Reuters: White House TOLD OF militant claim two hours after LIBYA ATTACK, emails show

was that the ONLY information they had?


look you idiot the comoplete picture was NOT known at the time.

It still is not a complete picture.


This is more proof your party will politicize ANYTHING in you grab for power
 
was that the ONLY information they had?


look you idiot the comoplete picture was NOT known at the time.

It still is not a complete picture.


This is more proof your party will politicize ANYTHING in you grab for power

Interesting take on this. So why didn't the OWEdummy administration just say that at the time instead of blaming a movie? I will let you head spin for a while waiting for a response
 
that sure seems like what the people who died thought was happening by the release they issued to the public there.


This is just like F and F.

its a bunch of fucking blather friom the right wing to create something out of nothing.

just like F and F the moire facts we know the more craven you idiots look
 
that sure seems like what the people who died thought was happening by the release they issued to the public there.


This is just like F and F.

its a bunch of fucking blather friom the right wing to create something out of nothing.

just like F and F the moire facts we know the more craven you idiots look

Let's ask again. If the administration didn't know as you assert, why did they blame the movie? Clinton did it. Rice did it. OWEbama did it at the UN.

Why?
 
why did Robmoney blame the president for a release right bofore the attack which was made by the very people who became victims?


what did that release say?


It told the people in this area that they condemed the tape.


Those people living under threat likely KNEW what the threat was.


You fucks just LIED and claimed it was the Obama appology tour.


You fucks lie like that all the time
 
Let's ask again. If the administration didn't know as you assert, why did they blame the movie? Clinton did it. Rice did it. OWEbama did it at the UN.

Why?


Because the CIA did it, which we've known for a while now. The CIA's initial assessment of a spontaneous protest continued to appear in its PDB through September 22. You can question why the Obama Administration didn't push back on that assessment given conflicting information from the State Department, but there is no mystery why Obama Administration officials linked the attack to spontaneous protests given the CIA assessment:

WASHINGTON—President Barack Obama was told in his daily intelligence briefing for more than a week after the consulate siege in Benghazi that the assault grew out of a spontaneous protest, despite conflicting reports from witnesses and other sources that began to cast doubt on the accuracy of that assessment almost from the start.

New details about the contents of the President's Daily Brief, which haven't been reported previously, show that the Central Intelligence Agency didn't adjust the classified assessment until Sept. 22, fueling tensions between the administration and the agency.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203400604578071302911132288.html
 
Just like F and F when the REAL facts hit the public they drop this foolish crap like it was hot
 
Just like F and F when the REAL facts hit the public they drop this foolish crap like it was hot

Wrong Desh... F&F Facts are now HIDDEN, thanks to Obama.

As for the embassy attack... why are you running away from the question? Why did they continually blame the video? You say they didn't mention the claim because they didn't have all the facts, yet they ran around for weeks shouting it was all a spontaneous response to a video. Why did they do that desh?
 
F and F was dropped by your team the minute the spotlight really hit it.

then everyone saw what fucking liars you people are so the right dropped it instantly
 
Wrong Desh... F&F Facts are now HIDDEN, thanks to Obama.

As for the embassy attack... why are you running away from the question? Why did they continually blame the video? You say they didn't mention the claim because they didn't have all the facts, yet they ran around for weeks shouting it was all a spontaneous response to a video. Why did they do that desh?


I've already told you why and posted a link to a WSJ article telling you why. Read it. You might learn something.
 
super duper will jujst ignore any facts he doesnt like.

he done it all the long years Ive known him on the internets.


There are series' of those tubes he pretends dont open to him
 
F and F was dropped by your team the minute the spotlight really hit it.

then everyone saw what fucking liars you people are so the right dropped it instantly

Tell us Desh... why did Obama and Holder hide behind executive privilege if there was nothing to see?
 
Ansar al Sharia claimed it was in response to the movie but more likely and directly they took action after seeing what was happening in Cairo, which was pretty obviously due to the movie. This group operates within Lybia and has acted violently in support of their radical application of Islam before.

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/09/12/the_battle_of_the_shrines

Please quote the portion of the article that states they claimed the attack was due to the video, because I am not seeing it upon first read. Thanks.
 
Please quote the portion of the article that states they claimed the attack was due to the video, because I am not seeing it upon first read. Thanks.


It says protests. The initial reports were that the Benghazi attack grew out of protests that were inspired by protests in Cairo, which were about the video.
 
And robmoney rushed to say Obama was appologising to the terrorists.

fucking party over country at every turn
 
Back
Top