ
Click to expand...

It's a good thing Fox News didn't.

Because they reported as fact last week that forces were ordered to stand down, and that requests for assistance were denied. And this is something that was repeated as fact by countless Fox viewers, including posters on this site.

Problem is, a senior intel official told the press yesterday that none of that is true - they never gave orders to stand down, or denied requests for assistance.
 
But....but...Blabo conformated it, didn't he?

Poor Blabo.
 
Thing1 said:
It's a good thing Fox News didn't.

Because they reported as fact last week that forces were ordered to stand down, and that requests for assistance were denied. And this is something that was repeated as fact by countless Fox viewers, including posters on this site.

Problem is, a senior intel official told the press yesterday that none of that is true - they never gave orders to stand down, or denied requests for assistance.
Click to expand...


Isn't it odd how suddenly nobody wants to talk about that?
 
Dungheap said:
Just so we're clear, what we've confirmed is that studies by right-wing think tanks reported in right-wing newspapers will find fault with the librul media, right?
Click to expand...

What we are clear on is, the media admits to its left leaning bias...they admit that the vast majority of their numbers vote Democrat ....

There is no question, there is no ambiguity, there is no denying these facts.....their freely admit it.....
 
The Dude said:
You gotta be a simpleton to watch fox!
Click to expand...

Actually, the simpletons would watch only what agreed with them. You have to be a simpleton to listen to an echo chamber and believe that it is the only source of "truth".

One thing that I do like about Cable News networks is the fact that only one of them pretends to be unbiased, but knowing the bias helps to get a good distribution of news from different sources. You can gather information from both sources and because of the pretext of each of the networks you are far more likely to get a good grasp on the larger picture than if you solely dedicate yourself to one of the pretend "unbiased" sources or an echo chamber that agrees with you politically.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top